Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Wearables
  3. Opinion
  4. Features

Dear smartwatch makers, what the hell is wrong with you?

Add as a preferred source on Google

New York Times restaurant reviewer Pete Wells famously savaged Guy Fieri with some pointed questions after a disastrous visit to his American Kitchen & Bar in Times Square in 2012. After a year spent sampling the latest smartwatches, we have a few questions for the folks cooking them up as well:

Who said we all wanted smartwatches?

Who noticed that today’s young adults generally don’t wear watches and thought, hey, let’s fix that? Or maybe someone saw the popularity and success of Fitbit and thought: I bet we can complicate that?

Do you still think there is a market for a $17,000 product that’s absolutely guaranteed to be outdated next year?

Who looked at a shape clearly too small to type on and thought, hey, let’s put a keyboard in there? Which product manager decided the steady stream of notifications clogging our smartphones wasn’t sufficient? Can we find him, and strangle him?

Dear smartwatch makers: Did you run extensive usability studies to determine what consumers want, then rake the results into a pile and set them ablaze? Or did you pluck your decision to build from some unfortunate slice of humanity — the myopic, self-loathing few who enjoy peering at their wrists to learn tidbits of information that then prompt them to reach for their smartphones?

And here’s a thought: Have you worn your own devices? Have you strapped them to your wrists, plugged them in to charge overnight, and explained to your friends why it takes a $350 gadget slightly longer to tell the time than with a $20 Casio? Do you feel even a tinge of embarrassment when confronted with this reality?

Did your engineers explain how squeezing tiny batteries into even tinier spaces would equate to tiny performance and even tinier battery life? Was that sufficient to shake your confidence in the plan for even a moment? When your designers were given those power demands and battery limitations, did they just throw up their hands and walk away? Is that why we have things like this?

Are you aware that many experts think the wrist isn’t really the best place to detect the biometric data you’re trying to sell your products on? Have you considered the ear, for example, or the upper arm? Or the navel? Have you gazed at that, recently?

Have you even read Dick Tracy?

When you read reports that the smartwatch enthusiasts at Samsung were delaying the release of their next smartwatch, did you stare with wide eyes, realizing that maybe, just maybe, they were doing that for a reason? Or did it look like an opportunity to double down, to really mark your scent on the territory? (And who am I, the customer in that metaphor? Do you think I used it for a reason?)

And hey, Apple: Did you think you could improve things? Scratch that: Do you think you did improve things? Did you notice that the scroll wheel on your Watch zooms into apps, without letting me zip back out? Does any other scroll wheel you’ve ever used work like that? Having the ability to check my heart rate anywhere and anytime is great; did it occur to you to extrapolate useful information from that data? Or did you think to yourself, hey, let’s save that option for version two?

Apple Watch Faces
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Speaking of which, when you unveiled a new version of the Watch interface, did you expect us to be bowled over by new watch faces? Is that what you think we’re looking for from one of the greatest consumer technology companies of the 21st century? Really?

And do you still think there is a market for a $17,000 product that’s absolutely guaranteed to be outdated next year? One that isn’t, say, a car?

Have you heard the chorus of people loudly abandoning their precious Watches?

Do you see where I’m going here?

With the sincerest apologies to Pete Wells, the New York Times, and Guy Fieri.

Jeremy Kaplan
As Editor in Chief, Jeremy Kaplan transformed Digital Trends from a niche publisher into one of the fastest growing…
Nothing’s first proper smartwatch could be the wrist candy Android needs
Nothing wants to put some personality back on your wrist
Wristwatch, Arm, Body Part

Just like how smartphones have settled into a familiar routine, smartwatches have also become quite predictable. But Nothing might be planning on shaking things up for wearables. A tipster claims the company is preparing its first smartwatch under the main Nothing brand. The unnamed wearable will reportedly launch in September, cost less than $300 in the US, and initially reach a limited number of markets.

Its design is also said to carry the “typical Nothing DNA” that has helped the company’s phones and audio gear stand apart. Right after this, Nothing co-founder Akis Evangelidis joined the conversation with a separate, cryptic post. It adds some company-side smoke to the leak, although Nothing has yet to announce the watch or reveal any hardware details formally.

Read more
Google could soon let you unlock your Pixel Watch with your phone
An in-development feature could flip the current Watch Unlock feature, letting an authenticated phone unlock the watch automatically.
Google Pixel Watch 4 in black in the hand

If you've set up a PIN on your Pixel Watch, you already know the prompt that shows up every time you slip it back on your wrist. It's a useful security measure, but entering a PIN on that small screen multiple times a day gets old fast. A new report suggests Google may be working on a way to let you skip it.

Watch Unlock in reverse

Read more
A new iPhone app can sniff out Meta smart glasses lurking nearby
Your iPhone can now keep an eye on the glasses keeping an eye on you
The Ray-Ban Meta smartglasses and case.

Android users got an unusual privacy tool earlier this year that could alert them when smart glasses were nearby. Five months later, iPhone owners finally have something similar, and its name makes its feelings about Meta pretty obvious.

AntiZuck is a $2.99 iPhone app that scans for Bluetooth signals associated with smart glasses and alerts you when it thinks one is close. It supports devices including Meta Ray-Bans, Snap Spectacles, Amazon Echo Frames, and RayNeo glasses, while the developer says additional hardware is being added.

Read more