Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Space
  3. News

What happened to Mars’ water? It’s more complicated than we thought

Add as a preferred source on Google

This mosaic of Mars is composed of about 100 Viking Orbiter images. The images were acquired in 1980 during mid-northern summer on Mars.
This mosaic of Mars is composed of about 100 Viking Orbiter images. The images were acquired in 1980 during mid-northern summer on Mars. NASA/JPL-Caltech/USGS

Scientists agree that once, billions of years ago, Mars had liquid water on its surface which formed lakes and oceans. It may even have looked similar to Earth once upon a time. But over time, that water was lost, and Mars is now a dry, arid place. Water exists there only in the form of ice near its poles and in tiny quantities of water vapor in its atmosphere.

Recommended Videos

The question that remains is: How did this happen? Where did Mars’s water go? The generally accepted theory is that its water evaporated away into space, in a process called atmospheric escape. Billions of years ago, when sunlight hit the planet it warmed the water there, which rose into the atmosphere as vapor. Winds carried this vapor to the poles, where ultraviolet radiation from the sun split it into hydrogen, which then escaped into space. Over time, water was lost this way.

But now, a new piece of research is challenging this theory. It has found that a significant amount of water is trapped in minerals in the planet’s crust, meaning that it didn’t escape into space. With oceans estimated to be between 100 and 1,500 meters deep, there would have been too much water for atmospheric loss to explain where it all went.

“Atmospheric escape doesn’t fully explain the data that we have for how much water actually once existed on Mars,” said lead author Eva Scheller in a statement.

The researchers don’t disagree that atmospheric escape happened — but they do think this process was supplemented by water being trapped in minerals in the crust. Water interacts with rocks to form clays, in a similar process to what is seen on Earth. The difference between here and there is that Earth has an active interior with plate tectonics, so rocks are churned up and recycled and their water is released back into the system. On Mars, the interior of the planet is largely inactive so these rocks don’t release their water.

“The hydrated materials on our own planet are being continually recycled through plate tectonics,” said Michael Meyer, lead scientist for NASA’s Mars Exploration Program in the statement. “Because we have measurements from multiple spacecraft, we can see that Mars doesn’t recycle, and so water is now locked up in the crust or been lost to space.”

Georgina Torbet
Georgina has been the space writer at Digital Trends space writer for six years, covering human space exploration, planetary…
SpaceX Starship reaches orbit for the first time but its historic flight ends early
Starship reaches orbit for the first time and deploys 26 Starlink satellites before an early splashdown.
spacex-starship

After 13 suborbital test flights and more than $15 billion in development costs, SpaceX's Starship has finally reached orbit. The 407-foot megarocket, the most powerful ever built, lifted off from Starbase, Texas, on Monday and delivered its first real payload on it's 14th attempt. The celebration came with an asterisk, though, since SpaceX had to cut the planned 10-hour mission to roughly three hours.

https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/2104601695711904180

Read more
Starship is finally going orbital, and SpaceX has picked September 22
Flight 14 is aiming for orbit, Starlink V3 deployment and a very long day in space.
Starship rocket.

SpaceX is finally ready to give Starship its biggest test yet. The company says the massive rocket's 14th test flight is scheduled for September 22, when it will attempt to put the upper stage into Earth orbit for the first time. The launch is currently pending regulatory approval, with a 75-minute window opening at 7:15 a.m. CT.

Starship has 26 Starlink satellites to deliver

Read more
Want a city on the Moon? Scientists say there’s not enough water
A billion tons still comes up short
Artist impression of activities in a Moon Base.

For decades, humanity has looked up at the Moon and wondered what it would be like to live on it. Think sprawling cities, factories, research centers, and permanent human settlements. Unfortunately, there is one fairly fundamental problem with that vision.

A new study published in Frontiers in Space Technologies argues that even the Moon's potentially enormous reserves of frozen water may be nowhere near enough to support city-sized populations sustainably. Researchers Martin Elvis and Jonathan McDowell estimate that the permanently shadowed regions near the lunar poles could contain roughly one billion tons of water. It sounds like an extraordinary amount until you put a million thirsty humans next to it.

Read more