Nvidia’s RTX 4070 Ti is here, which means that the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has a direct competitor now. Comparing AMD to Nvidia is never overly straightforward, but it can be done. Benchmark results speak for themselves, and we’ve got plenty of those, all based on our own thorough testing of both cards.
While the RTX 4070 Ti and the RX 7900 XT are not some of the best graphics cards on the current market, they certainly fill important roles by offering gaming at a more affordable price — at least in theory. Below, we’ll talk about which of these GPUs is the better option if you’re looking to upgrade your PC.
Pricing and availability
When it comes to the RTX 4070 Ti, it’s a bit of a funny story, because the card was launched twice … kind of.
Initially, Nvidia announced the RTX 4070 Ti under the name of “RTX 4080 12GB.” However, after some backlash, it didn’t take long for the GPU giant to change its mind, and it promptly “unlaunched” the RTX 4080 12GB, leaving just the regular RTX 4080. However, those ill-fated 12GB versions of the RTX 4080 had already been made, so most people expected the card to make a reappearance sooner or later.
Enter the RTX 4070 Ti, a rebranded version of the card, arriving with the same specifications and a slightly lower price tag, even before anyone heard a peep about a possible RTX 4070. This is certainly unusual — we’re getting the “improved” Ti version before the base model of the card is even mentioned.
Nvidia announced the RTX 4070 Ti during its CES 2023 keynote, and the card is set to launch two days later on January 5, priced at $800. Nvidia is not releasing its own Founders Edition version of this card, though, so we expect the cards prepared by Nvidia’s add-in board (AIB) partners to cost more. We’re likely going to see it hitting prices in the $850 to $1,000 range.
AMD tends to keep the prices slightly more reasonable, but the RX 7900 XT costs more than the Nvidia card — at least in theory. Initially announced on November 3, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (as well as its more powerful sibling, the RX 7900 XTX) hit the shelves on December 13.
The RX 7900 XT, which can be called a direct competitor to the RTX 4070 Ti, costs $900, so $100 more than the Team Green GPU — but again, the actual prices for the RTX 4070 Ti may be higher than that.
Specs
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT | |
| Maximum clock | 2,610MHz | 2,000MHz |
| Memory size | 12GB GDDR6X | 20GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 192-bit | 320-bit |
| Memory speed | 21Gbps | 20Gbps |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP) | 285W | 315W |
| List price | $800 | $900 |
Nvidia’s RTX 4070 Ti is the most affordable GPU from the latest RTX 40-series “Ada Lovelace” lineup. Initially, Nvidia released the RTX 4090, quickly followed by the RTX 4080. These flagships are expensive, so the RTX 4070 Ti can be considered the first more affordable card in the lineup. However, it also comes with rather cutdown specifications in comparison to its more powerful siblings.
On the other hand, just belonging to the RTX “Ada” generation of GPUs gives the 4070 Ti some bragging rights. It gains access to Nvidia’s DLSS 3, for one, and sports excellent power efficiency — something totally unexpected from Nvidia. The GPU was built on a 4nm process.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT belongs to the RDNA 3 lineup. The Navi 31 XT GPU is based on a 5nm process, but it also borrows from AMD Ryzen processors in the sense that it combines a 5nm graphics compute die (GCD) with a 6nm memory cache die (MCD). Stacking these chiplets has some benefits, such as better performance and cheaper production costs.
Nvidia and AMD each make cards that are very different on an architectural level, so it’s hard to compare their specs on every level possible. As an example, Nvidia uses CUDA cores in its GPUs (the RTX 4070 Ti comes with 7,680), but AMD doesn’t — it has different noteworthy specs, such as shading units (5,376) and compute units (84). With that in mind, here’s what each card brings to the table.
Performance
Seeing as the RTX 4070 Ti and the RX 7900 XT are rivals, it’s only right that we’ve put them through the wringer in a number of benchmarks. This gives us a good overview of how both cards compare to their previous-gen counterparts, as well as to each other, not to mention the rest of the current GPU market.
