Skip to main content

Windows 8.1 and XP market share falls, while Windows 7 gains users

Windows XP is no longer supported, and according to Net Marketshare’s latest statistics, it appears that some people are moving to other operating systems as a result. However, unfortunately for Microsoft, many people are moving off of XP while actively sidestepping Windows 8.1. They’re probably also waiting for Windows 9, which could be released as soon as 2015.

For the month of July, Windows 8.1’s desktop share stood at 6.56 percent. That’s a minor drop from 6.61 percent in June, but a drop nonetheless. Meanwhile, Windows 8’s share fell from 5.93 percent in June, to 5.92 percent last month, a teeny tiny decrease of 0.01 percent. Combined, Windows 8 and 8.1 occupy 12.48 percent of the desktop OS pie as of July. That’s not much, considering that Windows XP occupies roughly double that, despite the fact that it’s well over 10 years old.

Speaking of Windows XP, though it’s still quite popular, some PC users left it behind last month. Windows XP’s desktop share fell from 25.31 percent in June, to 24.82 percent last month. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean that the fall will continue unabated. After all, Windows XP’s share actually rose in June, up from 25.27 in May.

Then, there’s the big cheese, the head honcho, the big kahuna; Windows 7. Windows 7’s share spiked in July to 51.22 percent. That’s up from 50.55 percent in June, which is an increase of 0.67 percent.

To us, the reasons for Windows XP’s and 7’s continued dominance over Windows 8 and 8.1 are simple. The first two operating systems have a Start menu and provide a familiar experience to users. Windows 8 and 8.1 don’t, though a Metro-ified version of the Start menu is likely to return in Windows 9. Then, of course, is the issue of cost. Windows 7 costs the same as Windows 8.1 does on Newegg; roughly $100. Most people clearly prefer to use the OS with a Start menu, even if it’s approaching five years of age.

The usage numbers for both Windows 8 and 8.1 are weak, and will likely remain that way forever.

Editors' Recommendations

Konrad Krawczyk
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Konrad covers desktops, laptops, tablets, sports tech and subjects in between for Digital Trends. Prior to joining DT, he…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more