Skip to main content

Game publisher Take-Two doesn’t think that loot boxes are gambling

Star Wars Battlefront II
Loot boxes in video games have been a contentious topic over the last few months, as more and more titles relegate progression systems and rewards to what is essentially a randomized form of gambling — but if you were to ask Grand Theft Auto V and NBA 2K18 publisher Take-Two about loot boxes, it would have a different definition of gambling.

Speaking at a Credit Suisse event (via GameSpot), Take-Two president Karl Slatoff said that the company “[doesn’t] view [loot boxes] as gambling,” echoing statements made by the Entertainment Software Board.

Related Videos

Earlier this month, the ESA released a statement to Glixel, saying that “loot boxes are a voluntary feature in certain video games that provide players with another way to obtain virtual items that can be used to enhance their in-game experience,” and insisted that they weren’t gambling, in large part because they are optional.

That might be the case in single-player games like Middle-earth: Shadow of War or when they’re for purely cosmetic items as they are in Overwatch, but this argument doesn’t seem to apply to Star Wars: Battlefront II. The game was initially scheduled to launch with a special currency that could be acquired using real money, which could then be spent on loot boxes that would exponentially increase the rate at which players could improve their character’s abilities. This put players who didn’t want to spend cash at a disadvantage, as they would have to play for hours on end in order to have the chance to earn similar stats.

At a Credit Suisse conference, Electronic Arts CFO Blake Jorgensen said that cosmetic items were not included in loot boxes in Battlefront II in order to avoid “violating the canon” of the franchise. He said the company needed to create a balance between those “with more time than money” and those “with more money than time.”

What Jorgensen is describing sounds a lot like the dreaded  “pay-to-win” EA needs to avoid, but it might not be the consumers that ultimately decide the fate of loot boxes in games. After the Belgian Gaming Commission opened an investigation into the practice, Hawaii state congressman Chris Lee announced he was investigating “predatory behavior” from game publishers, as well.

Editors' Recommendations

Sony doesn’t need an Xbox Game Pass killer — it already has one
PS4 (Playstation 4) using PS Now.

PlayStation Now was the first major step in game streaming services. Yes, we had plenty of other attempts with services like OnLive (which I also tried back in 2010), but none ever had the weight of a massive corporation behind it. Sony acquired the service formerly known as Gaikai in 2012 and transformed it into its very own exclusive streaming service that it's been working on to this day.

The thing is, after that initial purchase push, Sony has been pretty silent about PS Now. It's quietly gained 3.2 million subscribers as of March 2021, which isn't all that much when you compare it to the number of PS+ subscribers but is still a substantial number.

Read more
Why Steam Deck doesn’t stack up to Xbox Game Pass Ultimate on Android
A player using a Steam Deck on a couch.

The promise of handheld PC gaming has always been something of a siren's call for manufacturers. From the defunct Nvidia Shield Portable to Dell's prototype Alienware Concept UFO, and the profusion of Kickstarted vaporware products, many have tried over the years, and many have failed.

Valve is a more prominent name in the game in some ways, with Steam as the single biggest PC gaming platform in the world despite Epic's aspirations. It's only logical that the company would try to launch the Steam Deck, a Switch-like portable console that should be in the hands of gamers by December. But Valve hardly has the best track record with hardware, as anyone that purchased one of its Steam Machines, Steam Box, or Steam Controller can attest to.

Read more
Indie developers are changing the definition of cinematic in video games
Last Stop

Over the past decade, the word cinematic has become a cliché in video games. It’s a term that’s come to describe big-budget studio games like The Last of Us Part 2. Have a big action set piece? That’s cinematic. Expensive cutscenes that look like a Michael Bay movie? Cinematic. Characters with any semblance of depth. Pure cinema!

The word has lost its meaning, transforming into a genre label that describes a very specific type of Hollywood-sized action game. But film is a wide media that encompasses much more than just blockbusters. There are plenty of other elements that video games can borrow from movies to create richer storytelling experiences.

Read more