Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

If you think you know what to expect from Atomic Heart, think again

After playing the first three hours of Atomic Heart, I felt like I had a pretty good handle on what to expect. The upcoming first-person shooter felt like a clear spiritual cousin to Bioshock Infinite, trading in the 1922 skies of Columbia for an alternate history vision of the Soviet Union circa 1955. I’d wander through dark corridors, fending off rogue androids while unraveling the mystery of a utopian paradise run amok. Simple.

Moments later, a developer shot me forward into a small open world where I was hoisting spore-infected monsters into the air with the flick of my wrist and driving a car through a pack of androids like they were bowling pins. I’d barely even begun to see the full scope of the project in those first three hours.

Atomic Heart - Arlekino Gameplay Trailer | The Game Awards 2022

Atomic Heart seems to pride itself on its unpredictable nature. Not even its visually eclectic trailers have really captured how much is happening underneath the hood in what’s shaping up to be an incredibly ambitious debut from developer Mundfish. Based on my few hours with it, Atomic Heart feels like the kind of game that’ll be impossible to pigeonhole. While it’ll be tempting to compare it to games like Bioshock, it’s an entirely unique creative swing for a fresh studio looking to make a name for itself. While I’m not sure if every one of its myriad of ideas will land based on my time with it, Mundfish is throwing enough darts here that it’s bound to land a few bullseyes.

I, Comrade

Atomic Heart knows how to make an entrance. My demo begins right at the top of the game, with an introductory sequence reminiscent of Half-Life’s iconic trip around Black Mesa. This time, I’m riding down a stream on a futuristic paddle boat. It’s an idyllic vision of the future, like I’m at a Disney theme park. A friendly drone flies to me and hands me a glass of soda, which I sip while watching little slice-of-life vignettes occur next to me. It all seems too good to be true.

It is, of course. The story takes place in an alternate version of 1955 in which the Soviet Union won World War 2 and become a technological powerhouse. After creating a wonder material called polymer, the USSR was transformed into a communist paradise full of intelligent robots that live in harmony with humans. One rogue hack later, everything goes south and the machines turn into murderous monsters hellbent on killing the protagonist, an intelligence agent tasked with finding who’s responsible.

A robot's face pulls apart as it screams in Atomic Heart.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Off the bat, I’ll stress that it’s impossible to judge Atomic Heart’s political ambitions based on such a small slice. It takes some clear jabs at the concept of communism but swings just as hard at capitalism. It’s unclear early on if it’s looking to make a commentary about either, or if it’s simply interested in irreverent farce a la Far Cry. Publisher Focus Interactive admitted that it was initially hesitant to pick it up initially because of that aspect, but the label seems confident in where the final game landed tonally, which is encouraging.

“If you need any more proof that the lines between big and mid-budget are blurring, Atomic Heart seems to offer a shining example.”

Regardless of how that particular thread plays out, I already find Atomic Heart’s narrative focus compelling. While early trailers have purely emphasized action, I got a much more story-heavy experience that really let me bask in its creative alt-history universe. My first hour is particularly engrossing as it plays with an awe-inspiring scale. I gaze up at hulking statues of USSR leaders, watch a massive parade move through the streets, and get a bird’s eye view of the entire city thanks to a flying jalopy. Everything about the art design is triumphant, from its red-soaked streets to its varied robot designs.

That’s made all the more impressive by its tech, which seems like an astonishing feat for a first-time studio funded by a AA publisher. Like A Plague Tale: Requiem, its hyper-detailed visuals punch well above their weight class. More jaw-dropping, though, is that the game does not feature a single load screen. There are some clever load masks here or there, but my demo has me seamlessly jumping between the opening stream ride, a massive palace, that aerial tour of the world, and the dark corridors where the action begins to unfurl. If you need any more proof that the lines between big and mid-budget are blurring, Atomic Heart seems to offer a shining example.

