Skip to main content

Are smartphone depth cameras pointless? Samsung might think so

An interesting report from The Elec suggests that Samsung could be pulling back on the number of cameras found in its midrange smartphones, preferring to focus on improving the quality of what’s there rather than continuing to play the numbers game.

This year’s midrange Galaxy A series phones all sport four cameras on the rear: a main shooter ranging from 48 megapixels (MP) in the Galaxy A33, to 64MP in the Galaxy A53, to 108MP in the Galaxy A73. Joining those primary cameras are ultrawide, macro, and depth cameras of various specs.

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G leaning against a tree.
Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

However, that could change with next year’s Galaxy A series lineup. This early report should be taken with skepticism at this point, but if it’s accurate, Samsung’s 2023 Galaxy A24, A34, and A54  will sport only three cameras each. Samsung has apparently deemed the depth camera as having little use on its midrange phones and instead plans to work on improving the specs on the three camera modules that will remain.

The report makes no mention of the Galaxy A73’s successor, which would presumably be the A74, but that’s not a surprising omission. The A73 was little more than a footnote during Samsung’s March Galaxy A event, and like its predecessor, it launched in a limited number of markets.

Improving the main cameras

While depth cameras are arguably valuable for high-end flagship smartphones, they’re of dubious value in midrange handsets, where they typically haven’t been put to good use. Instead, many smartphone manufacturers have added these extra cameras as gimmicks to keep up with their competitors. This focus on putting in as many extra lenses and sensors as possible often means the main cameras suffer.

The most salient counter-example of this is the Nothing Phone 1. The new Carl Pei-led project took the “brave” approach of releasing a smartphone with much hype, midrange specs, and a stunningly modest two-lens camera system. It was a move that clearly swam against the tide, but Nothing’s bold choice to go with a relatively minimalist camera design appears to have paid off; the Phone 1 takes surprisingly great photos, and it seems clear that Nothing made the right choice by focusing on building two great cameras rather than five mediocre ones.

Glyph lights active around the Nothing Phone 1's camera module.
Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

This latest rumor suggests that Samsung may at least partly follow Nothing’s lead. However, it’s ultimately more about reducing costs as the South Korean smartphone maker faces more competition from Chinese competitors. By cutting the depth camera, Samsung can put its money and engineering efforts into improving the considerably more important wide, ultrawide, and macro camera sensors.

However, while the report notes that the Galaxy A34 will include the same 48MP wide and 8MP ultrawide sensors as the Galaxy A33, it oddly suggests that next year’s Galaxy A54 will feature 50MP wide and 5MP ultrawide sensors, which would be a drop from the 64MP and 12MP sensors found on the Galaxy A53. That would be an unusual regression for Samsung, so treat that with a healthy dose of skepticism, though it may be tied to Samsung’s plans to expand optical image stabilization (OIS) on its midrange Galaxy smartphones. The Galaxy A33 and Galaxy A53 introduced OIS on the primary camera this year, a feature that was previously the exclusive domain of the pricier Galaxy S and Note series phones.

Editors' Recommendations

Jesse Hollington
Jesse has been a technology enthusiast for his entire life — he probably would have been born with an iPhone in his hand…
Samsung’s Exynos 1280 chipset details promise ‘5G for all’
A graphic of the Samsung Exynos 1280 processor flying through the air with some emojis and square phone apps.

Samsung revealed the Exynos 1280 a while back, but has been stingy on details ever since despite launching the Galaxy A53 5G and A33 5G with the chipset. Now, the company is finally ready to share what's going on underneath the hood of its shiny new mobile processor. In short, the Exynos 1280 aims to bring solid 5G connection to devices in Samsung's budget to midrange lines.

The Exynos 1280 brings a lot to the table for the devices in which it will be used. Two Cortex A78 CPUs and six A55 cores give the chipset a good deal of processing power while not being overkill for the rest of the hardware. In terms of graphics, the 1280 features a Valhall-based ARM Mali-G68 GPU and can display 120Hz at 1080p.

Read more
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G goes on sale, will take on iPhone SE
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G in white and black.

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is finally hitting the shelves in the U.S. carrying a $450 price tag. Samsung’s latest mid-range phone is up for grabs from AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon, and the company’s official website. Folks purchasing it from will get the Galaxy Buds Live earbuds as a freebie for a limited time. That’s a sweet offer, as the bean-shaped noise-canceling earbuds cost $170 when they made their debut in 2020.

As for the phone itself, the Galaxy A53 5G has a lot going for it. Samsung has armed its “iPhone SE 3 killer” with a 6.5-inch FHD+ AMOLED display with some 120Hz refresh rate goodness on top. Apple’s latest budget phone is far behind due to its LCD display with an HD resolution and outdated bezel-heavy design.

Read more
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G and Galaxy A33 5G blue and peach colors.

Looking for an attractive midrange smartphone? Samsung has recently announced some additions that may be of interest to you. The first, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, is a high-powered midrange smartphone with a 5mn Exynos processor, a quad-lens rear camera module, a 120Hz refresh rate, and, of course, support for 5G. At $450 it's a real steal, and we're looking forward to getting to grips with it in our review.

The second smartphone, the Galaxy A33 5G, is a weirder beast. It's a slightly pared-down version of the Galaxy A53 that doesn't seem to be getting a U.S. release. Still, it's a great-looking phone, sharing many specs with the Galaxy A53, but at an even lower price point. If you're in the U.S. you're denied the choice between the two, but for those outside of the States (or those curious about the differences) here's how the two stack up against each other and where the major differences lie.

Read more