Skip to main content

Can you offset your carbon footprint with a smartphone app? Klima thinks so

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The average American burns twice as much fossil fuel as a typical European. So what does it take to go from a super-polluting American to a more eco-friendly French person? Just go vegan, give up your car, and never fly again.

At least, that’s what I found when I tried Klima: A new app that invites you to pay a monthly amount to offset your carbon footprint. The more you put into the atmosphere (both directly or indirectly), the more you owe.

Recommended Videos

For example, if you shop a ton and live in a mansion, you might need to pay $26 a month to offset the negative environmental impact that those things have on the planet. On the other hand, a vegetarian in a tiny home who only owns a bike might only need to fork over $7.

Where does that money go? Klima, together with its partners ClimatePartner  and Co2ol, uses your monthly fee to fund environmental projects such as tree planting and solar panel installations, which help to offset your carbon footprint. The company isn’t a non-profit, though; 70% of your payment goes to the projects, while 10% goes to Klima’s operating costs and 20% goes to education and outreach.

Jay Dickman

To calculate your footprint, the app takes you through a variety of aspects of your life. Do you take a lot of plane rides? Are they long or short trips? Are you vegan? Can your shopping trips be classified as luxury? While the queries are fairly easy to answer, that means some nuance can be lost, like whether you’re driving a gas-guzzling SUV or a more fuel-efficient model. (You can indicate if you have an electric car, though.) “We wanted to stay away from questions where you need to put down your phone and kind of look something up in your documents,” Markus Gilles, Klima’s co-founder, told Digital Trends.

Other important factors, like your income, also aren’t taken into account. The app is launching in 18 countries, using a baseline for energy type, although in the U.S. electricity sources vary by state. Your area’s climate will also determine whether you’re blasting an air conditioner or heater several months out of the year, but the app doesn’t ask for your zip code. The idea isn’t to give you a dead-on number but ballpark it and let you pay for your pollution. The Nature Conservancy has a much more detailed calculator, though you might not know the amount of your yearly electricity bill off the top of your head.

The whole process for getting my tons of carbon emissions was straightforward but revealed some limitations. When I started hitting the plus sign on the flights page — pretending this was a normal year, when in reality I haven’t flown since January — a pop-up told me that my employer is responsible for offsetting my work trips. If you work for a company that participates in a carbon offset program, great. If not, it kind of speaks to the larger problem with an app like this.

American Wind Energy Association/Facebook

Most people want to do their best when it comes to climate change. They want to turn the lights off when they leave a room and shut off the water when brushing their teeth. But buying a more efficient washer or electric car isn’t feasible for a lot of people. And an extra $20 a month is beyond many people’s budgets.

“I think climate change, the climate crisis is such an urgent and pressing topic that we need to act on all levels of society,” said Gilles. There are obviously roles for individuals to play. But when your country’s administration is rolling back environmental regulations left and right, a plan to go meatless three times a week may feel small and futile.

That being said, Klima’s format does let you get an idea of how certain changes will affect your overall footprint. You can watch the number rise and fall as you add and subtract flights or change your diet. “We’ve really tried to focus on long-term lifestyle commitments rather than, like, daily tracking,” said Gilles.

Ultimately, of course, it’s better for the environment to avoid emitting carbon in the first place than to try and undo the damage afterwards.

Jenny McGrath
Former Senior Writer, Home
Jenny McGrath is a senior writer at Digital Trends covering the intersection of tech and the arts and the environment. Before…
Google just gave vision to AI, but it’s still not available for everyone
Gemini Live App on the Galaxy S25 Ultra broadcast to a TV showing the Gemini app with the camera feature open

Google has just officially announced the roll out of a powerful Gemini AI feature that means the intelligence can now see.

This started in March as Google began to show off Gemini Live, but it's now become more widely available.

Read more
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more