Skip to main content

Apple AirPods vs. Samsung Galaxy Buds+

Apple and Samsung. It’s hard to think of two bigger rivals in the mobile world, and that includes the ever-expanding true wireless earbuds space. In 2019, that battle was between Apple’s second-generation AirPods and Samsung’s Galaxy Buds, which, despite being less popular, were our clear favorites over Apple’s aging Pods (not to be confused with the newer, much pricier AirPods Pro).

In 2020, Samsung released its own second-generation product, the Galaxy Buds+. Do the standard AirPods stand a chance against Samsung’s newest true wireless earbuds? Here’s how the two stack up.


Samsung Galaxy Buds+ hands-on top of table with case
John Velasco / Digital Trends

Apple’s base price for the AirPods is $159. You can sometimes find them for less when they’re on sale, but as with most Apple-branded products, that doesn’t happen often. That price is for the non-wireless-charging version. If you want a wireless charging case, the price jumps to $199.

Samsung’s Galaxy Buds+ start life at $150 — around $20 more expensive than the regular price of the Galaxy Buds. Given that the Buds+ came with a wireless charging case just like their predecessors, they’re the clear leader on price.

Winner: Galaxy Buds+

Sound quality

Image used with permission by copyright holder

We already thought the first Samsung Galaxy Buds sounded better than Apple’s AirPods. Since Apple hasn’t done anything to improve the second-gen AirPods in this regard, it’s hard to imagine that the next Galaxy Buds wouldn’t win this category again.

Adding fuel to this notion is that the Galaxy Buds+ are tuned by AKG and sport dual dynamic drivers, one serving as a tweeter and the other as a woofer. The current Galaxy Buds (and the AirPods) only have single dynamic drivers. In our experience with earbud drivers, two is usually better than one.

In our experiences with the Galaxy Buds+, this was exactly the case. Once again, Samsung’s buds were the clear winner over the standard AirPods, though they didn’t quite have what it takes to square up to the AirPods Pro.

Winner: Galaxy Buds+

Battery life

Samsung Galaxy Buds+ hands-on earbuds on table
John Velasco / Digital Trends

Apple’s AirPods haven’t been the best true wireless earbuds in terms of battery life for quite a long time (if ever), though their 5 hours of playback time once helped set the standard in the genre. However, that’s augmented by a still-impressive 24 hours of total outlet-free time with the charging case. Many other new true wireless earbuds improve on these numbers, and while the Galaxy Buds+ do not, they have made an enormous gain on the first stat.

The earbuds have a claimed 11 hours of playback time before they need a top-off. That number even beats the Powerbeats Pro and Master and Dynamic MW07 Plus, which offer an already impressive 9 hours and 10 hours of playback time, respectively. In addition, they offer a claimed 7.5 hours of total talk time, which again crushes the AirPods, and according to Samsung, can be charged for just 3 minutes for a full hour of playtime when they’re dead.

The Galaxy Buds+ case only holds one full recharge (an odd decision in our opinion), so the AirPods technically still have a slight edge in total playtime. But, for most people, it’s about how long you can go before needing to return the earbuds to their case, and the Galaxy Buds+ win that race by several miles.

Winner: Galaxy Buds+


Samsung Galaxy Buds+ hands-on held in hand
John Velasco / Digital Trends

Despite giving its AirPods Pro IPX4 water resistance, Apple never provided its AirPods with an official water-resistance rating. Not that this has stopped people from taking them to the gym or using them for running, but the point is that Apple’s regular AirPods are much more susceptible to water damage than most earbuds in their class.

Unfortunately, Samsung hasn’t seen fit to increase the IP rating for its Galaxy Buds+, offering only IPX2 splash resistance. Nonetheless, IPX2 is better than no IP rating at all, so guess who wins this round?

Winner: Galaxy Buds+


Samsung Galaxy Buds+ hands-on cases
John Velasco / Digital Trends

Apple’s AirPods pack the Apple H1 wireless chip, which means you can summon Siri hands-free — a convenient feature, especially if your chosen activity makes it hard to reach your ears or your phone. However, where Apple continues to inconvenience its customers is volume control, something you can only do with Siri or your phone.

