Skip to main content

Intel’s instability update cuts speed by up to 6.5% — but don’t panic yet

Intel Core i5-14600K processor inside its socket.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Intel has finally gotten a grip on its disastrous instability problems that have been the bane of some of Intel’s best processors for nearly a year, including the Core i9-13900K and Core i9-14900K. The update was released last week, and users are now taking it out for a spin. And unfortunately, some are reporting performance drops of up to 6.5%.

A user on the Chiphell forums tested the new BIOS patch that is supposed to address instability on Intel’s 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs. The user twfox saw a drop of around 6.5% with the Core i9-13900K in Cinebench R15’s single-core test, at least compared against Wccftech’s own tests. In the more recent Cinebench R23, the Core i9-14900K dropped about 2% of its multi-core score, falling behind AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X.

Recommended Videos

Those aren’t the severe performance drops we saw when Intel first tried to address this issue. In the first round of motherboard updates, users saw drops of anywhere from 9% up to 20%, and in multiple applications. Here, the performance differences are minor, and they shouldn’t impact gaming performance at all. Even so, Intel’s original post announcing the BIOS update said that the performance differences should be “within run-to-run variation,” including in tests like Cinebench.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Although the performance loss shouldn’t be meaningful in the vast majority of applications, it’s interesting to see where the Core i9-13900K and Core i9-14900K have ended up now that the dust has settled on Intel’s instability fiasco. It also raises a lot of questions as both Intel and AMD move on to new generations of processors.

AMD has already released its Zen 5 CPUs, including the Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X. However, they were met with a lukewarm reception, prompting AMD to update the power specifications of the lower-end Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 5 9600X.

On Intel’s side, the company is gearing up to launch its 15th-gen Arrow Lake processors, which are expected to arrive before the end of October. With new Intel chips on the way, and performance-changing updates for both Zen 5 and Intel’s last two generations, it’ll be important to pay close attention to performance numbers in the next round of CPU reviews.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
Intel is finally stepping up on its instability fiasco
Intel Core i5-13600K installed in a motherboard.

Last week, Intel quietly committed to extending the warranty on its 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs, but it wouldn't provide details at the time. Now, we know what processors are covered. Intel is extending the warranty on a large range of 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs by two years, giving customers a total of five years to file a warranty claim.

From a performance standpoint, Intel's latest 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs are among the best processors you can buy, but the chips have been in hot water as of late. A string of instability issues, and a lack of communication from Intel, have eroded trust not only in the CPUs, but also Intel as a brand. The warranty extension is an attempt by Intel to help restore that trust, as the narrative around Intel's instability troubles has only become more intense as time goes on.

Read more
Intel might get slapped with a class-action lawsuit
Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

The calls for a class-action lawsuit in response to Intel's instability issues with 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs are turning into action. The law firm of Abington Cole + Ellery has launched an investigation into a potential class-action lawsuit against Intel, and it has a form on its website for users to submit details if they believe they're an affected party.

The law firm hasn't provided any details on what the class action might entail, but the form asks customers if they've purchased an affected processor or a PC containing one of the affected processors, as well as if they've experienced issues. About a day after posting, the form is currently sitting on top of the r/Intel subreddit, right above a megathread where Intel users can report if they've experienced any instability issues. A user claiming to be a class-action lawyer asked if Intel is honoring return requests, and most responses claim the company is.

Read more
I grilled Intel about its massive stability problem — here’s what it told me
intel instability unanswered questions dt respec

Intel is in trouble. We've known there was a problem for months, but the true scope of the issue is coming into focus. Intel has finally said a microcode update that will solve the instability problem is on the way, but it won't be here for several weeks. It's not much of a resolution, either -- I still have a lot of questions about Intel's instability problem, and how it plans to address the issue going forward.

I've sent the list of questions below to Intel for a response, and in cases where Intel has responded, I'll provide the exact quote. We've definitely seen some shifty communication from Intel regarding the instability issue up to this point, so I'll fill in the gaps if there's anywhere Intel wasn't able to provide a solid answer.
How will this impact performance?

Read more