Skip to main content

With the AirPods Max, Apple is making a familiar mistake

After months of speculation and rampant rumors, Apple has finally launched its own over-ear headphones in the form of the AirPods Max. The product was just the latest open secret floating around the Cupertino giant’s orbit in a year of leaks and early reveals.

There is no doubt the AirPods Max headphones are interesting, with their premium features and wallet-gouging $549 price tag. Yet I cannot help but feel Apple is repeating a similar mistake — and it has everything to do with that price.

No, it’s not that the AirPods Max are overpriced; there’s a very big difference between “overpriced” and “expensive,” and Apple is hardly slapping an outrageous price on a pair of budget cans. These are powerful headphones, and if you are in the market for something high-end, you will likely love them.

In reality, Apple’s grave mistake is that the $549 version of the AirPods Max is the only version available. If you’re like me, and you feel weird sticking earbuds deep into your ear canal, or if you want something with comfy pads to envelop your lugs, Apple offers you only one choice: Drop over half a grand on the latest and greatest. Nowhere is there a more affordable over-ear alternative, at least not from Tim Cook and friends.

A return to bad old habits

Apple AirPods Max
Apple

If this all feels familiar, well, that’s because it is. Apple made exactly the same mistake when it launched the first HomePod in 2018. Sure, the speaker sounded fantastic, looked smart, and connected to your other Apple kit like magic. But at $349 it was simply too expensive for most people, and even the Apple faithful — who are well used to paying a premium for their gear — balked at the price. Early sales were dismal.

In contrast, rivals like Amazon and Google offered a range of speakers tailor-made for different segments of the market. Amazon had the Echo Studio down to the Echo Dot, while Google’s offerings ranged from the Home Max to the Home Mini. These companies understood that not everyone can afford the most premium product; Apple did not.

Yet here we are, two years later, and Apple apparently hasn’t learned a thing. Why? It comes down to one key factor: mindset. Apple always wants to make the best product in a category, and if that means a thing will be expensive, so be it. Despite the ravings of pundits, Apple does not care one iota about being first — it cares about being the best.

That is great if you want a quality product that will last ages, but it means Apple goes in high and often forgets to offer a more affordable alternative until it’s too late. We saw that with the HomePod, where the company is now desperately playing catch-up to Amazon and Google by releasing the HomePod Mini. And it looks like we could see history repeat itself with the AirPods Max.

It took two years for Apple to realize its HomePod mistake and release a smaller, more affordable version (and hey, it’s not like we weren’t asking for one). Hopefully, it has learned from this experience — and the chastening dominance of its rivals — and has a pared-back version of the AirPods Max in the works. Whatever they are called (AirPods Max Mini? Surely not), they need to arrive soon.

Editors' Recommendations

Alex Blake
In ancient times, people like Alex would have been shunned for their nerdy ways and strange opinions on cheese. Today, he…
When it comes to charging AirPods Pro with USB-C, don’t overthink it
Single AirPods Pro in case.

There's been a bit of a to-do over USB-C and charging rates and data speeds when it comes to the iPhone 15 and its switch away from using Apple's proprietary Lightning cable. The same goes for the AirPods Pro, which also are getting a refresh to USB-C.

While there are some very real considerations to make note of when it comes to USB-C cables and iPhones — faster is (mostly) better when it comes to charging and transferring data — I couldn't care less about either of those things when it comes to my AirPods Pro.

Read more
Apple has upgraded the AirPods Pro with lossless audio, sort of
Apple AirPods Pro with USB-C.

Amid the slew of new Apple products launched today, only the tiniest mention was made of the fact that Apple has also given the AirPods Pro Gen 2 wireless earbuds a not-so-minor refresh. Along with the expected addition of USB-C, making the AirPods Pro the first Apple headphones to ditch the Lightning connector, Apple has also given the iconic white noise-canceling earbuds the ability to do lossless audio wirelessly -- something that has never been seen on the AirPods family before, and is even a rarity among non-Apple wireless audio devices.

There is, however, a catch. The "groundbreaking wireless audio protocol" that allows for lossless audio at 20-bit/48 kHz (a better-than-CD-quality resolution) is powered by the AirPods Pro's H2 chip, but for now, it only works when paired with the upcoming Apple Vision Pro headset. At the moment, Qualcomm's aptX Lossless Bluetooth codec (when used with compatible wireless headphones and smartphones) is the only technology that supports lossless audio wirelessly, and even that technology is limited to 16-bit/48kHz.

Read more
Second-generation AirPods Pro have USB-C now, too
Apple AirPods Pro with USB-C.

In one of the least-kept surprises of today's iPhone 15 event, Apple announced that the second-generation AirPods Pro are switching to USB-C for their charging case.

That's a big deal because they'll now use the same charger as the iPad and MacBook — and also because they can use any other USB-C cable that you've got laying around. And because we're not talking about a device with a huge battery capacity, you don't need to worry so much about whether you have the right USB-C cable. Things should charge just fine, and fast enough, given that the battery case only sports a 523 mAh battery.

Read more