Skip to main content

Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5: Who will ‘win’ the next console war?

While the whole concept of “console wars” is woefully outdated, the launch of every new generation of video game systems inevitably turns into a debate over who’s ‘winning’. And with Microsoft and Sony having shown the majority of their hands about what to expect this holiday season (with two notable data point exceptions), the back and forth is already underway.

Those exceptions — price and launch date — are not insignificant ones. But, in general, the information people need to decide if they want an Xbox Series X or PlayStation 5 is already available.

This battle between Microsoft and Sony, though, could be notably different than anything we’ve seen before. Game consoles are already seeing significant competition from the prevalence (and low cost) of quality mobile games. New platform challenges are on the horizon. And that could make this console generation the most interesting — and competitive — in decades.

What’s not known

Not knowing when the PS5 and Xbox Series X will launch nor how much they will cost isn’t something to shrug off entirely, but the lack of specifics on that data isn’t quite as big a black hole as it might appear.

Date? Microsoft, last week, confirmed a November launch when talking with Bloomberg — and historically has opted for November 15 or 22. The PS3 and PS4 came out on November 17 and November 15, respectively — and there’s no reason to think Sony will vary much from that formula.

Price, admittedly, is a bigger wildcard. If one system is $100 cheaper than the other, that could impact initial demand. But that’s unlikely. Both manufacturers have been burned by launching systems at significantly higher prices than their competitors in the past.

The biggest unanswered question, ultimately, might be supply. New consoles are always scarce at launch — in part because of higher production costs and in part because consumers lining up outside stores to get their hands on one is a great photo op, in non-pandemic times.

We’re in a pandemic, though. So launch events for new consoles likely (and hopefully) won’t be the circus they have been with previous launches. And while Microsoft and Sony are both projecting confidence about their system launches, we don’t have a firm grasp on whether the global economic shutdown had a notable effect on the number of systems they were able to produce. That could impact some of the early sales numbers.

What’s known

The technical specs of both the Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5 have been out in the wild for a long time. Both are relying on SSD hard drives and boast faster processors. Sony has touted the audio prowess of the PS5 as well, something that’s been de-emphasized of late, perhaps because that’s hard to showcase without in-person demos.

Tech specs don’t sell systems, though, unless the games utilize them with aplomb. And, so far, Sony has done a better job of showcasing titles that take advantage of the next generation’s features. While both Microsoft and Sony promised games running in 4K at 60 fps, Sony took things a step further in its June presentation, with the demo for Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart, as Ratchet jumped between dimensions in milliseconds, a subtle way to showcase just how fast new levels can load on the PS5. It was fast and furious gameplay the likes of which has never been seen before. And it could give Sony an advantage among players looking for new experiences.

Short game versus long game

Judging by the initial social media reactions to the unveiling events, Sony has done a better job of capturing the gaming world’s immediate attention. That’s not entirely surprising, given the PS4’s popularity. There was bound to be some spillover from those fans.

So, it’s not unreasonable to assume the PS5 will get more early adulation than the Xbox Series X (although that doesn’t mean you’re going to see people turning up their noses at Microsoft’s system — both will sell out for months). And Sony, perhaps, will once again take an early unit sales lead.

But here’s where things get interesting.

Microsoft is doing a couple of things different this generation. First, it’s putting a much bigger emphasis on Xbox Game Pass, an all-you-can-play flat fee service that lets people get their hands on the latest first-party AAA games, as well as an extensive back catalog, for a low annual fee. That’s a business model that has worked incredibly well in other industries — and could appeal to gamers who chafe at paying $70 per game.

It’s also one that could lure in a lot of casual gamers and fence-sitters. Yes, quality games are what sell consoles, but significant price advantages are a big lure as well.

The company is also bundling Game Pass with its xCloud game streaming service for no additional cost. That’s going to allow people to get familiar with game streaming and try the service out without feeling like they’re having it thrust upon them. And that could set Microsoft up for a long-term victory.

Game streaming is widely considered the industry’s next big thing by publishers, developers, and other industry insiders, despite the rocky start of Google’s Stadia. And Microsoft is much better positioned to handle the technical demands of streaming than Sony. Pairing it with a Netflix-like model and including new first-party releases only makes it more palatable.

Every new console generation is an exciting time. But this series could top anything we’ve seen before. It’s a multi-tiered battle that will ultimately take place on several fronts. And any time console companies are especially ferocious about turning heads, it works out very well for the players.

Editors' Recommendations

Chris Morris
Chris Morris has covered consumer technology and the video game industry since 1996, offering analysis of news and trends and…
Dreams live support is ending — and that’s a big misstep for PlayStation
Art fights a giant bird in Dreams.

