Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Xbox Series X vs. PlayStation 5, one year later: Which console is king?

It’s hard to believe that we’re already one year into the life spans of the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X/S — mostly because many players still haven’t been able to buy them.

It’s no stretch to say that this has been one of the most frustrating and unstable console generation launches in the video game industry’s history. Launching a system during a pandemic would already be hard enough on its own. But toss in a chip shortage, and you have a set of consoles that are incredibly difficult to track down and don’t yet have a year’s worth of games to reward that effort due to a slew of delays. Even so, both Sony and Microsoft have created powerful gaming machines that are still worthy of being excited about heading into a stacked 2022.

Both the PS5 and Xbox Series X/S have their own strengths, with each filling a different role for gamers. But in the spirit of friendly competition, we can’t help but ask: Which console came out on top in their opening year?


When discussing pure power, the difference between the PS5 and Xbox Series X is almost negligible. Both systems are about on par with one another, with minor differences. Both systems are capable of outputting 8K visuals and running games at 120 frames per second (fps). At the moment, there’s no huge difference when it comes to playing a game on Series X or PS5, even if Microsoft’s console is running a slightly better CPU and GPU.

The internals of an Xbox Series X pulled apart.

The Xbox Series X does have an edge, though it doesn’t have to do with visuals. Its internal hard drive is a bit bigger than the PS5’s. That was more noticeable at launch, when the PS5’s external storage solutions were more limited. Sony has since remedied the problem by adding support for more drives, but the smaller onboard storage does stand out. I’ve found myself deleting games far more often on my PS5 than I have on my Series X. The extra gigabytes really do make a difference when game files are so big.

The Series X gets the edge in this department, but it’s more a technicality than anything. The system is more powerful on paper, but we haven’t seen that manifest in any meaningful way that makes the PS5 look weaker. Storage is really the one aspect that’s made a difference for me in the past year of gaming.

Advantage: Xbox Series X


When it comes to console features, Sony has a clear advantage. Microsoft took a conservative approach to this console generation and built a straight home console with no real gimmicks. Its biggest marketing push was the promise of Smart Delivery, which allows Xbox One owners to carry games over to Series X when they upgrade. However, that’s started to feel like little more than a clever marketing spin over the past years, akin to Sega’s “Blast Processing.” The PS5 also supports cross-generational purchases for several of its games. It doesn’t have a fancy name, but it’s essentially the same thing.

The PS5 has brought several innovations to the table, though with mixed results. The DualSense controller promised more immersive gaming thanks to haptic feedback and adaptive triggers. In some cases, that’s really worked. Both Returnal and Astro’s Playroom are transformative experiences that really benefit from extra sensations. Other games, like Marvel’s Spider-Man: Miles Morales, hardly use the controller’s gimmick at all. And other titles can be downright painful to play at times. Pulling highly resistant triggers to shoot in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is genuinely unpleasant.

Geoff Keighley holding DualSense.
The Game Awards creator, Geoff Keighley holding the PS5 DualSense controller.

Other promising features have been a mixed bag. The system’s card feels like a revelation when playing games like Deathloop, but developers have been slow to fully adopt it. I’m not finding many games that use cards to give useful time estimates or ways to fast travel to objectives. Sony’s first-party games tend to use it well, but it still hasn’t lived up to its potential. Other initially exciting features, like the ability to look up a guide video on the fly, have barely made a difference. For the most part, I haven’t engaged with many of the PS5’s nuanced features.

Even if the PS5 hasn’t lived up to its ambitions, I still appreciate having more features to play around with. At worst, developers ignore them altogether and it feels like I’m playing a game on any old system. But I’m still having unique experiences on PS5 every so often that change the way I engage with games. The Series X plays it straight by comparison and still feels a little less special for it one year later.

Advantage: PS5


In the past, consoles would be defined by their library of first-party exclusives. The Series X has completely flipped that script and showed that exclusives aren’t as important as they used to be. I’ll get to that shortly, but it’s still worthwhile to look at each system’s “year one” library, as they speak to each company’s strategy.

When it comes to exclusives, it’s a bit one-sided here. Sony had a clear advantage right from launch by releasing Marvel’s Spider-Man: Miles Morales, Demon’s Souls, Sackboy: A Big Adventure, and Astro’s Playroom. Over the next 12 months, it would release a string of critically acclaimed hits in Returnal, Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart, and Deathloop. By comparison, Microsoft has very few exclusives to its name. Forza Horizon 5 is frankly one of the few “system sellers” to release for the Series X, and it just came out mere days ago. Exclusive games simply aren’t part of Microsoft’s long-term strategy — for now, at least.

