Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

New dot-com bubble looms ahead of Groupon IPO

Add as a preferred source on Google
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Groupon has exploded in 2011, more than doubling its subscriber list to a whopping 115 million folks and solidifying its position at the top of the daily deals heap.

This is great news as company gets ready for its initial public offering sometime this fall. The sheer number of investors of drooling over the chance to snag a piece of Groupon is enough to make one reminisce of the dot-com glory days.

Recommended Videos

In another throwback to the bubble days, Groupon has caught flak recently for the use of a proprietary accounting metric that pretty blatantly inflated the company’s worth. While the use of strange metrics in IPO filings is nothing new, and not illegal, investors were getting grumpy about shenanigans ahead of what’s expected to be a billion dollar offering.

Groupon called the metric Adjusted Consolidated Segment Operating Income (ACSOI), which is a really snazzy way to refer to a calculation of Groupon’s income that ignores marketing costs. In the all-online, cutthroat world of daily deals, marketing is one of the most massive expenses for the company. In fact, in the first quarter of 2011, Groupon reported a $117 million operating loss. However, the company’s ACSOI (which was also reported on IPO filings) was an $82 million gain, largely because the company spent $180 million on marketing during the quarter.

While it’s not sure whether Groupon was trying to be tricky or coy with the metric, as most accountants reviewing the IPO have more or less made fun of how silly it is, the company has amended its filing and any controversy will surely blow over. But the larger question is whether or not such moves hint at the inflation of another dot-com bubble.

Groupon is essentially a free coupon business with a model that could be, and has been, replicated by any number of startups, and yet its expected to be valued at $15 billion to $20 billion. Speculation that Groupon was using ASCOI to keep their own value bubble inflated aside, the business is worth so much largely because of how big its subscriber base is, especially with the company posting losses. That hearkens back to the first dot-com bubble, when investors were so hungry for anything tech that they’d snatch up anything that seemed of worth, including companies with terrible balance sheets but pushing non-traditional metrics like number of daily users in their accounting.

With a tech resurgence in investing coming with social media, especially with standout LinkedIn’s IPO, and investors drooling over Facebook and Twitter, there’s no doubt that Groupon’s IPO will be a roaring success. But at the same time, if a company is a true superstar, why would it play such chintzy accounting games? The fact of the matter is, having an absurd number of users is certainly enticing, but if its so alluring that investors look past a company’s inability to make money off those users, we might indeed have another bubble on our hands.

Derek Mead
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Topics
Meta’s new AI can generate images of you from your Instagram, and you’re opted in 
Meta's approach to Instagram likeness rights with Muse Image raises questions that a watermark alone doesn't answer.
Instagram Muse Image

Meta launched Muse Image on July 7, 2026, and while it’s an exciting development, buried inside all the announcements is something that deserves a closer look. 

If your Instagram account is public, strangers can use your photos to generate AI images of you via Muse Image. More importantly, it's switched on by default.

Read more
Meta’s new image and video AI tools let you turn Instagram into your creative mood board
Two models, one launch, and an Instagram trick nobody else has.
Art, Collage, Face

Meta has been cooking something up, and today, it finally put it on the table. On July 7, 2026, Meta Superintelligence Labs launched Muse Image and Muse Video (in preview), its first in-house media generation models. 

The rollout comes with a few features that are genuinely hard to argue with.

Read more
Social media ban for young users is proving to be an age verification nightmare
A fake birthday is enough to beat Australia's social media ban on teens.
Social media apps on smartphone

Australia’s world-first teen social media ban was supposed to keep children under 16 away from popular platforms, including Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, and X. While this was a major controversial change, it appears that getting around it was barely even a challenge.

Researchers created 50 test accounts across nine of the ten platforms covered by the law. Each account claimed its user was 16, the minimum permitted age. None of the platforms asked the researchers to provide proof or complete another age-assurance check. Only the Australian livestreaming platform Kick refused to create an account without a proper age verification.

Read more