Skip to main content

The Sandman wars, or how accurate are sleep trackers?

In 2018, the CDC classified sleep disorders as a public health epidemic.

A lot of people suffer from insomnia or other issues that make sleeping difficult for them. Just as many people simply don’t get enough sleep each night and find themselves tired throughout the day. To tell the truth, I’m one of them — I know I don’t get enough sleep, and I’ve been working to change that.

Related Videos

Part of that process involved a deep dive into sleep trackers. For several weeks now, I’ve used the Nest Hub’s Sleep Sensing feature, worn a Garmin Epix almost every hour of every day, and used an iPhone app to track my sleep patterns. I wanted to see how accurate each device was, as well as which device was the most feasible.

The 2nd Gen Nest Hub on a bedside table.
John Velasco / Digital Trends

This experiment came on the heels of a study on how sleep tracking actually worked, in which I spoke with several experts.

The setup

The tests consisted of three devices:

  • Garmin Epix smartwatch
  • Nest Hub 2nd Gen
  • SleepWatch iPhone app

I also tried to employ a smart bed in the process, but the one I used did not have sleep tracking (and the previous smart bed I had no longer functions without leaking thanks to my cat).

Both the Garmin Epix and the Nest Hub automatically track sleep with zero input on my end. Nest’s Sleep Sensing uses Motion Sense and tracks the presence of a person in front of the display, activating when someone is in the correct position.

The Garmin Epix monitors changes in breathing and heart rate to determine when you transition into sleep.

The Garmin Epix on a man's wrist.

The iPhone app, on the other hand, requires manual activation. I have to tell it when I’m laying down to sleep, and then I have to disable it when I wake up. While this does require more manual input, it’s also a good indicator of when I lay down and when I get up, but not the amount of time actually spent in one of the four sleep stages.

The results

Day Garmin Epix Nest Hub SleepWatch
May 1 5h 38m 2h 20m 4h 25m
May 2 7h 33m 5h 19m 5h 50m
May 3 7h 9m 5h 32m No data
May 4 5h 24m 1h 38m 6h 20m
May 5 5h 4m 2h 14m 6h

From the outset, there’s a disparity in the results — particularly with the Nest Hub. It’s for one simple reason: the device is tethered to the bed. Both the app and the Garmin Epix travel with me if I wake up and move to another room, but the Nest Hub does not.

That said, I remained in bed all night on May 4, yet there is still a huge gap in the time I supposedly slept. I’m not sure why that happened, except that I might have moved my cup of water in front of the sensor without thinking.

If you get out of bed during the night, it can skew the Nest Hub’s results.

Of all of these results, I suspect the Garmin Epix is the most accurate. Garmin has a feature called the “Body Battery” that calculates your relative energy levels at any given time based on how well you slept and how much you exerted yourself during the day. I found it to be accurate most of the time; when I felt more energized, the battery showed a high score. When I was tired at the end of the day, the battery was also low.

The practical considerations

The reasons the Nest Hub is so far off from the rest of the results isn’t because it’s faulty. It’s because the Nest Hub uses Soli radar to measure miniscule movements of your breathing, your heart rate, and more. If you aren’t in front of the sensor, it doesn’t record.

As someone struggling with insomnia, I often get out of bed if I can’t sleep. Few things are as frustrating as laying in a dark room with nothing to do — boredom becomes the enemy. I’ll typically get up and watch TV or read in the living room until I fall back asleep on the couch.

The Nest Hub system beside a bed.

The Garmin Epix and the SleepWatch app both move with me, but the Nest Hub does not. In my particular use case, they’re the better options. However, the average person who spends most of the night in bed (where sleep is the highest quality) will see much better and more accurate results from the Nest Hub.


A valuable trait of the Garmin Epix and the Nest Hub is that both suggest solutions to poor-quality sleep. The Garmin Epix tracks a number of other vital measurements including stress. If you go to bed with a high-stress level, it can interfere with your sleep. The Epix will suggest that you try to de-stress and unwind before bed, or it might suggest an earlier bedtime if you went to bed too late.

