'Brexit' might impact Samsung, LG, and Acer, and not in a good way

By Williams Pelegrin June 25, 2016

brexit samsung lg acer business european union

Even though the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union might have satisfied 51.9 percent of those who voted to leave, do not count Samsung, LG, and Acer among those who were in favor, reported The Korea Herald.

As things stand now, Samsung and LG have seen sales in the EU drop over the years. From 2013 to 2015, Samsung’s European sales fell from 21.2 to 12.8 percent of its total sales, while LG’s European sales dropped from 11.2 to 10.3 percent of its overall sales. In other words, both companies have already seen decreasing sales in the EU, something that surely must not make them too happy.

These drops in sales have reportedly been compounded by “Brexit,” the campaign that pushed for Britain’s exit from the EU. Even though it will take at least another two years for the decision to be implemented, Samsung, LG, and Acer are allegedly concerned that their European-made products will be subject to tariffs once they make their way to the U.K. market. Furthermore, due to the vote to remove the U.K. from the EU, the British pound has weakened, which might lead to increased prices of electronics.

Due to these concerns, both Samsung and LG are reportedly thinking about relocating their London offices somewhere else. Their production facilities will not be affected by any possible moves, however, since they are not located in the U.K. Samsung has production facilities in Poland that make home appliances, with additional production facilities in Slovakia and Hungary that make televisions. LG’s main production facility is located in Poland.

As for Acer, company CEO Jason Chen told DigiTimes that Britain’s decision to leave the EU will result in weaker demand in the European market. According to the CEO, the weaker demand will be due to “weakened consumer confidence and exchange rate fluctuations.” Chen also said his company would closely monitor the impact Britain’s decision will have on business.

It will take some time to identify all the ramification of such an unprecedented event as Britain’s withdrawal from the EU, but expect to hear more from tech companies regarding Brexit as Britain prepares to hold negotiations and prepare new procedures with the EU.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics

Williams Pelegrin

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…

Mobile

Are smartphone depth cameras pointless? Samsung might think so

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G's camera module.

An interesting report from The Elec suggests that Samsung could be pulling back on the number of cameras found in its midrange smartphones, preferring to focus on improving the quality of what's there rather than continuing to play the numbers game.

This year's midrange Galaxy A series phones all sport four cameras on the rear: a main shooter ranging from 48 megapixels (MP) in the Galaxy A33, to 64MP in the Galaxy A53, to 108MP in the Galaxy A73. Joining those primary cameras are ultrawide, macro, and depth cameras of various specs.

Mobile

6 ways Samsung can make cheap (and good) folding phones

The Samsung Galazy Z Fold 3 and Z Flip 3.

Earlier this week, news broke that Samsung is working on delivering sub-$800 foldables by 2024. The current-gen Galaxy Z Fold 3 starts at $1,799, while the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is selling for $999 -- notable decreases compared to the $1,980 Galaxy Fold and $1,380 first-gen Z Flip. While the $999 price tag of the Flip 3 is credited for the boom in the popularity of foldables, it still requires a further decrease in price for mainstream users to fully embrace foldable technology. And Samsung knows this.

We now know that Samsung is reportedly working on cheaper foldables. But how might the company make and launch a foldable smartphone that costs less than $800? We have a few ideas on how that could happen.
No external display on the Flip
Let’s start with the Flip, the cheaper of the two Samsung foldables on the market right now. The smartphone carries an external display for you to get things done on the go. It features a 1.9-inch display on the front, which lets you look at the date and time, see quick notifications, and personalize it to your liking with different clocks.

Mobile

5 ways the Galaxy A53 5G is a good value, and 1 way it isn’t

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G and Galaxy A33 5G blue and peach colors.

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is your way into Galaxy phone ownership without having to splurge on a phone like the expensive (but admittedly brilliant) Galaxy S22 Ultra. The newly released smartphone costs $450 which is far more affordable, and we think it's shaping up to offer good value.

Let's look at the ways the Galaxy A53 5G delivers this value, in an effort to help you make the decision whether to pick this phone up or not. Then, at the end, we'll talk about the one area the Galaxy A53 is losing out on compared to the competition.
Lower price
Despite a new processor and other hardware improvements, the Galaxy A53 5G is cheaper than its predecessor, the Galaxy A52 5G. You pay $450 for the new phone compared to $500 for the old model, or 399 British pounds in the U.K. compared to 450 pounds. While most manufacturers attempt to keep the same price with a new model, it’s rare to see the price go down. It’s part of why we consider the A53 5G good value, even after only a short time using it.
Years of software support
You'll spend less buying the new Galaxy A53 5G than before, and for that lower price, you'll also get longer software support this time around. Samsung has committed to delivering four years of Android updates and five years of security updates to the Galaxy A53 5G, a year longer than it did for the Galaxy A52 5G. It’s the same software update commitment you get if you purchase a Galaxy S22 series phone.