Skip to main content

I bought a Ryzen laptop, and I liked it

Intel has the best laptops in a full-on, stylish, WWE-style chokehold. Laptops are flopping around on the mat, meekly trying to slap away Intel’s strong, brutish arms.

If you buy a laptop, it’s probably going to have Intel Inside. You likely won’t even consider another option. You might not even know there is another option.

Recommended Videos

I’m here to tell you there is. AMD’s mobile Ryzen processors are available in many budget laptops, work just as well, and often cost less. So, should you save a few bucks and buy an AMD Ryzen laptop?

No sacrifice in speed

Lenovo ThinkPad E495 with AMD Ryzen
Image used with permission by copyright holder

I found myself eyeing an AMD Ryzen laptop a few months ago. The time had come to buy a new personal laptop for everyday use. My needs aren’t extravagant. I play games on a dedicated desktop, so my laptop only needs to handle Word, web browsing, and – well, that’s about it. My only demand was a USB-C 3.1 port with Power Delivery and DisplayPort for one-cable connection to my monitor. My budget? Around $600.

Lenovo’s ThinkPad E490 soon appeared on my radar. I found a system with an Intel Core i5-8265U processor, 8GB of RAM, and a 256GB processor for $640. That felt look a good deal, but it was a little more than I budgeted. Narrowing my search, I found an alternative. Lenovo’s ThinkPad E495.

The E495 was exactly $600. It had the same 8GB of RAM and the same hard drive, but the Intel Core i5-8265U was swapped for AMD’s Ryzen 7 3700U.

I was curious, but unsure. Does the Ryzen 7 3700U hold up against the Core i5-8265U? Ryzen’s reputation is solid, but AMD’s older A-Series APUs gave the company a bad rap.

Ryzen mobile also lacks the core count advantage it has on desktop. The Ryzen 7 3700U is a quad-core processor, just like the Core i5-8265U.

Yes, the Intel processor is a little quicker, but the gap isn’t large enough to notice.

Surprisingly, despite its budget pricing, the AMD Ryzen mobile processor shines. It’s slightly slower than Intel’s competition in Geekbench 5 single core, with a score of 746 against the Intel chip’s 926. But it’s basically tied in multi-core testing, with a score of 2,656 vs. 2,725.

Yea, the Intel processor is a little quicker, but a gap like that isn’t large enough to matter in everyday use. Most modern CPUs are quick enough for web browsing and basic productivity in Microsoft Office (or your Office alternative of choice). Ryzen is no exception.

AMD’s Ryzen 7 3700U even has a bonus; RX Vega 10 graphics. The Vega 10 is a modest integrated graphics solution that can’t handle most modern games, but it more than double’s the performance of Intel UHD 620 graphics (according to 3DMark Fire Strike). That gap does matter.

I’ve already used it to play older games, like Half-Life 2 and Diablo 3, at reasonable framerates. I use a gaming desktop for most my gaming needs, but if the RX Vega 10 can handle a game, I’ll play on my laptop. That wouldn’t be an option with the Intel alternative.

Don’t fret about the battery

Benchmarks eased any performance concerns I had before I purchased my ThinkPad E495, so its effortless speed isn’t a surprise. My worry was battery life. AMD’s processors have a reputation for being less efficient than Intel’s.

Despite that, battery life is fine. I’ve yet to run it dead during everyday use and, in most situations, the laptop loses about 15 percent of its charge per hour. It’ll endure six to seven hours of use.

AMD Ryzen mobile
AMD Ryzen mobile with RX Vega 10 graphics Image used with permission by copyright holder

Now, I know what you’re thinking. Six hours? That doesn’t sound great. Here’s the catch. The budget-minded ThinkPad E495’s battery is small. At 45 watt-hours, it’s 15 percent behind our favorite laptop, the Dell XPS 13. Yet the XPS 13 is smaller and lighter.

No, the E495 won’t last all day. That’s not AMD’s fault. The laptop’s endurance is adequate, and at $600, that’s not a guarantee. You can find better battery life for $600, but only if you’re willing to compromise on performance or screen size.

Why pay more?

I could’ve spent $640 on an Intel-powered ThinkPad E-Series. Instead, I saved $40 and bought the AMD Ryzen variant.

That’s good news if you’re on a budget. There’s no shortage of budget Ryzen laptops available. They’re usually less expensive than Intel alternatives, and they’ll serve you just as well.

Don’t be afraid of the unfamiliar. I have no regrets. I don’t think you will, either.

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
Lenovo’s leaked ThinkBook Flip is a wild take on dual screen laptops
Leaked image of ThinkBook Flip in tent mode. Leaked image of ThinkBook Flip in tent mode.

At CES 2025, Lenovo showed off a laptop with a rollable extending screen. It seems there is more weird laptop innovation still left in the bank at Lenovo. Evan Blass has shared what appear to be product renders of a folding dual-display laptop.

Imagine a book-style foldable phone, and add a keyboard to it. Or maybe, one of those Asus or HP laptops with a flexible folding screen, with a real keyboard deck attached at the bottom.

Read more
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D accounts for nearly all Zen 5 sales
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

Recent sales data from German retailer MindFactory highlights a striking trend in AMD’s Zen 5 CPU lineup, with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D accounting for nearly 90% of all Ryzen 9000-series sales. The latest figures indicate that consumers overwhelmingly prefer this gaming-optimized processor over other models in the lineup.

In January 2025, MindFactory recorded 25,625 total CPU sales, with AMD capturing 92.16% of the market—equivalent to 23,615 units. Intel, by contrast, managed to sell just 2,010 processors, reinforcing AMD’s dominance in the consumer market.

Read more
AMD’s Ryzen Z2 Go disappoints in early benchmark
The Lenovo Legion Go S sitting on a window.

A recent YouTube video has showcased the gaming capabilities of AMD's upcoming Ryzen Z2 Go chipset, designed for budget gaming handhelds. As part of the new Ryzen Z2 lineup, the Z2 Go’s capabilities were tested on a Lenovo Legion Go S and compared to last year’s Z1 Extreme powering the Asus ROG Ally X.

According to gaming performance data shared by FPS VN, the Z2 Go shows some limitations compared to the Z1 Extreme. In Black Myth: Wukong, it achieved 36 fps versus 40 fps at 15W, 30 fps versus 32 fps at 20W, and 60 fps versus 64 fps at 30W. In Cyberpunk 2077, the Z2 Go delivered 50 fps compared to 54 fps at 15W, 45 fps versus 47 fps at 20W, and 61 fps compared to 66 fps at 30W. Similarly, in Ghost of Tsushima, the Z2 Go hits 62 fps versus 66 fps at 15W, 48 fps versus 52 fps at 20W, and 62 fps versus 66 fps at 30W. Although the performance gap is minor, it remains consistent at around 7–10% across all tested games.

Read more