Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Mobile
  3. Reviews

Google Nexus S Review

Stewart Wolpin
By
Google Nexus S
Google Nexus S
Score Details
DT Recommended Product
“Google’s Nexus S represents cell phone schizophrenia. It's ahead of its time in some ways, behind the times in others.”
Pros
  • Large 4-inch WVGA (480 x 800) Super AMOLED screen
  • Faster Android v2.3 Gingerbread OS
  • 1GHz Cortez A8 Hummingbird processor
  • Long battery life
  • 16GB memory built-in
Cons
  • Screen has greenish tint
  • Poor camera, VGA camcorder
  • No microSD slot
  • No pre-installed video chat software
  • No social network account syncing

For its next-generation Nexus phone, the unlocked Nexus S made by Samsung (but usually sold with a T-Mobile subsidy for $199.99), Google has produced what can be best described as an advanced basic smartphone. It features some bleeding-edge technologies such as a 4-inch AMOLED screen, Android 2.3 Gingerbread, NFC tag reading, a front-facing camera, and both tethering and mobile hotspot capabilities. These advanced features are undercut, however, by its lack of soon-to-be-standard features for smartphones of its ilk, such as high-definition video recording, HSPA+ 4G to fuel its mobile hotspot, and no pre-installed video chatting app. It makes a fine introduction to Android, but is unlikely to appeal to more advanced users moving to their second or third smartphones.

Features and design

If the Nexus S looks vaguely familiar – that’s because it’s a slightly redesigned version of Samsung’s Galaxy S phone for T-Mobile, the Vibrant. The Nexus S is molded with slightly rounder corners, lacks Vibrant’s silver perimeter band, and moves the microUSB and the headphone jack from the top to the bottom of the phone. They both have a distinctive rear bump on the bottom, and a 4-inch Super AMOLED (active matrix organic light emitting diode) screen. This one is brighter and more colorful, although it does tend toward the greener part of the spectrum. Otherwise, physically, they’re the same phone.

Inside, while both sport a 1GHz processor, the Nexus S runs Google’s latest and fastest Android OS, v2.3 Gingerbread, while Vibrant runs 2.2 Froyo. Both phones include a 5-megapixel camera, but the Nexus S includes an LED flash. The Vibrant includes 720p high-definition recording, while the Nexus S mysteriously records only 720 x 480.

Related

The phone’s singular breakthrough is the inclusion of NFC, near field communication. Wave the Nexus S over an NFC tag, such as an RFID (radio frequency identification) code, from an inch or two away to initiate or perform all manner of functions. NFC can be used as electronic money, sort of like a Blink credit card. An NFC-endowed phone can be used as a ticket, a hotel room key, or for information exchange between devices. It can be used to quickly pair a Bluetooth headset. It can link you to a Web site or activate a function or download.

In other words, there are lots of potential NFC usages, and one day all cellphones will be so endowed. But right now, there are few NFC tags to be read anywhere in the U.S. (Google has initiated a pilot program in Portland, OR). By the time NFC tags become ubiquitous, the Nexus S will be an ancient smartphone.

Similarly undercut is the Nexus S’ front-facing VGA camera, by the lack of QIK or other video-chatting software preinstalled. While there is 16GB of memory built in, like the iPhone, the Nexus S lacks a microSD slot for additional memory.

Multimedia capabilities

With its bright, crystalline Super AMOLED screen, the Nexus S makes a wonderful video viewer. YouTube videos load automatically in full screen at high quality. Out only quibble is the screen’s slight green-or-yellowish discoloration, sort of like the tint you see on old displays. Fortunately, it isn’t nearly as bad as the gray sheen that seems to overlay all images on Vibrant.

Google supplements output from the earpiece with a small but loud speaker on the rear. It’s got a tiny guard over the grille, which means music still sounds loud with only a hint of muffling when the phone is placed on its back.

Sound quality

The Nexus S provides plenty of volume, but voices sounded muted and muffled at both ends of cell-to-cell calls, a little less on calls to and from land lines. The excellent rear speaker provides just as much volume for voice as it does for music, lying face up or face-down.

Phone functionality

The Nexus S is faster in every respect – app downloading, booting, website loading, media up- and downloading – than nearly every other 3G Android phone with which we’ve played, although far outshined in data speed by T-Mobile’s 4G phones.

But even though it runs a slightly newer OS and has fun animations on its home page and other gadgets, in many ways the Vibrant is a more finished OS. Settings icons are monochrome on the Nexus S, for instance, color on the Vibrant. On Vibrant you can add contact, photo and social networking accounts syncing for Facebook, Twitter, Flickr and other, but not on Nexus S, which means no Facebook photos to flesh out your Nexus S contact list. These aren’t major drawbacks, merely surprising given Nexus’ supposedly superior OS.

What the Nexus S does vastly improve upon is the touch QWERTY keyboard, which now includes the oft-used @ symbol on the main alpha display, and a cleaner horizontal number row, rather than the dial pad-like 4-by-3 arrangement on the Vibrant.

