Chicago’s new cloud tax forces Netflix subscribers to pay 9 percent more

Watching Netflix
Unfortunate for residents of Chicago, the city’s amusement tax will be extended to streaming entertainment services like Netflix, Spotify, Hulu or Apple Music. Basically attaching to any cloud-based service that delivers entertainment to subscribers, companies like Netflix will have to include the tax in the subscription price and collect an additional nine percent for the city of Chicago. The change in the tax code also applies to “nonpossessory computer leases,” specifically to include remote computing platforms like cloud-based services.

This new tax is estimated to bring in an additional $12 million a year for the city of Chicago, although the effectiveness of the tax is highly dependent on the number of streaming subscribers that live in the Chicago area. By design, this new tax has been implemented to combat the downturn of physical media purchases as well as the shrinking number of stores to purchase or rent entertainment. On other words, Chicago wants to collect tax on Netflix because Blockbuster has gone the way of the dodo.

A Netflix subscriber in Chicago will probably see their bill increase from $8.99 a month to $9.80 a month. Over an entire year, that will cost a subscriber roughly $117.60 instead of $107.88. It will be difficult for any Chicago resident to evade the new tax as collection will likely be tied to a user’s billing address. Of course, companies that manage cloud services within Chicago can simply move their company to a new city in order to avoid paying an additional 9 percent each month.

Detailed by the Chicago Tribune, streaming entertainment companies will have until September 1, 2015 to start collecting and paying the tax. Speaking about the implementation of the new tax, Chicago alderman Ameya Pawar said “A lot of these online companies, their whole business model seems to be to get around the tax code, and to me that’s no business model at all. This is a step toward trying to correct that situation, and toward making sure the existing code reflects the realities of the marketplace.”

Editors' Recommendations