The fiasco that is Instagram’s terms of service just won’t die. On Monday, former Engadget editor in chief, and co-founder of Gdgt, Ryan Block penned an op-ed for The New York Times’ Bits blog entitled “Why I’m Quitting Instagram.” Block not only “suspended posting photos” to Instagram, where he had “almost 9,000 followers,” but also dropped Facebook, which of course now owns Instagram.
In making his account deletion public, Block hopes to make the point that “[w]e’d all be much better off simplifying our technological footprints and consolidating our trust in the few services that provide us the greatest value with the fewest unintended side effects.”
Block’s declaration follows a similar protest from Wired’s Mat Honan, who announced that he had “nuked” his Instagram profile within hours after the company’s fateful terms of service announcement – a position to which he held strong even after Instagram recoiled with an apology for the “confusion” over whether it would or would not sell users’ photos.
Block and Honan are apparently far from the only people who hold a grudge against Instagram: mobile application analytics firm AppData reported this past weekend that some 3.5 million Instagram users – about 25 percent of its total user base – deleted their profiles upon learning that the photo-sharing company could sell the use of their photos without permission. (Instagram later refuted these claims, saying that the number is much lower – and that 2.3 million new people joined the service during the same period.) Regardless of the exact numbers, it’s clear from the collective response that people don’t like their photos or data being used without their consent, as Instagram’s (and Facebook’s) terms of service still allow it to do, despite revisions to the document.
Like any other privacy-minded Web user, I applaud Block and Honan, and share in their discontent. But I’m still not deleting my Instagram or Facebook accounts – even though my principles clearly tell me I should – for one simple reason: These companies have already won.
Advertising and, as a result, data collection, form the foundation of the online economy. To make a lick of difference in how nearly every major Internet company – not just Instagram and Facebook – treat user data, we would have to stop using the Web entirely, and rebuild the whole tower from scratch. Simply deleting a profile or two does next to nothing to protect our online selves. And while you could install a privacy-protection browser plug-in, or use Tor or a VPN, such efforts appear to have zero effect on the ways in which online companies do business.
The idealist in me imagines a day when legions of the Web population suddenly realize that we’ve been had, that we are not simply users – we are the ones being used; then we all join in clicking the “delete” button. The companies will cower in the face of our wrath, and abruptly apologize for whoring us out to the highest bidder (or any bidder at all). From then on, they’ll ask for our permission for everything. It’ll be grand, I tell you. Grand!
This day is, of course, never coming. We know we’re being used, and most of us don’t seem to care – the morsels we get for turning over our lives to online services, apps, ad companies, data brokers, and multitudes of other “third parties” taste too delicious to reject them. Meanwhile, the Internet advertising business continues to boom. Silicon Valley keeps pumping out future Mark Zuckerbergs. And we sit increasingly glued to our ubiquitous screens.
My instinct tells me to scream and stomp and bang frying pans together every chance I get in an attempt to convince my fellow users that this privacy stuff matters, and the services we helped turn into wealthy businesses that we users should be respected by default – bottom lines be damned. But for now, at least, I am admitting defeat: Privacy does not matter to most of us, apparently; the companies clearly do not care.
So rather than join Block and Honan in their futile act of consumer disobedience, I’m throwing in the towel, then taking a picture of it, slapping on a sweet filter, and posting the photo all over the Web for everyone to see.
John, you work in advertising and don’t understand why someone would want to create an interest in their brand without selling something? Interesting.
Donavan- I hope you enjoyed that check from Instagram. TOOL
Lousy images.
I don’t use it but I would see the advertising as a side issue you can live with, or not. The photo side is a ;privacy’ aspect of your personal data. Regardless of your photographs worth; many of us wouldn’t want ALL our photos made available for whatever reason. And remember there’s probably more chance of your photo turning up somewhere for a cheap laugh than some serious professional statement. If you’re happy for some drunken mugshot to appear in years to come then go for it. Otherwise you need to weigh up the risks. I can’t see the point in risking it. Personal to me, and personal to a small group is way different to open viewing (which could be the next step at this rate).
Never had
And I’m SURE you’re a professional photographer. I work in advertising and have worked with some great photographers, and NOT ONE of them would give their work away for free. No matter how it was created.
Cuz it sucks and is lame. Its just facebook for people who cant read
Yes. With FB in control, it will soon become just another advertising outlet for them. Ads in my IG feed isn’t something I care to see. And with FB constant changing privacy controls, it becomes just another site to keep up with rather than enjoy. Fun while it lasted tho..
Never joined it. Didnt see the point.
Because Flickr got better
vision
I quite because I didn’t need to see more pictures of sunsets and plates of food. :-)
I’m a professional photographer and an instagram user. I don’t mind if instagram uses my images. My instagram images are taken with my iPhone and while I am proud of some of my instagram shots, I don’t consider them my “work”. We live in a transparent society where everything is public. This is just the way the cookie crumbles. Privacy went on the decline with the invention of the internet and it’s more than on the decline now, it’s dead as a doornail. That’s just the nature of being alive in 2013.
was never there in the first place, FB should know, personal data is personal. FB can have myspace fate with a wrong business move.
Already left. Any company that even thinks they own my stuff will not get my business.
Yes, Because I never started, same with Pinterest, every year there is to or three new big things that take off. Tired of changing features, privacy policies, not knowing which companies that are popular today will fade into the sunset tomorrow. so on and so on
Deleted immediately upon the news of the new TOS. I wasn’t an avid user anyway. While I would love to do away with fb, it seems nearly impossible, if not completely impractical, to do so. You can deactivate an account, but there doesn’t seem to be a way to truly delete it.
What price should we pay for the services Facebook and Instagram provide us with? I don’t pay anything and I get quite a bit from these companies. If they want to use some of my imagery for profit, I think it’s fair.
Uninstalled the app the moment I went through the user interface. It wasn’t for me and I couldn’t socialize through pictures of cats and food… that was awkward.
whats the point of this stupid article? I thought news was supposed to attempt to show me something I didnt know.