Skip to main content

I bought a Ryzen laptop, and I liked it

Intel has the best laptops in a full-on, stylish, WWE-style chokehold. Laptops are flopping around on the mat, meekly trying to slap away Intel’s strong, brutish arms.

If you buy a laptop, it’s probably going to have Intel Inside. You likely won’t even consider another option. You might not even know there is another option.

I’m here to tell you there is. AMD’s mobile Ryzen processors are available in many budget laptops, work just as well, and often cost less. So, should you save a few bucks and buy an AMD Ryzen laptop?

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

No sacrifice in speed

Lenovo ThinkPad E495 with AMD Ryzen
Image used with permission by copyright holder

I found myself eyeing an AMD Ryzen laptop a few months ago. The time had come to buy a new personal laptop for everyday use. My needs aren’t extravagant. I play games on a dedicated desktop, so my laptop only needs to handle Word, web browsing, and – well, that’s about it. My only demand was a USB-C 3.1 port with Power Delivery and DisplayPort for one-cable connection to my monitor. My budget? Around $600.

Lenovo’s ThinkPad E490 soon appeared on my radar. I found a system with an Intel Core i5-8265U processor, 8GB of RAM, and a 256GB processor for $640. That felt look a good deal, but it was a little more than I budgeted. Narrowing my search, I found an alternative. Lenovo’s ThinkPad E495.

The E495 was exactly $600. It had the same 8GB of RAM and the same hard drive, but the Intel Core i5-8265U was swapped for AMD’s Ryzen 7 3700U.

I was curious, but unsure. Does the Ryzen 7 3700U hold up against the Core i5-8265U? Ryzen’s reputation is solid, but AMD’s older A-Series APUs gave the company a bad rap.

Ryzen mobile also lacks the core count advantage it has on desktop. The Ryzen 7 3700U is a quad-core processor, just like the Core i5-8265U.

Yes, the Intel processor is a little quicker, but the gap isn’t large enough to notice.

Surprisingly, despite its budget pricing, the AMD Ryzen mobile processor shines. It’s slightly slower than Intel’s competition in Geekbench 5 single core, with a score of 746 against the Intel chip’s 926. But it’s basically tied in multi-core testing, with a score of 2,656 vs. 2,725.

Yea, the Intel processor is a little quicker, but a gap like that isn’t large enough to matter in everyday use. Most modern CPUs are quick enough for web browsing and basic productivity in Microsoft Office (or your Office alternative of choice). Ryzen is no exception.

AMD’s Ryzen 7 3700U even has a bonus; RX Vega 10 graphics. The Vega 10 is a modest integrated graphics solution that can’t handle most modern games, but it more than double’s the performance of Intel UHD 620 graphics (according to 3DMark Fire Strike). That gap does matter.

I’ve already used it to play older games, like Half-Life 2 and Diablo 3, at reasonable framerates. I use a gaming desktop for most my gaming needs, but if the RX Vega 10 can handle a game, I’ll play on my laptop. That wouldn’t be an option with the Intel alternative.

Don’t fret about the battery

Benchmarks eased any performance concerns I had before I purchased my ThinkPad E495, so its effortless speed isn’t a surprise. My worry was battery life. AMD’s processors have a reputation for being less efficient than Intel’s.

Despite that, battery life is fine. I’ve yet to run it dead during everyday use and, in most situations, the laptop loses about 15 percent of its charge per hour. It’ll endure six to seven hours of use.

AMD Ryzen mobile
AMD Ryzen mobile with RX Vega 10 graphics Image used with permission by copyright holder

Now, I know what you’re thinking. Six hours? That doesn’t sound great. Here’s the catch. The budget-minded ThinkPad E495’s battery is small. At 45 watt-hours, it’s 15 percent behind our favorite laptop, the Dell XPS 13. Yet the XPS 13 is smaller and lighter.

No, the E495 won’t last all day. That’s not AMD’s fault. The laptop’s endurance is adequate, and at $600, that’s not a guarantee. You can find better battery life for $600, but only if you’re willing to compromise on performance or screen size.

Why pay more?

I could’ve spent $640 on an Intel-powered ThinkPad E-Series. Instead, I saved $40 and bought the AMD Ryzen variant.

That’s good news if you’re on a budget. There’s no shortage of budget Ryzen laptops available. They’re usually less expensive than Intel alternatives, and they’ll serve you just as well.

Don’t be afraid of the unfamiliar. I have no regrets. I don’t think you will, either.

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
This DIY gaming laptop does something completely unheard of
diy gaming laptop uses only dektop parts

Fed up with the low performance of laptop processors compared to their desktop counterparts, YouTuber Socket Science set themselves the slightly ridiculous task of trying to make a gaming laptop that uses only desktop PC parts, as reported by Tom's Hardware.

The finished product is fairly bulky and doesn't have a battery -- but it is a finished product all the same and that's pretty impressive.

Read more
I tested the Ryzen 5 9600X against the best budget gaming CPU — here’s the winner
The Ryzen 5 7600X sitting among thermal paste and RAM.

AMD is back with a new budget CPU that's aiming to make it among the best gaming processors. The Ryzen 5 9600X debuts the Zen 5 architecture, and it comes with some performance improvements over last-gen's Ryzen 5 7600X. As you can read in our Ryzen 5 9600X review, however, it's not a slam dunk for AMD's latest.

Big price drops on AMD's last-gen Ryzen 5 7600X have made it a very impressive budget CPU. Although the latest Ryzen 5 9600X is clearly faster across benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 7600X stands out with an exceptional value.
By the specs

Read more
AMD’s new Ryzen 9000 CPUs are only cheaper in spirit
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X between two finger tips.

Following up on reviews for the Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X, a flurry of reports are coming out about AMD's pricing for its new Zen 5 CPUs. Across the lineup, which is sure to earn some spots among the best processors, AMD reduced prices compared to the previous generation. That's great. But it's not exactly an accurate picture of pricing right now.

First, the prices. You can see in the picture below the prices for the main four Zen 5 CPUs. Both Ryzen 9 models are $50 cheaper compared to their last-gen counterparts, the Ryzen 7 9700X is $40 cheaper, and the Ryzen 5 9600X is $20 cheaper. That's only true if you compare the list prices that AMD set. Ultimately, it's up to retailers to dictate the final price, which is something we saw in full effect with AMD's last-gen CPUs.

Read more