Skip to main content

Game publisher Take-Two doesn’t think that loot boxes are gambling

Star Wars Battlefront II
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Loot boxes in video games have been a contentious topic over the last few months, as more and more titles relegate progression systems and rewards to what is essentially a randomized form of gambling — but if you were to ask Grand Theft Auto V and NBA 2K18 publisher Take-Two about loot boxes, it would have a different definition of gambling.

Speaking at a Credit Suisse event (via GameSpot), Take-Two president Karl Slatoff said that the company “[doesn’t] view [loot boxes] as gambling,” echoing statements made by the Entertainment Software Board.

Earlier this month, the ESA released a statement to Glixel, saying that “loot boxes are a voluntary feature in certain video games that provide players with another way to obtain virtual items that can be used to enhance their in-game experience,” and insisted that they weren’t gambling, in large part because they are optional.

That might be the case in single-player games like Middle-earth: Shadow of War or when they’re for purely cosmetic items as they are in Overwatch, but this argument doesn’t seem to apply to Star Wars: Battlefront II. The game was initially scheduled to launch with a special currency that could be acquired using real money, which could then be spent on loot boxes that would exponentially increase the rate at which players could improve their character’s abilities. This put players who didn’t want to spend cash at a disadvantage, as they would have to play for hours on end in order to have the chance to earn similar stats.

At a Credit Suisse conference, Electronic Arts CFO Blake Jorgensen said that cosmetic items were not included in loot boxes in Battlefront II in order to avoid “violating the canon” of the franchise. He said the company needed to create a balance between those “with more time than money” and those “with more money than time.”

What Jorgensen is describing sounds a lot like the dreaded  “pay-to-win” EA needs to avoid, but it might not be the consumers that ultimately decide the fate of loot boxes in games. After the Belgian Gaming Commission opened an investigation into the practice, Hawaii state congressman Chris Lee announced he was investigating “predatory behavior” from game publishers, as well.

Editors' Recommendations

Gabe Gurwin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Gabe Gurwin has been playing games since 1997, beginning with the N64 and the Super Nintendo. He began his journalism career…
All 3 big console companies will require loot boxes to disclose odds of winning
Loot boxes in different games like Fortnite, Rocket League, PUBG, Dota 2

Loot boxes have been a controversial inclusion in video games ever since they began appearing in shooters like Overwatch, but the process of opening them could be a little more transparent on consoles in the future. Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony will soon require loot boxes in games to disclose the odds of winning, which could encourage publishers to adjust the numbers.

According to, Michael Warnecke, Entertainment Software Association chief counsel of tech policy, made this information public during the Federal Trade Commisssion's Inside the Game workshop on August 7. Warnecke said the new policies on all three companies' systems would require that games share the chance of obtaining rare items.

Read more
Loot boxes? EA vice president prefers you call them surprise mechanics
electronic arts legal trouble loot boxes ea over fifa

A senior Electronic Arts executive said that loot boxes are “surprise mechanics” like Kinder Eggs and that they are “quite ethical and quite fun.”

Speaking before the U.K. Parliament’s Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport Committee, EA vice president of legal and government affairs Kerry Hopkins wouldn’t even use the term “loot box” when asked if they’re ethical.

Read more
Video game lobbying group trashes proposed anti-loot box bill
fortnite save the world loot boxes reveal contents before buying

The ESA, the trade association of the video game industry, roundly condemns a proposed bill that likens loot boxes in today's games to a form of legalized gambling for children -- issuing a blistering statement Thursday that ridiculed its assertions.

“This legislation is flawed and riddled with inaccuracies. It does not reflect how video games work nor how our industry strives to deliver innovative and compelling entertainment experiences to our audiences," ESA CEO Stanley Pierre-Louis said in a statement released Thursday, May 23. "The impact of this bill would be far-reaching and ultimately prove harmful to the player experience, not to mention the more than 220,000 Americans employed by the video game industry. We encourage the bill’s co-sponsors to work with us to raise awareness about the tools and information in place that keep the control of video game play and in-game spending in parents’ hands rather than in the government’s.”

Read more