AMD RX 5700 XT vs. Nvidia RTX 2060 Super

Can AMD's new 5700 XT beat out Nvidia's Super charged RTX 2060?

Nvidia RTX 2060 Super and RTX 2070 Super review
Dan Baker/Digital Trends

Summer 2019 has proved an exciting one for gamers and hardware enthusiasts, because not only do we have some amazing new CPUs from AMD to play with, but brand new graphics cards from AMD and Nvidia. The new Super RTX cards feel deliberately held back to steal AMD’s thunder, but whether they succeeded is another matter entirely.

So, to find out if they do, let’s take a look at the AMD RX 5700 XT vs. Nvidia RTX 2060 Super in a classic head to head.


Although AMD and Nvidia’s graphics cards have differing architectures where not every specification is directly comparable, some elements are and all help create a picture of the performance potential of both cards.

Radeon RX 5700 XT RTX 2060 Super
Process node 7nm 12nm
Shader units 2,560 stream processors 2,176 CUDA cores
Tensor cores N/A 272
RT Cores N/A 34
Base clock 1,605MHz 1,470MHz
Boost clock 1,905MHz 1,650MHz
Memory 8GB GDDR6 8GB GDDR6
Memory speed 14Gbps 14Gbps
Bandwidth 448GBps 448GBps
TDP 225w 175w

Notable takeaways from this specifications table include the identical memory configuration and the much higher clock speed of the RX 5700 XT. It should be noted, however, the AMD has adjusted its terminology for the RX 5700 series. The “boost” clock is now the highest possible clock that can be expected during an intensive workload and may last only a fraction of a second. In reality, the 5700 XT hovers around 1,750 MHz during gaming.

There’s also a notable absence of RT and Tensor cores on the AMD card, which we’ll get to in the section on ray tracing and other features below.

But specifications don’t tell even half the story that real-world benchmark results do. Fortunately, we have plenty of those after an exhausting week of testing new hardware from both AMD and Nvidia. We tested both cards using an Intel Core i7-8086K processor, 16GB of RAM, and a 512GB M.2 SSD.

In the synthetic 3DMark benchmark we see that the 5700 XT is a worthy competitor for the RTX 2060 Super at the same price. It’s even competitive with the $680+ Radeon VII, although it falls well behind the $500 RTX 2070 Super.

Real world gaming tests were more of a mixed bag, but also showed decent potential for the RX 5700 XT. It fell behind the RTX 2060 Super at all resolutions in Fortnite, but came back strong in Battlefield V and Civilization VI. While the RTX 2060 Super was competitive with the 5700 XT at 1080p, at higher resolutions, particularly 4K, the AMD card was far more capable, delivering more than 90 FPS at the highest detail in Civilization VI, and a rock-solid 60 FPS in BF5.

Cooling and efficiency

AMD Radeon RX 5700 and 5700 XT review
Dan Baker/Digital Trends

Thanks to AMD’s big die shrink to 7nm, it has finally caught up with Nvidia on the efficiency front. The RTX 2060 Super is still the more efficient of the two, with a 50w lower TDP, but neither card is egregious in their demands — as we have seen with some previous generations of AMD cards, like the Vega 64 and Radeon VII.

Despite the lower-than-usual power draw though, the 5700 XT is still not a cool card. AMD’s use of its classic blower design is disappointing and leaves the card hot and noisy once it’s been running a game or benchmark for a while. Although blower coolers do have an advantage in systems with poor case airflow, we find it hard to believe that anyone spending $400+ on a graphics card won’t have at least a few case fans keeping the rest of their system cool.

The RTX 2060 Super, on the other hand, uses Nvidia’s dual-fan Founders Edition cooling system which isn’t fantastic, but it’s a massive improvement over AMD’s solution. If you’re going to buy a 5700 XT and care about noise levels, it should probably be one of the as-yet-unannounced third-party alternatives that should be coming down the pipe in the next month or so.

Ray tracing and image sharpening

Nvidia’s original RTX Turing release focused more on ray tracing and the hardware that enables it than raw performance. While today, we know the RTX cards are great for all sorts of gaming tasks, they remain the only commercial GPUs available that support the new lighting standard. There are only a few games that support it, even as we edge into the second-half of 2019, but the fact remains: The RTX 2060 Super can do ray tracing. The RX 5700 XT cannot… at least for now.

It can also offer deep-learning super sampling in supported games, which can help improve image quality and frame rates in select cases. AMD’s card can’t do that either, but it does have AMD’s new Fidelity FX and Image Sharpening effects, which can improve visual quality in a much wider selection of games, but without the FPS improvement of DLSS. AMD’s cards also offer a new anti-lag feature for faster gamer inputs.

The 5700 XT could be great, but…

AMD’s new RDNA-based 5700 graphics cards are far less of a dominating force than its new Ryzen CPUs, but they’re not bad either. The 5700 XT is competitively priced with the RTX 2060 Super and it performs comparably, if not far quicker in some instances, despite being the same price. If that were the whole story of these GPUs, we’d give the 5700 XT the award and call it a day.

But it isn’t. The RTX 2060 Super also offers entry-level ray tracing support and hardware accelerated DLSS. It also has a much better cooling solution, it’s quieter, and it’s more efficient.

If you want pure raw power or the best high-end card AMD offers (with FreeSync support to boot), the 5700 XT is it — don’t bother with the Radeon VII, it’s overpriced for its meager performance bump. But even then, we’d suggest waiting for the aftermarket cards. Those, with their better cooling and potentially higher clocks, could be competitive with the RTX 2070 Super. With $100 gap between that and the 5700 XT, there’s plenty of room for partner companies to make something quite special of the new Navi card.

For now though, the RTX 2060 Super remains the better graphics card overall.

Editors' Recommendations

AMD vs. Intel

AMD Ryzen 9 3900x