In synthetic benchmarks, the RX 7900 XT wins, albeit only slightly. We’re looking at a 10% lead over the RTX 4070 Ti. At list price, the Nvidia offering is around 11% cheaper, but again, we don’t know whether that price will hold true. If both cards cost roughly the same, then AMD takes the lead due to better performance.
Of course, things should be different where ray tracing is concerned. Typically, Nvidia destroyed AMD in every single ray tracing scenario — that was perfectly clear in our matchup of the two flagships, the RTX 4090 and the RX 7900 XTX. However, the RTX 4070 Ti doesn’t quite hit that same mark. In 3DMark Port Royal, the RTX 4070 Ti proved to be just 3% better than the RX 7900 XT.
Synthetic benchmarks are one thing, but what truly matters is real-world performance, and for cards like these, that often equals gaming. Nvidia advertises the RTX 4070 Ti as a 1440p card, but we gave it a spin in 4K and found that it lags behind the RX 7900 XT, let alone the other Nvidia Ada Lovelace cards. At 4K, the RTX 4070 Ti was 11% slower than the RX 7900 XT.
Dialing it back to 1440p, the RTX 4070 Ti finds its footing and fares better. In our testing, it was around 8% slower than the AMD RX 7900 XT. On the other hand, it did a great job against its own predecessor, beating the RTX 3070 Ti by 40%.
We’re seeing similar (but better) results if we go down to 1080p gaming, but you shouldn’t be buying the RTX 4070 Ti or the RX 7900 XT strictly for 1080p — cards from the previous generation can handle that resolution at much more agreeable prices.
Trying out ray tracing in games instead of in a synthetic test gives the RTX 4070 Ti a lead over AMD, but only slightly. At 4K, the card struggles, somewhat unsurprisingly. It’s barely faster than the RX 7900 XTX, but it does have a bigger lead over the RX 7900 XT.
At 1440p, the RTX 4070 Ti managed to maintain an average of 68.6 frames per second (fps) compared to the 57.9 fps averaged by its AMD counterpart. It’s an improvement, to be sure, but it’s not a jaw-dropping victory along the likes of the RTX 4090 and the RTX 4080.
An unexpected turn of events
With all the benchmarks out of the way, the question remains — which of these cards is the better one to buy? The answer is tricky and not quite as clearcut as one might like it to be.
The truth is that the RTX 4070 Ti and the RX 7900 XT have one thing in common — they’re not the shining stars of their respective lineups. The AMD RX 7900 XT is completely overshadowed by the RX 7900 XTX, which offers better performance and is a much better deal at $1,000. Nvidia’s RTX 4070 Ti, on the other hand, was such a big miss at first that Nvidia had to launch it again, this time under a different name and with a cheaper price tag.
In a way, the RTX 4070 Ti does a good job of making the RX 7900 XT appear more desirable. Yes, the AMD card is more expensive, but the RTX 4070 Ti might turn out to cost more in the long run — it all depends on how the market reacts to the launch and whether Nvidia’s AIBs drive up the price or not.
Performance-wise, the AMD card wins, but not by a large margin. Nvidia’s card gives you access to slightly better ray tracing, as well as DLSS 3, and in theory, it should be $100 cheaper.
If you can get the RTX 4070 Ti near the list price, it’s most likely a better deal, but ultimately, whichever GPU you end up choosing, you’ll get similar levels of performance, and both cards are fully capable of 1440p gaming with some 4K added into the mix.
Editors' Recommendations
- AMD’s canceled GPU could have crushed Nvidia
- The Nvidia RTX 4080 Super just trounced AMD
- I tested AMD’s RX 7600 XT against the RTX 4060 — and I was shocked by the results
- RTX 4080 Super vs. RTX 4070 Ti Super vs. RTX 4070 Super: Nvidia’s new GPUs, compared
- AMD has another new GPU that it says can beat the RTX 4060 Ti