Samsung’s Galaxy Buds+ won’t let you bark commands without pressing a button, but you will likely be able to change the volume using the earbuds. They also offer wing and eartips for a more customizable fit when working out.

When you add the convenience of wireless charging (for less money than Apple’s non-wireless-charging model), we think the scales tip in favor of the Galaxy Buds+. That is, unless you really love Siri.

Winner: Galaxy Buds+


It’s a clean sweep, and objectively speaking, it’s not that much of a surprise. We thought Samsung’s previous model was the better product overall, and with the improvements the company made for its latest buds, it was almost expected that the Galaxy Buds+ would continue to outshine the AirPods.

From price to sound quality and everything else in between, it’s really not much of a contest at this point. Apple’s AirPods are good, don’t get us wrong. The Samsung Galaxy Buds+ are just better.

Editors' Recommendations

Simon Cohen
Contributing Editor, A/V
Simon Cohen covers a variety of consumer technologies, but has a special interest in audio and video products, like…
Second-generation AirPods Pro have USB-C now, too
Apple AirPods Pro with USB-C.

In one of the least-kept surprises of today's iPhone 15 event, Apple announced that the second-generation AirPods Pro are switching to USB-C for their charging case.

That's a big deal because they'll now use the same charger as the iPad and MacBook — and also because they can use any other USB-C cable that you've got laying around. And because we're not talking about a device with a huge battery capacity, you don't need to worry so much about whether you have the right USB-C cable. Things should charge just fine, and fast enough, given that the battery case only sports a 523 mAh battery.

Read more
Samsung Galaxy Buds deals: As low as $70 today
samsung galaxy buds 2 pro review 12

Wireless earbuds or headphones are one of those things you truly appreciate having around. They allow you to listen to your favorite tunes anywhere, anytime, like during workouts, bike rides, commutes, while studying, and much more. But they can be pricey, so if you're looking at headphone deals for wireless earbuds but you're not impressed with the offers for Apple's AirPods, you may want to check out the discounts involving the Samsung Galaxy Buds. There are several models available for Samsung's wireless earbuds, so to help you figure out what to purchase, we've gathered the top Samsung Galaxy Buds deals that are available right now. We're not sure how long these offers will remain online though, so you better hurry with your decision on which one to buy.
Samsung Galaxy Buds Live -- $70, was $150

The most interesting feature of the Samsung Galaxy Buds Live is its non-traditional design for wireless earbuds -- instead of sitting inside your ear canal with silicon eartips, they rest outside the canal and against the inside of your concha. They will take some getting used to, but once you do, you'll be enjoying wireless earbuds with active noise cancellation, compatibility with both Android and iOS devices, and a battery that can last up to 8 hours on a single charge and a total of up to 29 hours with their charging case, if ANC and the Bixby wake word are turned off.

Read more
Are Apple AirPods waterproof? Everything you need to know
AirPods 3 on an athlete.

So, you just bought yourself a nice new pair of AirPods, or you're thinking about it because they're among the best wireless earbuds you can buy, and you're wondering if they're waterproof. The answer is no, AirPods are not waterproof and you should not wear them while swimming or in the shower or during a water balloon fight. But, if the pair of AirPods you've got (or got your eye on) is either the third-generation AirPods or the first or second-generation AirPods Pro, then you're in luck as they are water resistant.

We're going to get into what all that means and break down how water resistant each AirPods model is and what their water-resistance ratings mean for your daily activities. Let's go.
Water resistant vs. waterproof
As we mentioned above, none of Apple's AirPods -- AirPods, AirPods Pro, or AirPod Max -- are waterproof. But what is "waterproof" anyway? From an electronic device standpoint, being waterproof means that the device is watertight and can be completely submerged in water. There's a common ratings system designed for electronics to measure this (as well as dust and dirt resistance) known as the IP (Ingress Protection) rating, which we cover in our post on the water-resistance rating system.

Read more