Skip to main content

I don’t need Starfield because I have The Outer Worlds

Starfield will be one of the biggest games of 2023, but I’m not that excited to play it yet.

While  Starfield’s spotlight at the Xbox & Bethesda Games Showcase this year highlighted some impressive features, I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’d already gotten everything I’d want from a traditional sci-fi RPG like this from another game: The Outer Worlds from Obsidian Entertainment. Ironically developed by another Microsoft-owned studio, The Outer Worlds showed that bloating up a sci-fi game with thousands of planets isn’t necessary when a “less is more” mentality can still result in an expertly designed sci-fi RPG. 

Although The Outer Worlds might not be as nearly as grand as Starfield in scope, it still leaves an impression every time I revisit it. It’s a focused, replayable, and hilarious adventure without much bloat, which is what I want from my RPGs. It does this while emulating Bethesda’s classic The Elder Scrolls and Fallout games too, beating Starfield to the punch.

Starfield could impress me when it launches, but what I’ve seen of it hasn’t got me that eager to play it when I’m so content with replaying The Outer Worlds while avidly waiting for its sequel.

Starfield: Official Gameplay Reveal

Fewer worlds, more fun

From the moment your escape pod accidentally lands on a bounty hunter that’s supposed to help you, it’s clear that The Outer Worlds is a tongue-in-cheek, satirical take on capitalism, colonization, and the sci-fi genre as a whole. While Bethesda Game Studios’ narratives have their fair share of humor, much of its writing tends to be more serious and dryly written. We haven’t seen enough of Starfield’s dialogue or narrative to get a sense of its thematic identity yet.

Starfield’s narrative could be more playful than we’ve seen so far, but the game’s massive scope is what really worries me. During the Microsoft showcase, Todd Howard boasted that there are over 1,000 planets to explore. Because Starfield is so huge, I worry that it risks feeling unfocused. Will I get bored on planets that aren’t very handcrafted and don’t have as much to do? It’s the same potential issue that infamously plagued No Man’s Sky at launch.

Meanwhile, The Outer Worlds and its upcoming sequel are intentionally designed to avoid those bloat issues, according to former Obsidian Entertainment Narrative Designer Nitai Poddar in a 2019 Game Informer interview. “There is a lot of value in having an open-ended game that is still structured around individual discreet levels,” he said. “It also tends to be easier to develop, and I’m always a fan of making the most of a budget that you have.”

Obsidian Entertainment

The Outer Worlds’ developers didn’t have a huge budget, and kept the game small but very tightly designed as a result. You might not be able to explore entire planets or fly between them, but you’ll definitely remember what you did on every single one you visited. This smaller scope allowed the studio to make the world more reactive to each dialogue choice and player decision.

Playing a combat-focused build in The Outer Worlds gives you an entirely different experience than a dialogue-driven playthrough. You can also murder or scorn everyone you meet in The Outer Worlds, and the game accounts for it in tangible, narrative ways. This makes The Outer Worlds a great sci-fi roleplaying experience, and I’m hopeful its sequel will be too. I’m not as hungry for a sci-fi RPG on such a potentially problematic large scale anymore when The Outer Worlds and its handcrafted worlds and narratives are so enjoyable moment-to-moment, just like classic Bethesda games. 

Where both games will boldly go

As far as sci-fi experiences go, Starfield can stand out from The Outer Worlds with its combat, base-building and shipbuilding, and space combat. But when it comes to the core tenets of Bethesda’s best RPGs — compelling characters, well-written narratives, and lots of reactive and choice-driven moments — The Outer Worlds beat Starfield to the punch without any additional fat. I already have the Bethesda-like sci-fi experience I always wanted.

A space explorer stands in front of a mountain range in Starfield.
Bethesda

Thankfully, this isn’t a competition between studios or an either-or scenario for all Xbox management and players. Both Starfield and The Outer Worlds can coexist as successful franchises in Microsoft’s wider gaming lineup. Starfield has several feature differences that will make it stick out more to diehard Bethesda fans and those more interesting in flying around in space or building a base on a planet. I’m happy that Microsoft is willing to put out two similar sci-fi RPGs because it knows they’re both distinctive enough to stand on their own, even if I end up preferring one over the other.

