Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

Is funding films on Kickstarter about creativity or cutting corners?

Add as a preferred source on Google

zb ks wish i was hereKickstarter is far from a perfect platform. Backing a project comes with a variety of risks, risks that have been widely discussed and publicized; at this point it’s safe to say that anyone who loses money (or pride, or dignity) by backing a faulty or doomed Kickstarter project has been warned. And then some.

The other gray, confusing, and contentious area of Kickstarter has more to do with those behind the projects than those backing them. While there are plenty of idea men and women out there using the platform to …  kick start (it’s just the best way to say it) their products and concepts, there is another breed of Kickstarter: The celebrity.

Recommended Videos

Zach Braff is the latest famous Kickstarter user. He’s pitching an indie film called Wish I Was Here. Braff explains why he decided to head the crowdfunding route rather than the typical Hollywood production path.

“I was about to sign a typical financing deal in order to get the money to make [this movie]. It would have involved making a lot of sacrifices I think have ultimately hurt the film,” he says. “I’ve been a backer for several projects on Kickstarter, and thought the concept was fascinating and revolutionary for artists and innovators of all kinds. But I didn’t imagine it could work on larger-scale project. I was wrong.”

He references the “incredible” success of the Veronica Mars Kickstarter campaign, saying that this method means creators can retain control over smaller, personal films. So far, backers have contributed nearly $880,000 to Braff’s project (which is asking for a cool $2 million – you can see its progression in the widget above). Perks range from early access to the Wish I Was Here soundtrack and production diary all the way up to the chance to be a cast member.

Whoa, hold up, what’s that now? Yes, that’s right, if you’re willing to pony up a whopping $10,000, you can be a cast member in the film. “For one of my biggest supports, here’s one of the biggest rewards. You will be credited as a cast member of Wish I Was Here,” the campaign explains. “Visit us on set and if you want, I’ll put you in a scene we are shooting and write a line just for you. And, we’ll give you the star treatment. Hair, makeup, wardrobe, and a space to practice your line.”

It’s a strange dichotomy: Braff is turning to Kickstarter so he can retain more control over this film, yet he’s willing to sacrifice certain elements in order to crowd-finance it. For $7,000, one lucky backer will be able to name a character, for $2,500, you could be an extra.

Of course, the Veronica Mars project has similar perks: For $2,500, you can be a featured background extra; for $6,500, you can name a character. $10,000, and you get a speaking role.

So that’s hypothetical problem with this number one: Either way, you’re selling out to make your movie. You can do it through traditional financing models, or you can do it by auctioning off bits and pieces of it to … well, anyone.

Then there’s the fact that people who turn to funding their movies on Kickstarter get to retain more of the money. If you don’t use actual producers and investors – which, surprise, are expensive – when you sell the distribution rights to a film, you have fewer (maybe zero) people to pay back. Instead, you sold off bit parts and t-shirts.

The last issue is either of little or paramount importance to you: When big names and already-successful producers take to Kickstarter to fund their projects, it devalues the purpose of the platform and draws attention to those who don’t actually need it. Sure, if the majority speaks and donates, then clearly this concept was meant to be made … but people like Zach Braff and Rob Thomas (the writer, not the lead singer of Matchbox Twenty) don’t need the help or the spotlight – they just want it. 

Molly McHugh
Former Social Media/Web Editor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
Topics
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more