Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Why this two-year-old GPU is still the one you should buy

The AMD RX 6700 XT sitting on a table.
Luke Larsen / Digital Trends

Since Nvidia and AMD announced their next-gen GPUs, budget PC builders have been waiting with bated breath to see what the companies could deliver in the midrange sweet spot of $300 to $400. Unfortunately, the answer hasn’t been pretty.

Nvidia’s RTX 4060 Ti launched to near-universal dissatisfaction, while AMD’s RX 7600, although a decent GPU, carried a lot of caveats. Even Nvidia’s value-focused RTX 4060 failed to impress, largely due to the fact that it’s beaten by last-gen options around the same price.

Recommended Videos

And around all of these GPU launches, there has been one card at the center: AMD’s RX 6700 XT. Launched more than two years ago, it was an impressive GPU that was mostly overlooked due to the fact that it arrived in the midst of a GPU shortage. That’s not to mention the fact it was overpriced to begin with, as AMD (and Nvidia) capitalized on the insatiable demand for GPUs during that time.

RX 6700 XT graphics card installed in computer.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

That dust has settled now, however, and prices have gone down. Without a ton of options in the midrange from Nvidia and AMD, the RX 6700 XT has slowly become the crowning jewel of the $300 to $400 price point, and there are a few key reasons why.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

First, its raw performance. The RX 6700 XT was supposed to trade blows with Nvidia’s RTX 3070. It doesn’t. Nvidia’s GPU is faster. That math changes with how the pricing is for the RX 6700 XT now, though. You can find the card for as low as $320, along with its juiced-up sibling the RX 6750 XT for around $360.

1440p gaming performance for the RTX 4060.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

At that price, the RX 6700 XT looks much more attractive. As you can see above, it’s around the same level as last-gen’s RTX 3060 Ti, beating out the RTX 4060 for around the same price. It’s not quite as fast as the RTX 4060 Ti, but it’s also a lot cheaper.

Now, I don’t want to leave Nvidia out in the cold here. The RTX 3060 Ti has seen some price drops as of late, as well, and you can find it for around $330. Most models run closer to $350, but it’s still a great option at that price. It even has an edge over the RX 6700 XT in some areas. It’s faster with games that support ray tracing and it unlocks Nvidia’s excellent Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS).

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The RX 6700 XT still has some unique advantages, though. Overall, the RTX 3060 Ti and RX 6700 XT are evenly matched, but that includes games with ray tracing. Take ray tracing out of the mix, and AMD’s GPU takes the lead. Take Resident Evil 4 as 1440p as an example. The RX 6700 XT is 11% faster than the RTX 3060 Ti, nearly matching the RTX 4060 Ti.

And in Forza Horizon 5, the RX 6700 XT is not only 20% faster than the RTX 3060 Ti, it even manages to beat the RTX 4060 Ti. This jump isn’t universal across games. In Cyberpunk 2077, for example, the RX 6700 XT and RTX 3060 Ti are evenly matched, while in Returnal and Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the RX 6700 XT is only a few frames ahead.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The RX 6700 XT excels with its raw, rasterized performance now that prices have dropped. If you want ray tracing, however, the RTX 3060 Ti still has an edge, even if that means giving up some performance in other games. In Cyberpunk 2077, for instance, the RX 6700 XT can’t maintain 30 frames per second (fps) while the RTX 3060 Ti pushes near 40 fps, and that’s before turning DLSS on.

There’s another pro in the RX 6700 XT’s camp, though: 12GB of VRAM. We’ve seen more and more over the past year how games are stressing the amount of VRAM on GPUs, and the RX 6700 XT comes out on top in that battle. Resident Evil 4 is a prime example. A big reason why the RX 6700 XT is able to stretch its legs in that title is that it requires a lot of VRAM, allowing it to claim a clear lead over the RTX 3060 Ti.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Similarly, in The Last of Us Part One, the extra VRAM helps the RX 6700 XT claim a 12% lead over the RTX 3060 Ti (along with a massive 22% jump over the RTX 4060 Ti due to that GPU’s constrained memory interface).

Image used with permission by copyright holder

There are a lot of games where VRAM isn’t a concern, and in those titles, the RX 6700 XT matches or slightly exceeds the RTX 3060 Ti without ray tracing. However, we’ve seen enough games that stress VRAM this year alone to call it a legitimate concern. There are half a dozen titles released this year that have run into VRAM problems, and there will likely be more in the future. The RX 6700 XT is better equipped to handle those games than any of the current-gen options from AMD and Nvidia.

I don’t want to leave this saying the RX 6700 XT is the best graphics card for everyone. If you’re looking at the cutting-edge like Cyberpunk 2077‘s path tracing mode, Nvidia still has a massive lead. Unfortunately, in this generation, that usually means sacrificing performance in other games, which is why the RX 6700 XT has become the de facto recommendation for budget-minded gamers, despite the fact that it’s two years old.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
Rest in pieces: Nvidia is finally ditching GeForce Experience for good
The Nvidia app on the Windows desktop.

We've had the Nvidia app for a while, but now, it's available officially. About a year ago, Nvidia launched the Nvidia app into beta as a one-stop-shop for managing some of its best graphics cards, including grabbing new drivers, messing around with different features, and optimizing your game settings. Now, it's out of beta, officially replacing the legacy GeForce Experience and Nvidia Control Panel apps, and with some new features in tow.

One of the biggest draws of the Nvidia app initially was driver downloads. It may seem mundane, but you'd previously need to download GeForce Experience and create an Nvidia account for GPU driver updates. If you didn't, you'd have to search and install your drivers manually. The Nvidia app gives you access to new drivers, and notifies you when they're ready, all without an Nvidia login. Now, signing in is optional for "bundles and rewards" offered by Nvidia.

Read more
5 CPUs you should buy instead of the Core Ultra 9 285K
The Core Ultra 9 285K socketed into a motherboard.

The Core Ultra 9 285K arrived with a thud. It's an interesting, and sometimes very impressive, processor, but it's not necessarily a good one. Stacked up against some of the best processors, the Core Ultra 9 285K struggles in gaming and even falls behind in critical productivity apps, which isn't a great start for Intel's latest generation.

Thankfully, there are some excellent alternatives. I've reviewed just about every CPU that Intel and AMD have released in the past several generations, and I've rounded up five processors that match, and often beat, the Core Ultra 9 285K -- sometimes even for a lower price.
Core i9-14900K

Read more
Why you may want to avoid the latest Nvidia driver release
A screenshot of the Nvidia app.

Nvidia’s latest GeForce 566.03 WHQL driver update was released two days ago, and the company has now acknowledged a peculiar issue. According to a report by Overclock3D, users of Corsair’s iCUE software and Bluestacks, may face “higher than normal CPU usage” and are advised not to update to the latest graphics driver update.

Corsair's iCUE software integrates the company’s compatible hardware into a single interface, enabling users to control RGB lighting, adjust fan speeds, create macros, and monitor system performance. Bluestacks, on the other hand, is an Android emulator for Windows, primarily used for gaming and app development.

Read more