Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Motorola Moto E (2020) review: Great value at $150

motorola moto e 2020 review 5
Motorola Moto E (2020) review: Great value at $150
MSRP $150.00
“The Motorola Moto E isn't perfect, but for $150, it's your best option.”
  • Relatively modern design
  • Good performance for the price
  • Clean software experience
  • Camera could be better
  • Display isn't great

Motorola has long been a go-to company for budget phones. The Moto E was first launched in 2014, and quickly became a fan favorite for those who want a decent phone for around $150. Six years later, the company is continuing the tradition with a new Moto E model that boasts a relatively modern design, midrange specs, and more.

While the Moto E has remained a great option over the years, plenty of competition has popped up. Does the new Moto E still compete with the best phones under $200?

Design and display

Edge-to-edge displays have made their way to some of the cheapest phones out there — and the Moto E is jumping aboard that train. The device has a small chin at the bottom and a teardrop notch at the top, but it still looks great for a phone in this price range.

The display sits in at 6.2 inches, and the bezels around it are relatively slim. That’s good news — it means that the phone looks modern despite its price range.

The back of the phone looks good too. The phone is made largely from plastic, and while it doesn’t feel as premium as more expensive devices, it doesn’t feel overly cheap either. On the back of the phone, you’ll get a fingerprint sensor under the Motorola logo and a vertically aligned camera array.

Around the edges of the phone, you’ll get a pretty standard setup, including a volume rocker and power button on the right, as well as a SIM/MicroSD card slot, also on the right. There’s also a headphone jack on the top, which is good news for those who still use wired headphones.

On the bottom, you’ll get a Micro-USB port, which is a little frustrating to see. The Moto E may be a budget phone, but it’s 2020, and USB-C should be the standard on all phones by now.

The display on the Moto E is pretty much what you would expect from a $150 phone in 2020. It has a 720p resolution, and it’s an LCD display, so don’t expect much. It also seems to be slightly different than the display on the new Moto G Fast, as it can’t get quite as bright. If you’re outside and in direct sunlight, you may have some issues being able to see the display clearly.

Performance and battery life

Under the hood, the Moto E offers a Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 processor coupled with 2GB of RAM. I found that while it’s not necessarily able to handle heavy multitasking or intense mobile gaming, it definitely does the job for most day-to-day use, and certainly outperforms a lot of the competition in this price range.

Generally speaking, most users will be more than happy with the performance of this device. If you’re switching between more than a few apps at a time, you may have to deal with slowdowns and skips in the software, but those usually resolved themselves quickly, and the device was still more than usable. The same is true for Chrome tabs — basic web browsing is perfectly fine, but anything heavier and you’ll want to consider a more powerful phone.

Basic mobile gaming is also doable on this phone, but don’t expect much more than the basics. Call of Duty: Mobile was playable, though it wasn’t the smoothest experience out there. The Moto G Fast, or if possible, the Moto G Power, will perform better.

If you’re really serious about mobile gaming, you’re going to want a phone with at least a Snapdragon 7xx-series SoC, or an iPhone. Budget phones are outmatched. This isn’t necessarily a problem unique to the Moto E, but rather a compromise all budget phones make to reach a lower price point.

Benchmarks confirm decent performance for the price. The phone scored 118,004 on AnTuTu, which isn’t bad. For comparison, last year’s Moto G7 Play scored 98,111, while the higher-performing Google Pixel 3a scored 157,902. The Moto G Fast, which is $50 more expensive, hit 161,672.

The battery capacity on the phone comes in at 3,550mAh, and we found that in day-to-day use, it performed fine. The battery should get you through a day of normal use, but heavy users may find that they have to charge the device before the end of the day. Don’t expect it to get too far into the next day. The phone does not offer wireless charging, nor does it have fast charging, so you’ll need to get into the routine of charging it at night, or if you work at a desk, when you’re working.


The 2020 Moto E offers a dual-sensor camera, though one of those sensors is a 2-megapixel lens only used to capture depth information. The other sensor is a 13-megapixel lens with an f/2.0 aperture and, generally speaking, it’s fine. But only fine.

In well-lit environments, the Moto E is able to capture decent photos, with solid color reproduction and depth of field.  While photos weren’t incredibly detailed, that won’t be such a big deal for most uses.

Of course, you won’t always be in well-lit environments. When you’re not, you’re more or less out of luck. While more expensive phones are capturing better and better low-light photos, there’s no night mode to speak of on this phone — as a result, badly lit photos either look noisy, or you can’t see the subject at all.

Around the front, there’s a 5-megapixel selfie camera, and it does the job in a pinch. Like the rear-facing camera, it doesn’t perform in low light, and it’s definitely susceptible to unnaturally bright colors in some situations. Still, it’s usable for most social media posts.

The Moto E is a budget phone, and it has a budget camera. It’ll do the job in most situations, but don’t expect incredible photos, and don’t expect to be able to use it in low light.


