Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Google Calendar just fixed one of its most irritating bugs

Add as a preferred source on Google

If you like to combine Google Calendar with your Microsoft Outlook account, we’ve got some good news: Google has finally fixed an issue that has been plaguing the two services for way too long.

Previously, if you were to organize a meeting in Outlook, you would frequently find that your name was missing from the list of attendees in Google Calendar. This would obviously be confusing for other users, as it would seem that you weren’t planning on showing up to a meeting you were known to be organizing.

Google Calendar shown on a computer monitor.
Digital Trends

However, Google has just announced on its company blog that the problem has been fixed and that your name should start showing up where it’s meant to be. According to the search giant, you don’t need to take any action to take advantage of this remedy (whether you’re an admin or an end user), as the changes should come through automatically.

Recommended Videos

Google says the fix started rolling out yesterday (August 24), and will continue to be propagated gradually over the following 15 days. So, if you don’t see the change immediately, it should be with you soon enough.

Moto G Stylus 5G 2023 in Outlook.
Christine Romero-Chan / Digital Trends

The resolution of this pesky bug comes two weeks after Microsoft fixed another irritating problem with Outlook. Earlier in August, the company made it much easier to send large files to other users. Now, instead of constantly bumping up against attachment file size limits, you’ll be able to simply upload your files to OneDrive and share a link from there.

And now that Google has addressed the issue of meeting organizers’ names not appearing in the list of attendees, it should relieve a notable pain point that has affected users for some time now. Sure, not everyone uses the combination of Microsoft Outlook and Google Calendar when trying to create meetings, but huge numbers of people do. With this fix, things should be a lot easier going forward.

So instead of wondering why your colleague apparently isn’t attending a meeting they just told you they were coming to, you should now be able to see their name nestled in among the other participants.

Alex Blake
Alex Blake has been working with Digital Trends since 2019, where he spends most of his time writing about Mac computers…
Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor review: A workstation in a single display
A massive 52-inch display, Thunderbolt docking and thoughtful productivity features make the Dell UltraSharp 52 much more than just another oversized monitor.
Computer Hardware, Electronics, Hardware

See at Dell

Quick Recap

Read more
Google’s new Pixel Tag is slimmer than an AirTag and smarter at finding your stuff
Google didn’t copy Apple’s playbook after all.
Wood, Accessories, Bag

I'll admit, tile-style trackers rarely excite me, primarily because most just copy the AirTag and call it a day. Google's first swing at the category breaks that pattern a little. 

The Pixel Tag launched today as the slimmest tracker on the market, backed by a Bluetooth trick neither Apple nor Samsung currently offers.

Read more
Datamaxxing is the latest AI trend, and for once, it could be good for your health goals
Feeding fitness data to AI can turn unexplained health metrics into useful conversations, but trusting it as a doctor is another matter
Woman exercises with her Apple Watch and Dexcom G7.

Datamaxxing sounds like the sort of wellness trend that would involve a spreadsheet, three supplements, and far too much free time. The basic idea is much more sensible. People are feeding data from their wearables into AI chatbots and asking them to explain what all those numbers actually mean. The Wall Street Journal recently documented several people building systems around exactly that idea.

There’s a genuine gap for AI to fill here. A 2026 Nature Communications study found that wearables are good at producing summaries, but much less useful when people want personalized answers about their own data. An AI agent built by the researchers reached 84% accuracy on objective numerical questions.

Read more