The robot uprising

While narrative is at the forefront, Atomic Heart is also an incredibly systems-heavy action game. In fact, I’d barely even understand half of it until the dev team showed me an overview video after my hands-on time. Its opening “dungeon” would have you thinking it’s a standard Bioshock-like. After getting attacked by rogue robots, I’m thrown into a dark lab and forced to sneak around corridors as I loot for materials and face robots. I can sneak up on a foe to deactivate it with a button mash, but much of my gameplay would revolve around head-on action.

Player character electrocuting AI robots in Atomic Heart.
Mundfish

My take on the action is a little skewed, as my demo was mistakenly set to “hard.” And let me tell you: it was, indeed, hard. Equipped with only an ax and a shotgun with just a few shells early on, I had to carefully duck and weave as agile androids launched a rush of deadly kicks and punches at me. I’d have to do some careful juggling as I pressed B to perform a strafing dodge and follow up with a heavy strike. Timing was everything, even on the simplest encounters, as if I was playing a punishing Souls game in first-person. I found myself naturally moving in my chair alongside my character, making combat feel particularly physical.

Naturally, the game is much more forgiving on its normal difficulty, but the top-level play did expose a few challenges with its core systems. Chaining precise moves at a fast pace in first-person isn’t exactly easy, and I often found myself dying as I backed into some geometry unknowingly and had no way of escaping a flurry of attacks. The demo was stingy with its checkpointing too, so a death would force me to sit through tutorial pop-ups again or re-loot entire rooms (which can, fortunately, be accomplished easily by holding down the loot button and hovering from object to object).

Though I struggled with parts of its melee-driven opening, I quickly learned that the first few hours aren’t exactly a full representation of the actual game — not by a long shot. When I was kicked forward to a mid-game slice, which takes players into a more open-ended hub world that almost resembles Halo Infinite’s grassy Zeta Halo, I’m given a much bigger arsenal. Here, I’m playing an over-the-top shooter that mixes gunplay with special powers. I come up on a pack of drones and press my left bumper to force pull them into the air. After peppering them with a few shots from my electric handgun, I release the button to send them slamming into the ground. Later, I’ll douse some enemies in gray goo and unleash an electric bolt to paralyze them.

A small robot with deadly scythes rushes toward the player in Atomic Heart.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

That portion had me more excited about combat, as I began to see more of a sandbox potential to its action. With 13 weapons, a slew of craftable mods for each, a myriad of special powers, and upgrades to unlock, I get the sense that Atomic Heart will be a dream for those who love to tinker with their combat systems. There’s a lot of potential to build specific loadouts, finding the right synergy between powers and weapons. All I’m curious to see is how Atomic Heart gets from point A to point B, moving from that almost stealth-horror opening to its power-fantasy experimentation.

Full of surprises

After playing a good four hours (the core story is expected to last 25, though side-content will take it closer to 40), only one thing is clear about Atomic Heart: it does not want to bore you. It’s an entirely unpredictable game, constantly building on its gameplay, playing with genre, and making tonal leaps at every turn. One minute, I’m terrified as dead-eyed androids hunt me down. The next, a horny crafting machine tries to have its way with me in an absurd — though admittedly crass — comedic bit.

There’s a bit of a kitchen sink design philosophy at play here, as Mundfish has loaded this up with as many ideas as it can fit. There’s a crafting mechanic, open-world exploration between linear dungeons, a complex AI ecosystem that dictates how enemies act, and much more that went entirely over my head during my four hours. Staff at Focus Entertainment tell me the game originally had plans for a full co-op mode too, which was eventually cut due to its ballooning scale. I don’t think anyone who’s been following the game’s marketing will have any sense of its scope until they play it – and even then, I get the sense that it’s not going to stop taking creative swings until the credits roll.