The software experience on modern Motorola phones is great. With the Moto G Fast and Moto E, the company has rebranded its Android skin as My UX. Apart from a name change, not much else is different — you’ll still get the nea- stock experience with only a few minor tweaks that honestly make the experience even better.

Perhaps the best thing about My UX compared to stock Android are the Moto Actions, which allow you to control certain aspects of the phone’s software with gestures. For example, you can take a screenshot with the tap of three fingers, or you can turn the flashlight on with a chopping motion. It’s a nice touch.

My UX is built on Android 10, and Motorola has been pretty good about delivering software updates. That said, considering this is a budget phone, it may not get updates as quickly as you might want. The Moto G7, for example, didn’t receive Android 10 until May 2020.

Price, warranty, and availability

The Moto E is available straight from the Motorola website for $150, which is a great price for this phone. If you can stretch your budget a little, it’s worth considering the Moto G Fast, or if you can stretch even more, the Moto G Power.

The Moto E comes with a one-year limited warranty, but that warranty really only covers manufacturer defects. It’s worth buying a case to protect the device

Our take

The Motorola Moto E is far from perfect, but for $150, it’s best option. It offers a relatively modern design, solid performance, and more, and if you’re buying on a budget, performance is one of the most important things to consider.

Is there a better alternative?

If you’re willing to spend more money, then there are definitely better options. The $200 Moto G Fast is a solid phone, with better performance and much better battery life. If you can double your budget to $300, the Samsung Galaxy A51 or the Google Pixel 3a are worth considering. The Google Pixel 3a in particular is an excellent phone with an incredible camera.

How long will it last?

Under light use, the Moto E should last around two years. The phone’s performance will degrade over time, so don’t expect to have a smooth experience for that entire two-year period. Also, the phone has no water-resistance, so don’t take it near the bath or the pool.

Should you buy one?

Yes, if you need a phone for $150 or less. If you can stretch your budget a little, it’s worth spending the extra cash.

Editors' Recommendations

Moto G 5G hands-on review: Good phone, better battery
A person holding a Moto G 5G smartphone up to their ear

Motorola is a mixed bag when it comes to smartphones, and the Moto G 5G marks a really interesting moment in the company’s tenure. If you’re looking for flashy flagships, the modern Motorola Razr brings folding touchscreens to the party while the Moto Edge+ boasts high-end materials and tons of bells and whistles. The Moto G 5G doesn’t really have a seat at that table.

Available starting now at most major retailers for $400, the Moto G 5G sits more firmly on the low end of the mid-tier space. And that can be a dangerous place for a smartphone to be. Budget phones in the $200 price range have obvious trade-offs that most budget smartphone buyers can live with. But for twice that price, how many corners can be cut?

Read more
Motorola G Stylus 5G hands-on review: Notetaking nirvana on a budget
The Motorola G Stylus 5G with a stylus and plants.

My first thought upon seeing the Moto G Stylus 5G was how much it reminded me of the Motorola Edge+, which I recently reviewed. Fresh out of the box, the two are nearly identical in appearance. However, the G Stylus has some extra tricks up its sleeve, one of which is the fact that it has a built-in stylus that invites comparisons to Samsung’s S22 Ultra. The other is a very affordable price tag. The question is, can such a low-cost smartphone offer an experience that compares to such flagship devices?
Design and display: Looks great, feels cheap
As mentioned, the G Stylus looks an awful lot like the Edge+, and that’s a good thing. It’s a beautiful design that manages to negate some of the inconvenience of the camera bump. Unfortunately, the G Stylus doesn’t have that premium feel to it like the Edge+, and the backplate is a real fingerprint magnet. However, if you’re like me, a phone comes out of the box and goes immediately into a protective case, so lower quality backplate materials are a good place to reduce production costs.

The tall, 6.8-inch screen looks great, its FHD+ resolution is good enough, and colors/contrast are fine by my eye. Best of all is its 120Hz refresh rate, which allows for fluid navigation. Touchscreen functionality is responsive, and haptic feedback is similarly decent. Bezels are fairly large and noticeable, but not offensively so.

Read more
Super thin and light Moto Edge 30 has dual 50MP cameras
Motorola Edge 30 being put into a pocket.

Motorola’s new Moto Edge 30 has two 50-megapixel cameras on the back and a sizable 6.5-inch screen, but it’s all wrapped up in a super slim, very lightweight body for a modern, high fashion look. How slim and light are we talking? The Moto Edge 30 is only 6.79mm thick and 155 grams. For comparison, the iPhone 13 Pro is 7.65mm thick and 204 grams, and the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a whopping 8.9mm thick and 229 grams.

The dual 50MP camera array has the same basic capabilities as the more expensive Moto Edge 30 Pro phone and is joined by a 2MP depth sensor too. Features include optical image stabilization (OIS), the ability to shoot HDR10 video, take macro photos down to a 2.5cm distance, and selfies with the front 32MP camera.

Read more