Skip to main content

Betelgeuse mystery explained using data from Hubble Space Telescope

Late last year, astronomers noticed that the normally bright star Betelgeuse was dimming dramatically. While it’s typical for stars to grow brighter and dimmer over time, the reduction in Betelgeuse’s brightness was dramatic: It dropped to just 36% of its normal brightness over a few months, and scientists weren’t sure why.

A previous theory stated that the dimming was due to starspots, similar to sunspots, which cover the surface of the star. But now, researchers using the Hubble Space Telescope have examined more detailed information about Betelgeuse. They believe that the star ejected a large amount of hot plasma which formed a dust cloud around it, blocking off most of its light from Earth.

The artist’s impression of the darkening of the red supergiant Betelgeuse.
The artist’s impression of the darkening of the red supergiant Betelgeuse. NASA, ESA, and E. Wheatley (STScI)

The researchers looked at several months’ worth of Hubble observations, beginning in January 2019, so that they could see the progress of the dimming event over time. Through the period of September 2019 to November 2019, they saw hot, dense material moving into the star’s atmosphere. By December 2019, the dimming of the star was visible from Earth.

“With Hubble, we see the material as it left the star’s visible surface and moved out through the atmosphere, before the dust formed that caused the star to appear to dim,” lead researcher Andrea Dupree, associate director of The Center for Astrophysics at Harvard & Smithsonian explained in a statement. “We could see the effect of a dense, hot region in the southeast part of the star moving outward.”

“This material was two to four times more luminous than the star’s normal brightness,” she continued. “And then, about a month later, the southern hemisphere of Betelgeuse dimmed conspicuously as the star grew fainter. We think it is possible that a dark cloud resulted from the outflow that Hubble detected. Only Hubble gives us this evidence of what led up to the dimming.”

In order to look past the ultrahot layers of the star’s atmosphere, the team used Hubble’s ultraviolet capabilities to see what was going on on the surface of the star. They saw plasma moving off the surface and into the atmosphere at an epic 200,000 miles per hour, shooting away from the star and zipping out millions of miles into the surrounding space. This material then cooled and turned into dust, which was what blocked the star’s light and made it appear to dim.

It is possible that the star is gearing up to go supernova, as it is an older star and is reaching the end of its life. Scientists have no way to predict exactly when a supernova event will occur, however.

“No one knows what a star does right before it goes supernova, because it’s never been observed,” Dupree said. “Astronomers have sampled stars maybe a year ahead of them going supernova, but not within days or weeks before it happened. But the chance of the star going supernova anytime soon is pretty small.”

Editors' Recommendations

Georgina Torbet
Georgina is the Digital Trends space writer, covering human space exploration, planetary science, and cosmology. She…
Scientists explain cosmic ‘question mark’ spotted by Webb space telescope
The shape of a question mark captured by the James Webb Space Telescope.

Considering the myriad of unknowns that still exist for scientists exploring the vastness of the universe, the recent discovery in deep space of what seems to be a giant question mark feels highly appropriate.

Captured by the powerful James Webb Space Telescope, the bright, distinctive object clearly bears the shape of a question mark, leaving some stargazers wondering if the cosmos is teasing us, or perhaps motivating us to keep on searching the depths of space for the secrets that it may reveal.

Read more
One galaxy, two views: see a comparison of images from Hubble and Webb
The peculiar galaxy NGC 3256 takes centre stage in this image from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. This distorted galaxy is the wreckage of a head-on collision between two spiral galaxies which likely occurred 500 million years ago, and it is studded with clumps of young stars which were formed as gas and dust from the two galaxies collided.

It might not seem obvious why astronomers need multiple different powerful space telescopes. Surely a more powerful telescope is better than a less powerful one? So why are there multiple different telescopes in orbit, either around Earth or around the sun?

The answer is to do with two main factors. One is the telescope's field of view, meaning how much of the sky it looks at. Some telescopes are useful for looking at large areas of the sky in less detail, working as survey telescopes to identify objects for further research or to look at the universe on a large scale -- like the recently launched Euclid mission. While others, like the Hubble Space Telescope, look at small areas of the sky in great detail, which is useful for studying particular objects.

Read more
Hubble scientists create tool for erasing satellite trails from images
This image captures the streak of an Earth-orbiting artificial satellite crossing Hubble's field of view during an observation of "The Mice" interacting galaxies (NGC 4676). A typical satellite trail is very thin and will affect less than 0.5% of a single Hubble exposure. Though in this case the satellite overlaps a portion of the target galaxy, the observation quality is not affected. That's because multiple exposures are taken of the same target. And the satellite trail is not in other frames. Developers at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Maryland, have software that identifies the bad pixels from the satellite photobombing, the extent to which they affect the image, and then flags them. When flagged, scientists can recover the full field of view. Even as the number of satellites increases over the decade, these tools for cleaning the images will still be applicable.

With ever-increasing numbers of satellites in the sky, astronomers have repeatedly expressed worry over how these satellites could impact scientific research. Earlier this year, a study of Hubble Space Telescope observations showed how some images were being ruined by streaks of light coming from satellites -- and while only a small percentage of Hubble images were affected, the authors raised concerns that with the projected number of satellites set to explode in the next decade, the problem could become serious.

Now, astronomers at the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI), which runs Hubble, have come up with a tool to deal with satellite streaks in Hubble images. "We developed a new tool to identify satellite trails that is an improvement over the previous satellite software because it is much more sensitive. So we think it will be better for identifying and removing satellite trails in Hubble images," said Dave Stark of STScI in a statement.

Read more