The Samsung Galaxy Watch Active was 2019’s follow-up to the then-flagship Galaxy Watch that launched late in 2018. The device is beautiful, comfortable to wear, and offers great fitness tracking features, but it’s more of an alternative to the Galaxy Watch, rather than a successor.
So what are the differences? Which device is better for your needs? Should you buy the smaller and cheaper Galaxy Watch Active, or shell out for the larger watch? We put the Galaxy Watch against the Galaxy Watch Active in a head-to-head test to find out.
|Samsung Galaxy Watch
||Samsung Galaxy Watch Active|
|Display size||1.2 inches/1.3 inches||1.1 inches|
|Body size||42mm: 41.9 x 45.7 x 12.7 mm
46mm: 46 x 49 x 13 mm
|40mm: 39.5 x 39.5 x 10.5 mm|
360 x 360 pixels
|360 x 360 pixels|
|Touchscreen||42mm: 1.2-inch Super AMOLED display
46mm: 1.3-inch Super AMOLED display
|Wireless interface||Bluetooth 4.2, Wi-Fi 802.11b/g/n, NFC, LTE and UMTS||Bluetooth 4.2, Wi-Fi 802.11b/g/n, GPS, NFC|
|Ambient light sensor||Yes||Yes|
|Heart rate sensor||Yes||Yes|
|Price||From $260||From $200|
|DT review||4 out of 5 stars||4 out of 5 stars|
The standard Samsung Galaxy Watch has a much more traditional design than the Galaxy Watch Active. If you want a watch that will look good with any outfit, then it might be a better choice for you. It’s a little chunkier than its sporty counterpart, but if you like that old-school watch look, then you’ll appreciate the extra heft. The bezel around the display is also functional — it rotates to allow for easier selection in the software. It’s important to note, the Galaxy Watch does come in two sizes: There’s a 42mm and a 46mm option. The Galaxy Watch Active only has one 40mm size.
The Galaxy Watch Active is quite a bit smaller than both Galaxy Watch devices, offering a 1.1-inch display instead of the 1.2 or 1.3-inch displays. It’s also a little simpler, offering a basic round look without any flourishes. That’s not to say it doesn’t look good — it might attract people who favor minimal designs a little more.
The display on both the Active and the Galaxy Watch smartwatches are quite similar. They all use AMOLED displays with a resolution of 360 x 360 pixels. The main difference is just display size, which we mentioned above.
Both the Galaxy Watch and Galaxy Watch Active look good, but the latter is the more comfortable watch to wear. It also doesn’t look tiny on large wrists, and doesn’t look massive on small ones. It’s a great one-size-fits-all watch, whereas the standard Galaxy Watch smartwatches are beefier. It’s largely a personal choice, but we prefer the sleek look of the Galaxy Watch Active and its lightweight nature.
Winner: Samsung Galaxy Watch Active
The Samsung Galaxy Watch Active is clearly aimed at athletes considering its lightweight build and slimmer design, but when it comes to actual fitness-tracking features, the devices are more or less the same. Both smartwatches offer a heart rate monitor, GPS, and you can see all your health data in the Samsung Health app.
You can track steps taken, distance traveled, exercise activities like running or walking, and even sleep. There are even widgets that quickly let you add how much water or coffee you drank a day, in case you want to keep track of it. The experience is very similar across these watches.
Apart from design, battery life is perhaps the biggest difference between the standard Galaxy Watch and the Galaxy Watch Active. The standard Galaxy Watch has either a 270mAh or 472mAh battery, depending on the size of the watch that you get. The Galaxy Watch Active, on the other hand, has a 230mAh battery.
That means the 46mm Galaxy Watch lasts the longest — about three to four days — whereas the 42mm Galaxy Watch survived about two to three days (depending on use). The Galaxy Watch Active barely hit two days of usage. All these watches can easily last a full day, it’s just the Active will definitely require you to charge it every night. It’s an easy win for the Galaxy Watch.
Winner: Samsung Galaxy Watch
Just when we thought the Galaxy Watch didn’t have any more surprises left to unveil, it does — there’s a 4G model available. It may cost a bit extra, but the benefits are well worth it. You will be able to get notifications, calls, and the ability to stream music even when your phone isn’t with you. Keep in mind that this feature entails data usage, so you’ll need to purchase a plan that provides for its data expenditure. If your phone doesn’t travel with you everywhere you go, or if you leave it at home when you go to the gym or on a run), but you still want all the functions available on the smartwatch, then the cellular Galaxy Watch is your best bet.
Winner: Samsung Galaxy Watch
The standard Samsung Galaxy Watch has been out there for two years now, but it’s still available from Samsung and your favorite retailer for as low as $280 for the 42mm version or $300 for the 46mm model. The Galaxy Watch Active has become a lot more accessible since its debut in April 2019, with current online prices amounting to an affordable $160.
Both the standard Galaxy Watch and Galaxy Watch Active strong competitors. While the Galaxy Watch’s battery lasts the longest of the two options, it sacrifices its physical appearance for functionality. The Galaxy Watch Active, on the other hand, is a bit easier on the eyes and is lighter. a good trait to have for those who wear it while exercising or playing sports. The Galaxy Watch is our victor because it can last longer, but if you’re on a budget and exercise often, the Galaxy Watch Active is the best choice for you.
- Does the iPhone 14 have a fingerprint sensor? Here’s what happened to Touch ID
- Does the iPhone 14 have the Dynamic Island?
- Does the iPhone 14 have an always-on display? Know this before buying
- Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs. AirPods Pro: What’s new?
- Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs. Google Pixel Buds Pro