The Nest Hub is not as detailed, but it compares your sleep quality against previous instances and will tell you whether you slept for more or less time, and whether you were restless or not.

So which device was most effective? That’s hard to say. For me, a wearable is the best fit for the reasons stated above — but it’s often better to get multiple data points and compare them. If you are serious about tracking your sleep, use a wearable device and a smart bed. If you have a Nest Hub capable of Sleep Sensing, take advantage of it.

Over time, you’ll gain a better understanding of how long it takes you to fall asleep and your usual sleep cycles. Bear in mind that none of this data is clinical; no home device compares to the level of accuracy found, for example, in sleep study facilities. However, it’s also important to understand that sleep is an inexact science. Think of tracking your sleep a bit like horseshoes: Pretty much on target is sufficient.

Editors' Recommendations

How loud is too loud for your smart devices?
An Amazon Echo in living room.

When people purchase smart speakers like a Google Nest or an Amazon Echo, one of their common concerns is if the audio is loud enough to fill a room. Can it power a party? Can you hear it over kitchen cooking sounds?

Now we want to ask similar questions from another angle: Can today’s powerful smart and Bluetooth speakers get too loud? What risks does playing audio and top levels involve? Is it always okay to crank the volume when you feel like some extra bass? Let’s get down to the details.
Smart speakers and hearing damage

Read more
Are we becoming too dependent on the smart home?
Amazon Echo Show 15 hanging horizontally on the wall in a kitchen.

Over the weekend, my wife and I took a trip a few states over to visit a friend. That first night at the hotel, I found myself asking Alexa to turn off the lights. It actually took a moment to realize I needed to turn the lights off without a smart assistant.

Now that might be an isolated incident, but it illustrates my point. When we use smart homes on a daily basis, the idea of actually reaching for a switch to turn off the lights seems absolutely archaic. It's a backup feature, nothing more. But taken further, does this indicate an almost unhealthy dependency on the convenience and features of the smart home?

Read more
There’s no new Nest Hub, but that’s OK
Hosting a Zoom conference through Nest Hub Max.

Google held its I/O 2022 event yesterday, but one much-rumored device was noticeably absent: The Nest Hub. Rumors had originally stated that there would be a Nest Hub with a detachable front screen that would work as a sort of "smart tablet." These were based off leaks that most likely pointed to the newly announced Pixel Tablet, releasing sometime in 2023.  While there is some disappointment among Nest fans, it's not the right time for an update for several reasons.
The 2nd Gen Nest Hub released last year
The 2nd Gen Nest Hub released on March 30, 2021. That means it's been just over a year since new hardware entered the market. The previous iteration of the Nest Hub released three years before that, and even with those three years to develop for it, the hardware didn't change that much. The biggest changes were sleep-sensing capabilities and better audio quality. While a detachable screen could work as a sort of portable tablet, there's not much use for it -- not realistically. Anything a portable smart tablet could do can also be done on your phone, and probably faster.

The one hardware upgrade I can see Google pushing for is a significantly larger screen -- perhaps something to compete with the Echo Show 15. Right now, Alexa has cornered the market on smart displays. The Echo Show 15 is massive and feels like a true smart device, while the Echo Show 10 caters to those who use Amazon's communications features. Both of those devices have a specific purpose, but the Nest Hub has always felt vaguely like an afterthought.
Software is the next frontier
The only smart-home related announcement at Google I/O 2022 focused on new feature updates for the Nest Hub Max (not even the standard Nest Hub.) These updates relied on the Nest Hub Max's built-in camera to recognize when you're looking directly at the device, eliminating the need to say "Hey Google" repeatedly. This is a key feature that makes it more convenient to use; after all, wake words can sometimes be irritating. While watching the event, my own Nest devices triggered several times from the audio cues.

Read more