Sony could’ve had its own popular proprietary game engine and metaverse. Instead, it just let it slip through its fingers.

Media Molecule is ending live support for Dreams, its highly ambitious game-creating and playing tool for PS4, on September 1. Its servers are staying online for now -- and it has a few more content updates in the pipeline before then -- but after August, there will be no new tools, ports, or events for Dreams. That means it’s not coming to PS5, PlayStation VR2, and, most critically, PC.

Read more
The Lord of the Rings: Gollum is unintentionally delightful
lord of the rings gollum art

One does not simply walk into Mordor; instead, one might opt to climb up a wall of vines or jump from platform to platform. That’s the crux of what The Lord of the Rings: Gollum is all about.

The game positions the player as the classic Lord of the Rings villain, shining light on his previously unexplored backstory, which includes his capture and subsequent escape from the clutches of evil. It’s a novel concept that I wasn’t exactly sure would work before trying it out for myself. Given all that, I knew I needed to play The Lord of the Rings: Gollum at PAX East, and after going hands-on with it, I came away with mixed thoughts that lean positive, with more than a few caveats.

Read more
The Finals is the shake-up the competitive first-person shooter scene needs
A player stands up against a wall in a The Finals screenshot.

While I enjoy playing first-person shooters occasionally, it's a genre I've struggled to become a hardcore fan of. To me, it has stagnated, with recent Call of Duty and Battlefield games feeling like little more than rehashes of the same quick-kill-focused gameplay on maps that all blend together after a while. That's why The Finals' longer time-to-kill, unique match objectives, and focus on level destruction all feel like a breath of fresh air.
THE FINALS Closed Beta Trailer
Developed by Embark Studios, the new multiplayer shooter is a notable change of pace for a stagnating genre. Because it takes a lot of effort to defeat an opponent, and the map is continuously changing as you do so, no two matches feel quite the same. I can attest to that, as I recently went hands-on with it and had that exact experience. Lots of thrilling, emergent moments organically happened during each match, leading to some of the most memorable matches I've had playing a first-person shooter in years.
If you've always enjoyed destructible environments in your FPS games and enjoy inventive competitive shooters that aren't just trying to chase what is popular, then you'll want to check out The Finals.
Map mayhem
The Finals' primary mode, Extraction, is framed as a game show where four teams compete to earn the most money during a match. Players do this by locating vaults on a map, obtaining cash boxes, and delivering them to a cash-out station. Extra money is rewarded for kills and a team's total is halved if they are completely wiped. The basics of the FPS gameplay are approachable enough for anyone who has played a game in this genre before. That said, its longer time-to-kill also helps that mission and gives players time to appreciate just how reactive its world is.
In the Closed Beta preview build, I played on two maps based on Monaco and Seoul. Each contains points of interest connected by some indoor arenas and long outdoor corridors that you'd come to expect from an FPS map. But it only stays that way for a short time. As soon as explosives get involved, the map transforms as buildings crumble and the environment reacts to the players. It stays that way too, as developer Embark Studios' server-side technology tracks and accommodates any changes to the map.
Last year, the developers at Embark Studios told Digital Trends that they hope this technology would make other developers panic. While we don't think The Finals will go that far, it certainly handles destruction better than other games that have tried to boast similar strengths, like Crackdown 3 or Battlefield 2042. It's not only a neat technical feat, but it also opens up many organic situations you don't get in other FPS games.

For example, a building was crumbling as I retrieved a cash box and headed to a cash-out station. I was under fire, and an opponent's rocket completely destroyed the pathway to get me to the building my teammates were in. I knew I didn't want the team chasing me to get ahold of the cash box, so I sacrificed myself by throwing the vault across that gap to my teammate before proceeding to hold enemies off as they delivered it to a station.
Even the greenery reacts to the player, especially when they have a flamethrower or flame grenade. At one moment, the station my team was delivering to was out in the open in a park. Other teams were coming at us from all angles, so I threw several fire grenades, and my teammate used a flamethrower. Doing this, we set most of the park aflame, forcing our opponents into pathways where we could pick them off more easily. Floors can crumble beneath you, staircases that get you to objectives can be destroyed, and a lot of map mayhem helps define each match of The Finals.
Leaving your mark
The Finals' destruction creates some compelling dynamics, making the player feel like they are shaping the world that each match takes place in. Players can customize their characters with outfits and special loadouts ahead of matches, and some of these options allow them to set down jump pads and ziplines or use a grappling hook to improve mobility. Turrets, barriers, and mines are also equippable, which can be used to direct the flow of battle and herd opponents into certain sections of the map. One particularly memorable moment saw my team calling two elevators in Seoul, only to find that another team had put a turret in one and all of themselves in another.

Read more