Still, almost every red flag I see in Starfield is something that The Outer Worlds so expertly avoided. I’ll certainly go into Starfield with an open mind when it launches, and I hope I’m surprised and thoroughly enjoy the experience. If it doesn’t fully grip me, I won’t lose sleep over it; I’ll just go back and do another playthrough of The Outer Worlds.

Starfield will release for PC and Xbox Series X/S during the first half of 2023. The Outer Worlds 2 has no release date, but the original and its expansions are available on PC, PS4, PS5, Xbox One and Xbox Series X via Xbox Game Pass, and Nintendo Switch.

Editors' Recommendations

Tomas Franzese
Gaming Staff Writer
Tomas Franzese is a Staff Writer at Digital Trends, where he reports on and reviews the latest releases and exciting…
Starfield’s most impressive feature misses what makes Skyrim so memorable
An astronaut stands on the moon in Starfield.

Though Bethesda Game Studio is a celebrated developer, there are some fair critiques that one could raise against most of its games. Combat isn't always a high point, main questlines can feel lacking, and bugs can unarguably ruin the entire experience. However, if there is one thing that most people could agree on, it's that the team creates some of the most compelling digital worlds out there that are rewarding to explore. From the burned-out capital in Fallout 3 to the snowy mountains and deep forests of The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, Bethesda has proven a reliable studio in providing unique worlds players love getting lost in.

Starfield had the potential to do that multiple times over with the limitless potential of space exploration. With over a 1,000 planets to explore, it seemed like there would be plenty of room for Bethesda to do what it does best at scale. Despite that, Starfield at times feels like the most linear game the company has made in decades -- an unexpected side effect of a key change to how traversal works.
The final frontier
I'm not going to sit here and claim that I, or anyone else, actually walked across all of Skyrim or any Fallout location. Fast travel is a necessity in these games if you want to finish them within your lifetime. However, you did have to do the work of getting to all the landmarks yourself first before you could skip the hike.

Read more
Starfield’s file size is massive no matter what platform you’re playing on
A spacecraft in Starfield.

The file sizes for Starfield finally appeared across some of the storefronts it's available on now that it's available to preload. As a result, we've learned just how massive the game is.
On Steam, Bethesda recommends that players have 125 GB of space for the game, but Microsoft's own launcher shows an even bigger PC install size of 139.84 GB for Starfield. That size is only slightly smaller on the console, with the Xbox Store showing me that the game will take up 117.07 GB on my Xbox Series X. It's now very understandable why Microsoft is launching a 1 TB version of the Xbox Series S around Starfield; still, the game will even take over a tenth of that system's memory if players aren't expanding it at all. 
This 110+ GB file size across all platforms for Starfield demonstrates just how big Bethesda's upcoming sci-fi RPG will be. It also follows a recent trend of even single-player taking up gigantic chunks of your game system's memory. This year alone, we've seen Star Wars Jedi: Survivor take up over 130 GB of space on consoles, while Baldur's Gate 3 clocks in at 125.14 GB currently. As games get bigger with more detail, it's clear that our gaming platforms will be able to accommodate fewer and fewer games on their SSDs going forward. 
At least you can play the game via Xbox Cloud Gaming if none of your platforms can accommodate that file size. Starfield will be released for PC and Xbox Series X/S on September 6. Those who pre-order the Premium Edition will get access on September 1, though.  

Read more
With Redfall’s stumbles, the pressure is on for Starfield
A character levitates a book in Redfall.

Judging by reviews and early impressions, Redfall is a resounding disappointment for Xbox and Bethesda. Hyped as Xbox’s first AAA release in over a year and one of the most significant things to come from Xbox’s 2021 acquisition of ZeniMax Media, Redfall isn't quite living up to those lofty expectations. While I'm still working through the game myself, I’ve played enough to know that this open-world vampire shooter pales in comparison to Arkane’s previous titles and its co-op shooter peers.

Coming after one of Xbox’s roughest years ever in terms of exclusives and the failure of the Activision Blizzard acquisition, it’s not a good look. It puts an excessive amount of pressure on just one game in Xbox’s lineup: Starfield.

Read more