A character attacks an enemy in Atomic Heart.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

That approach made much more sense when I spoke to Game Director Robert Bagratuni on-site at the demo event. During a chat, I asked him about some of the games that influenced the studio’s debut. He mentioned the Bioshock comparisons early trailers have earned and sort of sighed at the idea. He explained that he sees little value in simply making “clones” of other games; anyone who wants to play Bioshock can simply play Bioshock. Instead, Bagratuni wants to genuinely surprise players, constantly adding new layers to the action so it never feels like the game has shown you everything there is to see.

It’s an admirable approach, though one that I imagine will be the game’s ultimate test. There were moments when I wondered if the full game could wind up feeling a little unfocused. For now, I’m assuming that’s simply a byproduct of being flung into a mid-game section with most of my powers unlocked, rather than easing into it naturally. Even so, I’m left a little torn by its chameleon nature. Its more directed opening had me hooked from a story level, but less engaged in combat. That flipped later on, as I had more fun blasting androids in a sandbox at the expense of narrative momentum. I hope to see the two meet in the middle in the final product.

All of this will come down to execution. Mundfish has no shortage of ideas, but it’ll need to prove that it knows how to connect them all into a final project that feels cohesive. It’s a tall order for a first-time studio, but the effort and passion are certainly there. Even if it doesn’t wind up landing every punch, I imagine that its constant surprises will be enough to keep me engrossed in its promising sci-fi mystery. I’ll take some oddball creative swings from a fresh studio over a templatized genre piece any time.

Atomic Heart launches on February 21 for PS4, PS5, Xbox One, Xbox Series X/S, and PC.

Editors' Recommendations

Giovanni Colantonio
Giovanni is a writer and video producer focusing on happenings in the video game industry. He has contributed stories to…
The impending Xbox 360 Store closure makes me wary of Game Pass’ future
The Xbox logo.

I'm an avid Xbox Game Pass user, often trying almost every game that comes to the service and closely following the games coming to and leaving the service each month. Following some recent announcements by Microsoft, though, I've been thinking a lot more about something else about Xbox Game Pass and Microsoft's current digital-focused Xbox storefronts and ecosystem: what happens when it all goes away?
Microsoft announced last week that it will shut down the Xbox 360 Store in July 2024. After that day, it will be impossible to buy games, movies, or TV shows digitally on the Xbox 360 store; it's just like what happened with the 3DS and Wii U eShops earlier this year. That announcement also came not long after Microsoft revealed it would replace Xbox Live Gold with Xbox Game Pass Core in September. With these changes, Microsoft is stamping out any support or focus its giving to the Xbox 360's era as a platform. As someone who grew up mostly playing Xbox 360, seeing these things I grew up with go away is saddening. It's also making me think about the day this will eventually happen to Xbox Game Pass or the store on the Xbox One and Xbox Series X/S.

Frankly, I'm not as concerned that Microsoft is going to do it anytime soon. Microsoft has given no indication that it plans on abandoning Xbox Game Pass. It's a really successful subscription service heavily integrated into all of its current platforms, there are titles confirmed to launch day one on it into 2024 and beyond, and Xbox initiatives like Play Anywhere and Smart Delivery ensure that at least some version of most Xbox games are available on other platforms. While I expect it to be the primary part of Microsoft's gaming strategy over the next decade, as someone who mainly played Xbox 360 growing up and is now seeing its storefront and subscription service go away, I'm now thinking about what the end of the Game Pass era will look like.
These recent actions have indicated that Microsoft will eventually be willing to do the same to the storefronts and subscription service we're currently using. Even after the backlash PlayStation, Nintendo, and Xbox all faced from these announcements, Sony is the only one that has backtracked its plans to close down older digital storefronts, at least temporarily. Xbox Game Pass is the current hotness for Microsoft, but what happens come the day it isn't? A lot more games are digital-only or tied to a subscription this generation, and those are the games most at risk of being lost if a digital storefront shuts down.
What happens to the Xbox console versions of games like Pentiment or Immortality on Xbox once Xbox Game Pass and the current iteration of the Xbox Store are shuttered? Yes, they can be played on PC, but the Xbox console version will be lost forever. And right now, it doesn't seem like Microsoft has any publicly shared plans to permanently preserve those experiences, nor has it done so for all of the Xbox 360 digital games going away. Game preservation is a significant problem facing the game industry, and Microsoft has just made a move showing that it's on the wrong side of that effort. 

