Skip to main content

Diablo 4 should resurrect the series’ most controversial feature

In 2012, Blizzard fired up one of its many future controversies: It wasn’t the decision to simply revive the Diablo franchise that did this, but the fact that it chose to monetize the legendary hack ‘n’ slash RPG with Diablo 3. Beyond trading items with another player, an in-game auction house meant players could buy and sell items with real money.

For some, it was a bewildering decision from a developer already battling the threat of real-money trading (RMT) in its monolithic MMORPG World of Warcraft. The idea of claiming a cut of player’s profits was seen as simple corporate greed stemming from the then-recent merger with Activision, a company known for pushing aggressive revenue streams onto consumers.

Within two years, uproar caused the feature to be ripped from the game, with a “smarter” loot system put into place to reduce the need to rely on other players for equipment. But a lot has changed since 2012, and with Diablo IV in the works, it’s time for the auction house to make a return.

The Diablo 3 Auction House interface
Image used with permission by copyright holder

A real grind

In any Diablo game, each character class relies on different equipment types, armor sets, and stats to thrive. All of these are randomly generated after slaying a monster. If an item drops and its random stat rolls aren’t perfect for your ideal build, it’s back to the grind you go. Statistically, the grind for perfect loot could go on forever. If you have the time, there’s no harm in chasing the dream. If you don’t, the game feels like a chore.

The Diablo III auction house was a faster alternative to that chase, though it was regarded as a black market by players. It just felt shady. The idea of paying real money for any in-game item rubbed players the wrong way at the time, despite the fact that the game didn’t feature the kind of “pay-to-win” mechanics that plague multiplayer games.

Those complaints feel misguided in retrospect. These days, one of the biggest complaints in gaming is when a title doesn’t respect our time. When a powerful or must-have item is locked behind menial tasks that are drawn out over weeks, sometimes months, in a bid to artificially inflate the game and have it look like a bigger value investment than it really is.

Even before the auction house, trading to get ahead was nothing new for the franchise. In its heyday, Diablo II was rife with gameplay automation software and “gold farmers” enticing players with rare items and in-game gold at a relatively low cost. As anyone who frequents an online RPG can attest, scrubbing a game of sketchy third-party services is impossible. It’s pure supply and demand. If people weren’t clearly willing to pay, the market wouldn’t exist, meaning we only have ourselves to blame for its existence — similar to the scalping situation currently driving up the prices of computer components and next-gen consoles.

Activision Blizzard

On its surface, the Diablo III auction house looked like nothing more than a way for Blizzard to extract extra cash from its already paying customers. In actuality, it was a way to legitimize and moderate the in-game market, giving anyone the means to reap the rewards of continued play or circumvent the hours of farming needed to chase gear.

It’s an approach the company later adopted in a similar form in World of Warcraft with the WoW Token. Players could buy one for real cash and sell it to another player for in-game gold to cover their membership fees. They couldn’t make money from it, but they could save some. And because it was Blizzard-approved practice of RMT, it was allowed to live and thrive, with its in-game price dictated by supply and demand.

So why shouldn’t Diablo IV reintroduce the auction house? The allure of lady luck one day sending that perfect piece of loot flying out of the bloodied corpse of a goat man is what keeps Diablo players hooked. It’s what the whole looter genre is built to support. But the needs of one player won’t always match the free time of another. If you have a whole day to freely grind for items, why shouldn’t you be able to offload any gear you don’t need to a player who might not have the time to blindly grind for a specific item that has no guarantee of appearing? We expect to get paid for the hours we work, so why are we so averse to the idea of generating a little something for the time we put into a particular activity?

Diablo III gear
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Win-win situation

Loot in Diablo is infinite. Someone finding what you need doesn’t mean it’s suddenly locked behind a paywall. You can still luck out and find your own. But if you’d rather not take the chance of losing dozens of hours to the gamble of the grind, why not tip someone else for their time spent? After all, there’s a chance they didn’t find what they were after, either. If their struggle can save you time and your money can ease the pain of their misfortune, it’s a win-win situation for players on either side of the hunt.

