Skip to main content

Five Reasons the Microsoft Zune is Dead

Image used with permission by copyright holder
Less than three years after Microsoft launched the first Zune players amongst a blizzard of PR confetti and smack talk about trouncing Apple’s vaunted iPod, the Zune name has turned into its own punch line. The marketing explosion fizzled, the bad reviews flooded in, and the only mention “Zune” gets nowadays is usually in reference to imaginary future products. Which is why we’re ready to put a cap on this money pit: It’s done. Here’s why we think Microsoft will drag Zune behind the shed, put it out of its misery, and bury it alongside the Office paperclip.

5. A credit system for music sucks.

Recommended Videos

Buying Microsoft’s artificial “Zune Points” currency to in turn buy music from the Zune Store can’t help but remind us of forking over cold cash for tokens at Chuck E. Cheese. It’s a thinly veiled sham designed to get you to spend more than your really want to. And when you have to buy points in chunks, as Microsoft forces you to, it works. Aside from the utter frustration of not knowing how much you’re spending for any given song or album, you’ll never be able to spend the last few points in your account, keeping you from ever truly getting your money’s worth.

Zune Points

Zune Points

4. Nobody builds Zune accessories.

The aftermarket for iPod accessories has become so amazing so lush with diverse products at this point that it’s practically threatening to implode on itself. You can buy everything from speaker docks to FM transmitters, purses, belt buckles and toilet paper holders to dock with an iPod. Heck, many new cars will even support the devices natively. With the Zune, you can get… a handful of pretty tame stuff, most of which is made by Microsoft itself. And until Zune gets more than the 2.1 percent market share it currently holds (compared to Apple’s 71 percent and even SanDisk’s 10.5 percent), you won’t see companies rushing to pump out anything for it.

Zune Accessories

Zune Accessories

3. There’s no price break.

When you’re running up against a product as popular and solidly entrenched as the iPod, you need to undercut it significantly on price if you expect anyone to even look at your version. Microsoft hasn’t figured this out. The 8GB Zune only costs $10 less than its much sexier Apple equivalent, and if you step up to a 120GB Zune, that gap not only diminishes, it reverses. The Zune 120 actually costs a dollar more than the Apple iPod Classic 120GB. What incentive is there for a buyer to even consider deviating from the safe status quo when there’s little or no discount for it?

120GB Zune

120GB Zune

2. Microsoft is the anti-hip.

Music players are as much about fashion as they are about silicon and circuits. And in that arena, Microsoft’s name holds about as much cool factor as off-brand clothes from Wal-Mart – a reputation it probably won’t be able to shake. Chief dork Bill Gates remains the face of the corporation even though he’s no longer CEO, and Apple has done a good job nailing that geeky impression down even further with its Mac vs. PC ad campaign. No matter how many chic-looking urbanites Microsoft slaps all over its colorful ads, the brand is perpetually stuck in a cubicle cage.

Mac vs. PC

PC vs. Mac

1. Apple is miles ahead of the game on the tech front.

Apple redefined what a portable music player was capable of in September 2007 with the release of the first-generation iPod Touch, which was as much a platform for apps, games and Internet browsing as it was for music. But in the year and a half since, Microsoft hasn’t rolled out a Zune even remotely competitive with it. Even if it does in the near future (which recent details from ZDNet suggest), it remains in the position of chasing Apple. Microsoft needs to innovate on its own, anticipating what features consumers want and delivering them before anybody else, rather than just emulating Apple’s success. (Sorry, Zune-to-Zune syncing doesn’t count. We said, “features consumers want.”)

iPod Touch

iPod Touch

Nick Mokey
As Digital Trends’ Editor in Chief, Nick Mokey oversees an editorial team covering every gadget under the sun, along with…
Don’t buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. 4 reasons to wait for the Galaxy S26 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 series closeup

Samsung’s latest Unpacked event has wrapped up, and with it, we’ve been introduced to the Galaxy S25 series. As expected, the lineup includes the standard Galaxy S25, the middle-tier S25 Plus, and the flagship Galaxy S25 Ultra. Packed with impressive hardware like the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, AI-driven features, and camera enhancements, the Galaxy S25 Ultra is undoubtedly a powerful device.
But is it worth upgrading to right now? Depending on your current phone, you might find these updates more incremental than groundbreaking. There are compelling reasons to consider holding off until next year’s Galaxy S26 Ultra. Let’s break down why waiting might be the smarter move.

A massive 200MP periscope telephoto camera

Read more
25 years ago, this wild sci-fi action movie made headlines for all the wrong reasons
supernova 25th anniversary 2000 movie screenshot 11

You know how some movies are misunderstood at the time of their release and receive a much-needed re-evaluation decades later, with film enthusiasts reclaiming them as masterpieces of their genre? Well, Supernova isn't that. In fact, it wouldn't be an overstatement to call it among the worst sci-fi movies of the noughties, and considering the decade produced such trainwrecks as The Adventures of Pluto Nash and Battlefield Earth, it's not an easy contest.

Yes, Supernova might not be as infamous as those other two movies, but maybe it should be. A hot mess if there ever was one, Supernova is a cautionary tale of bad CGI, conflicting visions, studio interference, a carousel of directors, and a script that never really knew what it wanted to be. On its 25th anniversary, let's look back at this deliciously terrible movie and discuss how the behind-the-scenes drama is far more entertaining than anything that actually happens on the screen.
Softcore sci-fi

Read more
The iPhone 17 may get one of the biggest design changes in five years
An image of the back of an iPhone 16.

The iPhone has had a distinctive look since its initial release in 2007. Sure, the sizes have changed, as have materials, but you can generally glance at an iPhone of any generation and say, "Yeah, that's an iPhone." Now, a rumor suggests that the iPhone 17 could draw inspiration from its predecessors and bring back the curved edges that have appeared several times throughout the generations.

Leaker Fixed-Focus Digital shared on Weibo (a Chinese social media platform) that the iPhone 17 would reintroduce the rounded sides of the first few iPhones, doing away with the straight edges current models have. Some fans find the straight sides less comfortable to hold, although a case can make a big difference in how the phone feels in your hand. Fixed-Focus Digital doesn't share further details, but Apple tends to differentiate its premium lineup from the base models. The design change could apply only to the base versions of the iPhone 17, to only the Pro and Pro Max versions, or to every version.

Read more