Skip to main content

U.S. lawmakers are asking Amazon if Alexa collects data on children

When Amazon released its Kids Edition of the Amazon Echo Dot, many were interested to see how Amazon would use technology to allow young children to experience technology in a kid-friendly way. Along with the kids’ version of the Echo Dot came Amazon FreeTime on Alexa, an Alexa experience created specifically for the youngest generation. Amazon even introduced a Magic Word update that aims to instill kids with good manners by requiring them to say “please” for certain commands.

While some were thrilled at the opportunity to introduce their children to this kid-friendly Alexa, other parents raised their eyebrows, questioning whether children’s privacy would be at risk. And it seems lawmakers have similar questions. Sen. Edward J. Mark (Massachusetts) and Rep. Joe Barton (Texas) have asked the Seattle-based online retailer giant what the company is doing to protect the privacy of young children who use the Amazon Echo Dot Kids’ Edition or Amazon Freetime.

Recommended Videos

In a letter, the lawmakers asked Amazon whether or not children’s interactions with the device are saved by the company or shared with any third parties.”There is also increasing concern about the effects of digital media and technology use among children and teens,” read the letter. Sen. Mark and Rep. Barton also asked Amazon whether the teams who created the device consulted with child development experts while designing it.

Amazon responded to some of these concerns in a statement. The company told CNET, “Amazon takes privacy and security seriously, and FreeTime on Alexa is no different.” The tech giant then went on to explain that parents can delete their children’s recordings from the device and from the company’s servers, and assured parents that no developers outside of Amazon will ever have access to the recordings. The speaker will also only record sounds after it’s prompted by the wake word. To prevent that from happening in advertently, parents can press the mute button on top of the device, so children don’t accidentally wake the device without meaning to.

According to Amazon, the company adheres to the “Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act,” which states that companies must provide a “clear and comprehensive online privacy policy describing their information practices for personal information collected online from children.” Companies must also “obtain verifiable parental consent, with limited exceptions, before collecting personal information” from kids. Amazon must provide a full response to lawmakers’ questions by June 1.

Data privacy has been a part of the national conversation for years, and the issue has only become more prominent in recent months following high-profile data leaks, including Facebook’s scandal involving Cambridge Analytica.

Gia Liu
Former Contributor
Google just gave vision to AI, but it’s still not available for everyone
Gemini Live App on the Galaxy S25 Ultra broadcast to a TV showing the Gemini app with the camera feature open

Google has just officially announced the roll out of a powerful Gemini AI feature that means the intelligence can now see.

This started in March as Google began to show off Gemini Live, but it's now become more widely available.

Read more
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more