Skip to main content

Here’s why a MacBook Pro with AMD’s new Ryzen 4 chips would be amazing

AMD’s powerful, super-efficient chips are perfect for the MacBook Pro

The 13-inch MacBook Pro calls itself a “pro” device. But with just a quad-core processor under the hood, you don’t expect it to help you out much in the world content creation. What if it was, let’s say, twice as powerful? That’d be nice.

But it’s not just a fantasy. AMD’s new Ryzen 4000 processors would allow a device like the 13-inch MacBook Pro to get up to eight cores and sixteen threads, all without increasing 15-watt power draw.

That got me thinking: What if Apple decided to ditch Intel and go with Ryzen for its MacBook Pro in 2020? Could this be the answer to the MacBook Pro’s well-publicized processor woes?

Losing patience with Intel

Image used with permission by copyright holder

It’s no secret that Apple has been largely dissatisfied with Intel in recent times, and not just in terms of MacBook parts. The chip maker has struggled to deliver its processors on time to Apple, leading to Macs launching with last-generation parts in order to just get the products out the door.

And that’s not the only problem — the MacBook Pro 13 is still stuck on quad-core chips, likely because Intel can’t get its more powerful processors to run cool enough in such a small enclosure.

The power alone isn’t enough for an Apple product. Over the years, Mac users have also come to expect a near-silent experience with their laptop. That means Apple has more stringent heat requirements for its processors than other laptop makers. It’s also one reason why the MacBook’s enclosure is 100% metal — the whole chassis acts as a giant heatsink, minimizing the need for spaceship-grade cooling fans.

The jump from a quad-core Intel processor to an eight-core, sixteen-thread AMD chip could be monumental.

All of this is why AMD’s new processors are potentially so exciting. They offer up significantly more power than the Intel chips in the current MacBook Pro 13, while maintaining the minimal power draw levels that Apple so often demands. That means they could be the processors to take the MacBook Pro to the next level, especially in tasks that can use those extra cores like video editing.

The MacBook Pro is meant to be a pro-level device — the clue is in the name, after all. Merely being on par with other premium laptops isn’t good enough for a company that touts the MacBook Pro 13 as a “portable powerhouse.”

The jump from a quad-core Intel processor to an eight-core, sixteen-thread AMD chip could be monumental. You’d be able to get a genuinely powerful machine that’s small enough to chuck in your backpack, and getting pro-level performance would no longer require shelling out over $2,000 for the MacBook Pro 16.

Speaking of the MacBook Pro 16, Apple’s latest laptop came with an all-new cooling system that allowed its internal components to truly shine. If Apple decided to pair that with a low-power, all-performance AMD 4800U chip in the MacBook Pro 13, we’d have a fantastic little machine on our hands.


MacOS Catalina Hands-on | Macbook Pro
Dan Baker/Digital Trends

All of this is just fantasizing of course. There’s no indication that Apple would make such a move. Yes, Apple has been looking for alternatives to Intel — but the rumor mill has been pointing more toward Apple creating its own ARM-based processors for its MacBook line.

Apple uses ARM-based A-series chips in its iPhones and iPads, and these have already proven to be by far the best mobile processors on the market, so it knows what it’s doing when it comes to making its own chips. Doing everything in-house would also eliminate the frustrating need to rely on a delay-prone company like Intel. So, that means the AMD speculation goes out the window, right?

Well, not exactly. Apple may find it tough to convince pro users to ditch the high-end Intel Core i9 processors they’re used to for relatively unproven ARM chips, but this is precisely the area where AMD’s latest processors could pick up the slack. If Apple were to put its own ARM chips in its entry-level and mid-range laptops and reserve AMD’s finest for the MacBook Pro, it could score wins on both fronts.

It’d still be relying on a third-party company to provide the guts of the MacBook Pro, but Apple and AMD already enjoy a very close and fruitful relationship. AMD provides all of the discrete graphics cards for the MacBook Pro and iMac, so it wouldn’t be a particularly big step for it to provide the CPUs as well. With new 5600m and 5700m mobile GPUs on the way (with impressive benchmarks, if the leaks are to be trusted), the future could be bright for an Apple-AMD partnership.

Right now, this is all speculation, so take it with a grain of salt. But with AMD on the rise and Apple in desperate need of better processors for the MacBook Pro 13, this could be the perfect time for it to make the switch.

Follow our live blog for more CES news and announcements.

Editors' Recommendations

Alex Blake
In ancient times, people like Alex would have been shunned for their nerdy ways and strange opinions on cheese. Today, he…
I needed to buy a new MacBook. Here’s why I bought a power bank instead
Baseus Blade 2 65W power bank for laptops kept on a green couch.

I rely on a 13-inch MacBook Pro from 2020 for most of my work. Despite its age and being a base variant model, it continues to stack up well against my expectations for all these years.

Since MacBooks are known for longevity, the fact that my MacBook Pro still holds up well a few years later shouldn't sound surprising. However, the first signs of aging recently arrived in the form of a warning about the battery's plummeting health. I was already dreading the idea of having to replace what was otherwise a perfectly good laptop.

Read more
Apple quietly backtracks on the MacBook Air’s biggest issue
The MacBook Air on a white table.

The new MacBook Air with M3 chip not only allows you to use it with two external displays, but it has also reportedly addressed a storage problem that plagued the previous M2 model. The laptop now finally has much faster storage performance since Apple has switched back to using two 128GB NAND modules instead of a single 256GB module on the SSD drive.

This was discovered by the YouTuber Max Tech, who tore down the entry-level model of the MacBook Air M3 with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. In his tests, thanks to the two NAND modules, the M3 MacBook Air is nearly double faster than the M2 MacBook Air. Blackmagic Disk Speed tests show that the older M2 model with the problematic NAND chip had a 1584.3 Mb/s write speed, and the newer M3 model had 2108.9 Mb/s for the M3 model, for a 33% difference. In read speeds, it was 1576.4 Mb/s on the old model and 2880.2 Mb/s on the newer model.

Read more
Why gaming on the M3 MacBook Air has left me impressed
Baldur's Gate 3 being played on the M3 MacBook Air.

Upon getting the new MacBook Air M3 in my possession, I had one major question: Can you play games on it?

That might sound like a silly first thought for a laptop of this type. After all, it's not marketed as a gaming laptop -- it's an incredibly thin, fanless laptop. Not exactly something even meant for any high-performance tasks.

Read more