Selene Vassos from Returnal.

Granted, Sony made some big launch year promises it couldn’t deliver on. Heavy hitters like Horizon Forbidden West and God of War Ragnarok were delayed to 2022, which felt inevitable. There’s still only a handful of “must-have” exclusives on the system, which has made the mad dash to secure one a bit silly. In truth, neither console is really worth buying based on game library alone. Someone who’s still on a PS4 or Xbox One frankly hasn’t missed much other than two or three solid games.

Even so, the PS5 game library has an obvious advantage here. Its few exclusives are all top-notch and show why Sony’s commitment to high-quality exclusives still pays off. The fact that Returnal, a totally new IP from a smaller studio, is one of the PS5’s best games shows that Sony is taking all of its exclusives seriously. Every time it releases one, you know it means business.

Advantage: PS5

Long-term value

In the past, this conversation would have stopped there. Sony has the games, so what more is there to discuss? But Microsoft has ingeniously flipped the script, changing the way we think about a video game console’s function. That’s where Xbox Game Pass comes in.

Game Pass has only become a stronger value in the Xbox Series X generation. For one, all first-party Microsoft games come to it on day one. Encouraged by the strong reviews of Forza Horizon 5, but don’t want to spend $60 on it? You don’t have to if you have Game Pass. The same will be true for Halo Infinite next month, and it’s impossible to overstate how huge that is for Microsoft fans.

Multiple cars race in Mexico in Forza Horizon 5.

It’s not just the exclusives that benefit from Game Pass, though. Microsoft has shown that Game Pass pays off in the long run for those who buy third-party games. Outriders, MLB The Show 21, Scarlet Nexus, and It Takes Two are among some of the top 2021 releases that Game Pass subscribers simply didn’t need to buy. That’s $200 worth of games included with a subscription, and it’s only the tip of the iceberg. Buying a Series X and subscribing to Game Pass pays off in the long run, making the console a smarter investment.

The PS5 still has long-term potential thanks to its consistent library of exclusives, but the ecosystem isn’t as strong. Subscribing to PS Plus gives access to a few free games a month and the PS Plus Collection, but you’ll still pay for the biggest games individually. That’s not a problem; it’s how consoles have always worked. But Microsoft’s strength is that it’s reimagined that process and turned Xbox into a full service that’s worth buying into.

Advantage: Xbox Series X

Which console is king in 2021?

It sounds backwards considering Microsoft’s lack of console-selling exclusives, but the Xbox Series X is the most appealing console at the moment.

Microsoft’s goal over the past 12 months was to prove that the Xbox ecosystem is worth buying into, even after Halo Infinite was delayed outside of its launch year. It wasn’t an easy task, but every move the company has made with Game Pass has been effective. I can’t begin to describe how few games I’ve needed to buy this year. Interested in playing an indie like Unpacking or Moonglow Bay? It’s in my library already. Curious about Outriders, but not $60 curious? I didn’t need to spend an extra dime to play it. I bought Scarlet Nexus at launch for full price and ended up putting it down after six hours. I was kicking myself months later when it was added to Game Pass.

Xbox Series X sitting against a wall.

Granted, if you don’t want to buy into Game Pass, the Series X becomes much less appealing. Its power advantage over the PS5 is negligible and it lacks some of the bells and whistles that make Sony’s console so fun. A Series X is a long-term financial commitment that not every player will be comfortable making. In that sense, the PS5 has made a stronger case for being a system you don’t need to keep pumping money into.

I’m pitting these two systems against one another here for fun, but make no mistake: Sony and Microsoft aren’t really in competition with one another. Or at least, not in the same way that we’re used to. Both companies are taking a page out of Nintendo’s book by charting their own niche in the gaming space. Sony wants to double down on huge, cinematic action games that feel like Hollywood movies. Microsoft wants to hook players into its subscription service and make it as essential as a Netflix account. Those are entirely different goals.

The truth is that both Sony and Microsoft have proved what they wanted to prove in the last year. There’s no winner or loser; it’s just a matter of which approach better suits your gaming habits. But, hey, for the sake of seeing this matchup through, I have to declare a victor, right?

Winner: Xbox Series X

Editors' Recommendations

Giovanni Colantonio
Giovanni is a writer and video producer focusing on happenings in the video game industry. He has contributed stories to…
Dreams live support is ending — and that’s a big misstep for PlayStation
Art fights a giant bird in Dreams.

Sony could’ve had its own popular proprietary game engine and metaverse. Instead, it just let it slip through its fingers.