With so many forms of entertainment vying for our time, player choice matters most, and reintroducing the auction house to Diablo IV can help facilitate the ever-changing needs of the modern gamer. Where once we could pay a stranger to spend their time “boosting” our character, now we simply pay the publisher to change a number in a database. So why do we draw the line at paying someone else for their time spent farming items? People are willing to pay for things like a Double EXP boost to save time, so why villainize those who want to buy a piece of gear someone else just so happened to find before you? The focus of Diablo should be on playing with an item, not playing to acquire it.

Editors' Recommendations

Josh Brown
Josh Brown is a UK-based freelancer with devoted interests in video games, tech, film, and anime/manga. Just don't talk to…
I tried playing Diablo Immortal on PC, and it was a mistake
Diablo Immortal on a PC monitor.

Diablo Immortal, Blizzard's new mobile-first action RPG, is abysmal on PC. The game launched in open beta at the beginning of June for PC and mobile, and I downloaded the PC version to see what all the fuss (and discourse) was about. But I couldn't stomach the experience for very long.

Although there are hundreds of fantastic mobile games, I prefer to do my gaming at a desk on my PC. Diablo Immortal had a big opportunity to win over the core PC fan base that infamously trashed the game, but the busted PC port shows that Blizzard's effort was half-hearted at best.
Built for mobile

Read more
Diablo Immortal launches in June, and it’s coming to PC
Team battling a character in Diablo Immortal.

Diablo Immortal, which spawned the infamous "Do you guys not have phones?" moment, has been a contentious game for years due to its focus on mobile. Now, it seems that Blizzard is looking to turn that around, as today it announced that Diablo Immortal will not only launch on Android and iOS on June 2, but on PC in open beta as well.

Diablo Immortal is an online-only, free-to-play massively multiplayer online RPG set between the events of Diablo 2 and 3. The title originally was revealed in 2018 for mobile platforms only, much to the disappointment of longtime series fans. It seems that Blizzard took notes from the mass reaction and decided to bring Immortal to PC. The PC version will feature crossplay with the mobile version.

Read more
Activision Blizzard plans mobile Warcraft, next Call of Duty
Warcraft 3 Reforged main character holds a hammer and stares at the camera.

Activision Blizzard plans to release a new Call of Duty game and mobile Warcraft game in 2022, according to a February 2022 financial results report.
As part of that report, the company went over what investors could expect from Activision, Blizzard, and King in 2022. Notably, a Warcraft game for mobile phones is officially teased for the first time: "Blizzard is planning substantial new content for the Warcraft franchise in 2022, including new experiences in World of Warcraft and Hearthstone, and getting all-new mobile Warcraft content into players’ hands for the first time."
We've yet to learn the title of this game or see it in action. It'll be the first Warcraft game released since the disappointing Warcraft 3: Reforged in 2020, and the second to hit iOS and Android, following Hearthstone. 
In the same report, Activision discussed Call of Duty in great detail. While the teased Call of Duty game is still untitled, this financial results report and a tweet from Infinity Ward heavily suggest that it's Modern Warfare 2. "Development on this year’s premium and Warzone experiences is being led by Activision’s renowned Infinity Ward studio," the results state. "The team is working on the most ambitious plan in franchise history, with industry-leading innovation and a broadly appealing franchise setting." Shortly afterward, Infinity Ward tweeted, "A new generation of Call of Duty is coming soon. Stay frosty."
"Stay frosty" is an iconic line of John "Soap" MacTavish, a classic Modern Warfare character that was only teased in the 2019 reboot. Considering that 2019's Call of Duty: Modern Warfare is widely regarded as the series' best game in recent memory, it's not a surprise that the Modern Warfare 2 rumors are true. A report from Bloomberg claims that this game will still release on PlayStation consoles, which makes sense as the Microsoft acquisition isn't expected to be complete until June 30, 2022.
Despite the acquisition being in progress, developers fighting to unionize, and the delay of Overwatch 2 and Diablo IV, this financial results report confirms that we can still expect new games from Activision Blizzard in 2022.

Read more