Skip to main content

With the AirPods Max, Apple is making a familiar mistake

After months of speculation and rampant rumors, Apple has finally launched its own over-ear headphones in the form of the AirPods Max. The product was just the latest open secret floating around the Cupertino giant’s orbit in a year of leaks and early reveals.

There is no doubt the AirPods Max headphones are interesting, with their premium features and wallet-gouging $549 price tag. Yet I cannot help but feel Apple is repeating a similar mistake — and it has everything to do with that price.

No, it’s not that the AirPods Max are overpriced; there’s a very big difference between “overpriced” and “expensive,” and Apple is hardly slapping an outrageous price on a pair of budget cans. These are powerful headphones, and if you are in the market for something high-end, you will likely love them.

In reality, Apple’s grave mistake is that the $549 version of the AirPods Max is the only version available. If you’re like me, and you feel weird sticking earbuds deep into your ear canal, or if you want something with comfy pads to envelop your lugs, Apple offers you only one choice: Drop over half a grand on the latest and greatest. Nowhere is there a more affordable over-ear alternative, at least not from Tim Cook and friends.

A return to bad old habits

Apple AirPods Max

If this all feels familiar, well, that’s because it is. Apple made exactly the same mistake when it launched the first HomePod in 2018. Sure, the speaker sounded fantastic, looked smart, and connected to your other Apple kit like magic. But at $349 it was simply too expensive for most people, and even the Apple faithful — who are well used to paying a premium for their gear — balked at the price. Early sales were dismal.

In contrast, rivals like Amazon and Google offered a range of speakers tailor-made for different segments of the market. Amazon had the Echo Studio down to the Echo Dot, while Google’s offerings ranged from the Home Max to the Home Mini. These companies understood that not everyone can afford the most premium product; Apple did not.

Yet here we are, two years later, and Apple apparently hasn’t learned a thing. Why? It comes down to one key factor: mindset. Apple always wants to make the best product in a category, and if that means a thing will be expensive, so be it. Despite the ravings of pundits, Apple does not care one iota about being first — it cares about being the best.

That is great if you want a quality product that will last ages, but it means Apple goes in high and often forgets to offer a more affordable alternative until it’s too late. We saw that with the HomePod, where the company is now desperately playing catch-up to Amazon and Google by releasing the HomePod Mini. And it looks like we could see history repeat itself with the AirPods Max.

It took two years for Apple to realize its HomePod mistake and release a smaller, more affordable version (and hey, it’s not like we weren’t asking for one). Hopefully, it has learned from this experience — and the chastening dominance of its rivals — and has a pared-back version of the AirPods Max in the works. Whatever they are called (AirPods Max Mini? Surely not), they need to arrive soon.

Editors' Recommendations

Alex Blake
In ancient times, people like Alex would have been shunned for their nerdy ways and strange opinions on cheese. Today, he…
Amazon’s new $50 Echo Buds take aim at Apple’s AirPods
Amazon's new Echo Buds for 2023.

Amazon is back with a new set of Echo Buds. Though they bear the same name as the first- and second-gen Echo Buds, these new Echo Buds offer an entirely different, semi-in-ear, stem-based design that has more in common with Apple's second-gen AirPods than it does with Amazon's previous designs. The latest Echo Buds are also surprisingly affordable at just $50.

While the decision to keep the name the same may be confusing, the decision to create a set of wireless earbuds with a semi-in-ear shape makes a lot of sense. Fully in-ear buds like the second-gen Echo Buds, the AirPods Pro, and Sony's WF-1000XM4, provide distinct advantages for sound quality and they also set the stage for active noise canceling (ANC). However, lots of people find these earbuds uncomfortable to wear. The silicone tips increase the sensation of having an object wedged in your ear, and some folks complain of a sucking feeling, especially when ANC is turned on.

Read more
This touchscreen AirPods case is the worst thing I’ve seen all week
Apple AirPods Pro 2 sitting beside iPhone 14 and charging case.

If you know me even the slightest bit, you’ll know that I’m a big Apple fan. I have an iPad, Apple Watch, and multiple Macs. And even though I’ve been diving into the world of Android phones, my primary device is still an iPhone 14 Pro. I also always have my AirPods Pro 2 with me, whether that’s at home or when I’m out at Disney parks — they're always on me in some way or another.

But as much as I like Apple, there are certainly some things that will make me scratch my head and go “Huh?” The latest one is what appears to be a new patent held by Apple that could lead to an AirPods case with an integrated interactive touchscreen.
The patent does what now?

Read more
AirPods Pro 2 may finally offer this charging feature
Apple AirPods Pro 2 inside their charging case.

Continuing with its move toward USB-C, Apple looks set to incorporate the connector into the charging case for its AirPods Pro earbuds, according to respected Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo.

The second generation of Apple's top-of-the-line earbuds, which the tech giant released in September last year, features a Lightning charging case. But Kuo, who has called it right in the past when it comes to Apple’s plans, said in a recent tweet that Apple is “likely” to start selling a USB-C charging case with Apple’s premium buds, adding that it could start shipping as early as the second quarter of this year.

Read more