Media Molecule is ending live support for Dreams, its highly ambitious game-creating and playing tool for PS4, on September 1. Its servers are staying online for now -- and it has a few more content updates in the pipeline before then -- but after August, there will be no new tools, ports, or events for Dreams. That means it’s not coming to PS5, PlayStation VR2, and, most critically, PC.

Read more
The Lord of the Rings: Gollum is unintentionally delightful
lord of the rings gollum art

One does not simply walk into Mordor; instead, one might opt to climb up a wall of vines or jump from platform to platform. That’s the crux of what The Lord of the Rings: Gollum is all about.

The game positions the player as the classic Lord of the Rings villain, shining light on his previously unexplored backstory, which includes his capture and subsequent escape from the clutches of evil. It’s a novel concept that I wasn’t exactly sure would work before trying it out for myself. Given all that, I knew I needed to play The Lord of the Rings: Gollum at PAX East, and after going hands-on with it, I came away with mixed thoughts that lean positive, with more than a few caveats.

Read more
The Finals is the shake-up the competitive first-person shooter scene needs
A player stands up against a wall in a The Finals screenshot.

While I enjoy playing first-person shooters occasionally, it's a genre I've struggled to become a hardcore fan of. To me, it has stagnated, with recent Call of Duty and Battlefield games feeling like little more than rehashes of the same quick-kill-focused gameplay on maps that all blend together after a while. That's why The Finals' longer time-to-kill, unique match objectives, and focus on level destruction all feel like a breath of fresh air.
THE FINALS Closed Beta Trailer
Developed by Embark Studios, the new multiplayer shooter is a notable change of pace for a stagnating genre. Because it takes a lot of effort to defeat an opponent, and the map is continuously changing as you do so, no two matches feel quite the same. I can attest to that, as I recently went hands-on with it and had that exact experience. Lots of thrilling, emergent moments organically happened during each match, leading to some of the most memorable matches I've had playing a first-person shooter in years.
If you've always enjoyed destructible environments in your FPS games and enjoy inventive competitive shooters that aren't just trying to chase what is popular, then you'll want to check out The Finals.
Map mayhem
The Finals' primary mode, Extraction, is framed as a game show where four teams compete to earn the most money during a match. Players do this by locating vaults on a map, obtaining cash boxes, and delivering them to a cash-out station. Extra money is rewarded for kills and a team's total is halved if they are completely wiped. The basics of the FPS gameplay are approachable enough for anyone who has played a game in this genre before. That said, its longer time-to-kill also helps that mission and gives players time to appreciate just how reactive its world is.
In the Closed Beta preview build, I played on two maps based on Monaco and Seoul. Each contains points of interest connected by some indoor arenas and long outdoor corridors that you'd come to expect from an FPS map. But it only stays that way for a short time. As soon as explosives get involved, the map transforms as buildings crumble and the environment reacts to the players. It stays that way too, as developer Embark Studios' server-side technology tracks and accommodates any changes to the map.
Last year, the developers at Embark Studios told Digital Trends that they hope this technology would make other developers panic. While we don't think The Finals will go that far, it certainly handles destruction better than other games that have tried to boast similar strengths, like Crackdown 3 or Battlefield 2042. It's not only a neat technical feat, but it also opens up many organic situations you don't get in other FPS games.

For example, a building was crumbling as I retrieved a cash box and headed to a cash-out station. I was under fire, and an opponent's rocket completely destroyed the pathway to get me to the building my teammates were in. I knew I didn't want the team chasing me to get ahold of the cash box, so I sacrificed myself by throwing the vault across that gap to my teammate before proceeding to hold enemies off as they delivered it to a station.
Even the greenery reacts to the player, especially when they have a flamethrower or flame grenade. At one moment, the station my team was delivering to was out in the open in a park. Other teams were coming at us from all angles, so I threw several fire grenades, and my teammate used a flamethrower. Doing this, we set most of the park aflame, forcing our opponents into pathways where we could pick them off more easily. Floors can crumble beneath you, staircases that get you to objectives can be destroyed, and a lot of map mayhem helps define each match of The Finals.
Leaving your mark
The Finals' destruction creates some compelling dynamics, making the player feel like they are shaping the world that each match takes place in. Players can customize their characters with outfits and special loadouts ahead of matches, and some of these options allow them to set down jump pads and ziplines or use a grappling hook to improve mobility. Turrets, barriers, and mines are also equippable, which can be used to direct the flow of battle and herd opponents into certain sections of the map. One particularly memorable moment saw my team calling two elevators in Seoul, only to find that another team had put a turret in one and all of themselves in another.

Read more