Read more
Starfield’s file size is massive no matter what platform you’re playing on
A spacecraft in Starfield.

The file sizes for Starfield finally appeared across some of the storefronts it's available on now that it's available to preload. As a result, we've learned just how massive the game is.
On Steam, Bethesda recommends that players have 125 GB of space for the game, but Microsoft's own launcher shows an even bigger PC install size of 139.84 GB for Starfield. That size is only slightly smaller on the console, with the Xbox Store showing me that the game will take up 117.07 GB on my Xbox Series X. It's now very understandable why Microsoft is launching a 1 TB version of the Xbox Series S around Starfield; still, the game will even take over a tenth of that system's memory if players aren't expanding it at all. 
This 110+ GB file size across all platforms for Starfield demonstrates just how big Bethesda's upcoming sci-fi RPG will be. It also follows a recent trend of even single-player taking up gigantic chunks of your game system's memory. This year alone, we've seen Star Wars Jedi: Survivor take up over 130 GB of space on consoles, while Baldur's Gate 3 clocks in at 125.14 GB currently. As games get bigger with more detail, it's clear that our gaming platforms will be able to accommodate fewer and fewer games on their SSDs going forward. 
At least you can play the game via Xbox Cloud Gaming if none of your platforms can accommodate that file size. Starfield will be released for PC and Xbox Series X/S on September 6. Those who pre-order the Premium Edition will get access on September 1, though.  

Read more
You can’t play Baldur’s Gate 3 on Xbox, but you can play these 6 Game Pass RPGs
A player conversation in Baldur's Gate 3.

Baldur's Gate 3 just launched on PC on August 3 and comes to PlayStation 5 shortly on September 6. Unfortunately, an Xbox Series X/S version of the RPG does not have any concrete release date. Developer Larian Studios explained in a community post that this is because it doesn't "want to compromise on quality and feel it would be a shame to downscale to 30 [frames per second, aka fps] or make other compromises to hit an arbitrary date." Still, it's disappointing that Xbox players can't get in on the fun anytime soon. Thankfully, there isn't a shortage of alternatives on Microsoft's gaming platforms.
Xbox Game Pass is home to dozens of RPGs, many of which share the same computer-RPG roots as Baldur's Gate 3. While Xbox players might not be able to enjoy Larian Studios' shockingly thorough and immensely enjoyable Dungeons & Dragons CRPG just yet, they can't go wrong playing these six titles right now. 
Fallout: New Vegas

Where Baldur's Gate 3 may be the pinnacle of fantasy RPG games inspired by Dungeons & Dragons, Fallout: New Vegas is that for postapocalyptic RPGs. This game from Obsidian Entertainment and Bethesda Softworks -- both of which are now owned by Microsoft -- first released in 2010. Despite some in-game glitches that still persist, the Xbox 360 version of Fallout: New Vegas on Xbox Game Pass is just as enthralling of a role-playing experience as it was nearly 13 years ago. The Xbox 360 version can even be played at 60 fps on Xbox Series X and Xbox Series S, thanks to the FPS Boost feature.
Like Baldur's Gate 3, it's a faithful follow-up to some classic CRPGs that give players a massive amount of choice as they complete their adventure however they see fit. You can have endless fun exploring the world and creating experiences that feel personal to you while dealing with its eclectic cast of factions and characters. While it's a bit rough around the edges in certain aspects, New Vegas is still one of the best RPGs ever made. As such, it's worth replaying or trying first the first time if you want to play an RPG, but can't experience Baldur's Gate 3 right now.  
Pillars of Eternity and Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire

Read more