The Nexus S provides one other tiny yet important convenience – the backlit function buttons beneath the screen (Back, Menu, Search, Home) remain lit as long as the display also is lit. On the Vibrant and other Galaxy S models, these controls go blank in a couple of seconds, leaving you to guess where they are once they go blank.

Web and connectivity

As noted, the Nexus S is generally much faster than Froyo 2.2 Android models. Web-optimized pages such as CNN, The New York Times, ESPN and Wikipedia load two to three seconds faster than on the Vibrant. Oddly, however, non-optimized pages such as The New York Daily News loaded a few seconds faster on the Vibrant than on the Nexus S.

However, the Nexus S often provided at least one bar of additional signal strength compared to the Vibrant, which on a few occasions slipped into EDGE while the Nexus S held one to two bars of 3G.

Camera

With all its advanced features, it’s somewhat shocking that Google imbued the Nexus with only a 720 x 480 video recorder, rather than the high-def recorder found in nearly every other new smartphone.

As with most cellphone cameras, the Nexus S shoots acceptable 5-megapixel photos outdoors, but even with a flash, indoor results are poor. Overall colors are flat, focus is lost away from the center of the image, and the flash often overwhelms the subject, leaving a bleached image.

Battery Life

Gingerbread’s primary improvement over Froyo is battery life. The Nexus S’ bright display draws nearly a third less power, cell standby mode uses around 10 percent less, and idle draws around 20 percent less, all of which results in far greater overall life. After two days of on-and-off usage, the Vibrant was down to around 20 percent remaining power, while the Nexus S retained nearly half its battery life.

Conclusion

Google’s Nexus S represents cell phone schizophrenia. It’s ahead of its time in some ways, behind the times in others. But these musings are moot; with the floodgates of 4G opening, the Nexus S is about to be drowned in phones with perhaps fewer bleeding-edge technologies, but touting strong 4G capabilities.

Highs:

  • Large 4-inch WVGA (480 x 800) Super AMOLED screen
  • Faster Android v2.3 Gingerbread OS
  • 1GHz Cortez A8 Hummingbird processor
  • Long battery life
  • 16GB memory built-in

Lows:

  • Screen has greenish tint
  • Poor camera, VGA camcorder
  • No microSD slot
  • No pre-installed video chat software
  • No social network account syncing

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
What is 5G? Speeds, coverage, comparisons, and more
The 5G UW icon on the Samsung Galaxy S23.

It's been years in the making, but 5G — the next big chapter in wireless technology — is finally approaching the mainstream. While we haven't yet reached the point where it's available everywhere, nearly all of the best smartphones are 5G-capable these days, and you're far more likely to see a 5G icon lit up on your phone than not.

There's more to 5G than just a fancy new number, though. The technology has been considerably more complicated for carriers to roll out since it covers a much wider range of frequencies than older 4G/LTE technology, with different trade-offs for each. It's also a much farther-reaching wireless technology, promising the kind of global connectivity that was once merely a dream found in futuristic sci-fi novels.

Read more
You may want to think twice about buying a Samsung or Pixel phone
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra next to the Google Pixel 7 Pro.

A new report from Project Zero, Google's internal security research team, says that a laundry list of devices using Exynos modems are at a high risk of major security breaches that would give remote users the ability to very easily "compromise a phone at the baseband level." Notably, the recently released Pixel 7 is among those that are open to attack, alongside the Pixel 6 and Samsung Galaxy S22, to name just a few.

Obviously, this is a major issue, but not all hope is lost, as the problem is certainly fixable. The big question is when a fix for all affected devices is coming. Here's everything you need to know about the vulnerability and what you can do to keep your smartphone safe.
Why Samsung and Pixel phones are in danger

Read more
The Google Pixel Fold may not be as expensive as you thought
Alleged renders of the Google Pixel Fold in black.

Google’s long-in-development foldable phone — the Pixel Fold — is reportedly eyeing a late June launch. A recent leak predicted that the Pixel Fold will hit the European shelves priced at 1,700 Euros, which equates to roughly $1,800 based on current conversion rates. That’s not easy to digest, especially for a first-gen foldable phone and considering Google’s own shaky history with its Pixel hardware and software.
But it appears that the Pixel Fold’s price won’t be inexplicably exorbitant at all. Leaker Yogesh Bear shared on Twitter that the foldable phone could actually cost anywhere between $1,300 and $1,500. Assuming that turns out to be true, the Pixel Fold could undercut the Samsung Galaxy Fold 4 and its successor by a healthy $500.

In fact, such an asking price would put the Pixel Fold in roughly the same ballpark as the higher storage configurations of phones like the Galaxy S23 Ultra and Apple’s iPhone 14 Pro Max. Of course, Google won’t be able to match the asking price of foldables from Chinese brands, but it would at least look competitive in the Western markets.
Now, a price of around $1,300-1,500 makes a lot of sense. First, the biggest deterrent for foldable phones is their high asking price. There’s a reason Samsung managed to sell bucketloads of its flip-style foldable phones because they cost nearly half vis-a-vis the phone-tablet hybrids in the Galaxy Z Fold series.

Read more