Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Android
  4. Mobile
  5. Legacy Archives

The doctor will see you now: Google announces ‘Glass at Work’ partners

Add as a preferred source on Google

Google may not be able to convince the average consumer that Glass is useful, but it’s certainly doing a good job with doctors and businesses. On Monday, Google announced that it has added several new partners to the “Glass at Work” program, including APX, Augmedix, Crowdoptic, GuidiGo, and Wearable Intelligence.

After the Daily Show debacle, Google wants to prove that Glass has multiple, practical uses in the real world, and what better way to do so than by highlighting how respected businesses and medical professionals use the device every day?

Recommended Videos

New partner APX Labs is responsible for the business software currently available on Glass, which helps employees get real-time access to enterprise data whenever they need it. Meanwhile, CrowdOptic’s software can detect broadcast events from mobile devices, and then market relevant apps for several different industries. The third new partner, GuidiGo, sends Glass users information about the important sites they are seeing, while they are at a museum, on a trip, or some other type of cultural activity where a guide might be useful.

The last two partners focus almost exclusively on the medical applications of Glass. Wearable Intelligence offers Glass apps for use in the medical, energy, and manufacturing fields, while Augmedix strives to reconnect patients with their doctors, using Glass.

Google Glass Doctor
Image used with permission by copyright holder

For six months, Augmedix has been testing Google Glass out with real doctors from Dignity Health’s Ventura Medical Clinic. The goal is to get doctors away from patient files on their computers and encourage them to interact more naturally with their patients. Three different doctors used Glass during 2,700 scheduled appointments with patients who agreed to the trial.

Right before the appointment, the doctors turn Glass on to receive updates about the patient who is coming. Then, once the patient arrives, they start recording the conversation. As the patient lists his or her symptoms and health history, Glass streams all the audio and visual information recorded by the device directly to the Augmedix platform. There, the data is entered into the correct blanks in the patient’s electronic medical record (EMR). So, instead of staring at a computer screen, typing, and saying, “mmhmm,” distractedly while the patient talks, the doctor can actually pay full attention and maintain eye contact with the patient.

Dignity Health says that the doctors who have been using Glass spend significantly less time entering patient data into the system. Based on the trial, Dignity found that the amount of time spent entering data decreased from 33 percent to just 9 percent and increased time spent directly with the patient from 35 percent to 70 percent. Clearly, automatic data entry with Glass speeds up that part of the process. Theoretically, the more time spent one on one with the patient, the better care the doctor can provide.

Naturally, this is just a trial run, so there are sure to be many skeptics who wonder if the majority of patients will really consent to having their most intimate medical details recorded and streamed over Glass for the sake of saving the doctors some time. Of course, Dignity set up an encrypted network for the data stream from Glass to the EMR and added lots of authentication barriers to prevent a potential breach of patient privacy.

It’s unclear what Glass’ future will be in any market, but so far, it seems to be doing well in the medical and business fields, if no where else. Dignity and its doctors seem enthusiastic about the controversial wearable in the video below.

Malarie Gokey
As DT's Mobile Editor, Malarie runs the Mobile and Wearables sections, which cover smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, and…
Apple’s lease program is just a soft landing for you to spend on pricier iPhones this year
Hand holding iPhone 17 Pro.

A few days ago, Apple introduced a new "Upgrade" program that is essentially a lease program for buying Apple hardware. Instead of paying the full cost up front, you space the monthly installments (12, 24, and 36 month spells), and at the end of the lease period, you can choose to return the device, upgrade to a new one, or pay the remainder cost and keep it forever.

The broad idea is simple. Instead of taking a thousand-dollar hit on the wallet, you space the hit across small monthly payments. For a flagship iPhone, that broadly comes down to a dollar per day, and for budget phones such as the iPhone 17e, it's just half a dollar each day, if you do the breakdown. At least Apple is looking at it that way.

Read more
Pixel 11 leak predicts a weird mix of upgrades and downgrades for a higher price
The Pixel 11 may start at $899 with 256GB of storage, but its camera setup remains unclear.
Google Pixel 10a smartphone

Google may ask Pixel 11 buyers to pay $100 more for a phone that improves the parts they can’t see while leaving a conspicuous camera question unresolved. A new leak from Android Headlines puts the base model at $899, up from the Pixel 10’s $799 starting price.

The extra money would at least buy more capacity. The Pixel 11 reportedly starts at 256GB rather than 128GB, while the leaked specifications list both 12GB and 16GB RAM options. Yet the same list mentions only a main camera and an ultrawide, even though other leaked renders still appear to show three rear camera openings.

Read more
Google’s Pixel 11 Pro Fold could offer Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra specs for $200 less
Google’s leaked foldable could match the Fold8’s price with Ultra-sized screens and 5x zoom
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

Google may be preparing to challenge Samsung’s most expensive foldable without charging Ultra money. According to Android Headlines, the Pixel 11 Pro Fold will start at $1,899, matching the Galaxy Z Fold8 and undercutting the $2,099 Fold8 Ultra by $200.

Its rumored hardware makes that pricing especially interesting. Google’s foldable appears much closer to Samsung’s Ultra model in display size, even though it would cost the same as the smaller Fold8.

Read more