Skip to main content

Are we OK with a $799 Galaxy S21 being made of plastic?

 

The Samsung Galaxy S21 series is finally here, and at first glance, it looks as though Samsung is finally taking lower-cost flagship phones seriously. But dive into the specs a little, and you can see that Samsung has cut some corners (or at least, not advanced things) to hit that $800 price. Like with a 1,080p display, and, unfortunately, by including a plastic — or dare we say, “glasstic” — back on the Galaxy S21.

This isn’t the first time we’ve seen a plastic back on a high-end Samsung phone. Samsung used plastic on the Galaxy Note 20 (not the Ultra) and Galaxy S20 FE, which managed to be good enough to be accepted by the masses despite drawing ire from smartphone nerds.

Glasstic is pretty nice

Now, I’m not a glasstic-hater. In my review of the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, I actually found it to be pretty nice. Sure, it’s not as premium-feeling as glass, but the soft-touch plastic is comfortable to hold, not to mention the fact that it’s more durable.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

And that’s perhaps the most important advantage to the plastic back: Durability. Most of us have experienced the pain of dropping a phone only to pick it up shattered, and while you can definitely still scratch plastic, it just doesn’t break as often, or in the same way, as glass does. No matter how strong Corning’s latest Victus glass may be, it’s still going to crack if you drop it from the right angle or height. Many get around this with a case, but with a plastic phone, you may not need one.

Still, there’s no denying it — glass looks nicer, feels nicer, and is getting stronger every year.

It’s more about the message

Whether Samsung’s glasstic is more durable or feels as nice as actual glass on a phone is kind of irrelevant. It’s more about the message Samsung is sending by not including premium materials on a phone with the Galaxy S name. And by simply not saying a thing about the materials in its new phones — lest it draw attention to the fact that they’re not created equal.

I get it. Samsung wants to widen the gap between its most premium phone, the Galaxy S21 Ultra, and its slightly cheaper phones, which are of course still very expensive. But it’s doing so in the wrong way. Spending extra on the S21+ or S21 Ultra should be down to getting added, bonus features, or a larger size — not a decision made based on getting a phone that feels as good as the brand suggests.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

When you spend $800 on a phone, you should get a device that feels expensive. That feels weighty and cool to the touch. You should get a device that feels different from phones that cost a fraction of the price.

Apple has mastered this. Yes, the iPhone 12 Pro’s matte glass feels awesome, and that’s something you can’t get on the standard iPhone 12. But that standard iPhone 12 still has a premium, glass build. It found other places to cut to save money. To the layperson, it still looks like the latest-and-greatest iPhone, even in the case of those only spending $700 for the iPhone 12 Mini.

We’ll have to wait and see if this is a trend that Samsung intends to continue with future models. For now, however, if you buy a Galaxy S21, you’re going to have to be okay with a plastic back.

Christian de Looper
Christian de Looper is a long-time freelance writer who has covered every facet of the consumer tech and electric vehicle…
Every Samsung Galaxy S25 owner should buy this wireless charging case
The The back of the Galaxy S25 Ultra Magnetic Charging Cover attached to the phone and the box

Samsung’s new Galaxy S25 series brings a few improvements, especially for the flagship Galaxy S25 Ultra. While the new ultrawide camera, improved build, and thinner body may be the ones that stand out the most, one particular feature could offer the best quality of life improvements.

The Galaxy S25 Ultra comes equipped with the same 45W charging speeds as its predecessors, although overall charging speeds have been improved by around 3-4% over last year’s Galaxy S24 Ultra. Alongside this, however, Samsung has also equipped the Galaxy S25 Ultra with compatibility for the Qi2.1 wireless charging standard, making it the first smartphone to support the next generation of wireless charging.

Read more
Samsung’s Galaxy S25 Edge shows what the Galaxy S25 series should have been
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge cameras

Samsung fans can finally rejoice as we have something truly different with the Galaxy S25 series. No, it’s not the Galaxy S25, Galaxy S25 Plus, or the Galaxy S25 Ultra, but rather, the new Galaxy S25 Edge. Yes, Samsung has revived its Edge branding, and in many ways, it follows the essence of the Galaxy S6 Edge and Galaxy S7 Edge of years ago.

After the credits rolled at Samsung Unpacked last week — and as some people made their way to the exits — the company pulled off an interesting one more thing. It wasn’t a teaser like the Galaxy Ring last year, but rather it was an announcement — of sorts, at least — of the new Galaxy S25 Edge.

Read more
There’s a clear winner in our Galaxy S25 Ultra vs iPhone 16 Pro Max camera test
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max's cameras.

Would it be right if we didn't put the latest Samsung Galaxy S series against the latest iPhone in a camera test? We don’t think so, which is why we’ve been out taking photos with the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max to see which one has the best camera.
Camera specification
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (left) and Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The Galaxy S25 Ultra’s camera has the same 200-megapixel main camera, 50MP telephoto for 5x optical zoom, and 10MP telephoto for 3x optical zoom as the Galaxy S24 Ultra. What’s new, outside of the processor and software driving it, is a new 50MP wide-angle camera. Samsung has collaborated with Qualcomm on a special Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy processor and uses plenty of AI in the camera for improved results.

Read more