Skip to main content

An Apple media super-bundle could launch as soon as 2020

In October, news emerged that Apple was in the early stages of discussing a streaming subscription bundle with music labels. The plan would be to create a single monthly price for both Apple Music and Apple TV+, the company’s video streaming service that launched on November 1. Now, a new report suggests that an Apple media bundle — consisting of Apple Music, Apple TV+, and Apple News — could arrive as early as next year, according to Bloomberg.

The report points to “a provision that Apple included in deals with publishers that lets the iPhone maker bundle the News+ subscription service with other paid digital offerings,” citing unnamed people who are apparently familiar with these matters.

Not all news publishers nor music labels are comfortable with the idea, however, and are concerned that any discounts offered by Apple could end up hurting revenues. Nonetheless, a bundled approach to service subscriptions is not only logical, but it could also give Apple an enormous advantage as competition for consumers’ entertainment budgets intensifies among tech and media giants.

Apple has spent the last several years building a portfolio of services including Apple Music, Apple News+, Apple Arcade, and Apple TV+. Though each of these products on their own isn’t necessarily better than the competition, together they could create a compelling entertainment package that hits the Apple brand’s sweet spot of quality paired with convenience.

An Apple-centric media bundle would prove difficult for its competitors to match. You can already bundle Spotify Premium with Hulu, and Disney has announced that there will be bundled savings for those who sign up for Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+. But Disney lacks a gaming service and it will have less room to play with pricing on the music front since it doesn’t own Spotify.

Netflix, still the 800-pound gorilla in the video streaming space, doesn’t operate any other media services and has historically relied on service providers like Comcast for any customers acquired through bundling.

Google is theoretically in a position to make its own mega-media bundle. It has Google Play Music (soon to be discontinued in favor of YouTube Music), YouTube TV, and its newly announced Stadia gaming subscription service. But Google’s services have always felt somewhat disjointed, each operating in its own space, without much cohesiveness. Despite its efforts with YouTube Originals, Google’s on-demand video catalog is severely lacking.

Amazon looks to be best positioned to offer a competing bundle of services to an Apple mega-bundle. It already runs music and video streaming services and both have been steadily growing. It owns its own game studio, and its Kindle e-book business has continued to thrive even as others in the space have struggled. Let’s not forget, it’s a major hardware and voice assistant player too. Perhaps Amazon’s greatest strength is its proven appetite for offering products and services at lower prices than everyone else, even if it means doing so at a loss.

So what might an Apple media bundle cost? Apple Music is currently $10 per month. Apple TV+ will be $5 per month when it launches. Apple Arcade is another $5 per month, and Apple News+ is $10. Without getting into things like family plans, that puts the current Apple services total at $30 per month. Clearly there would need to be a discount to make this more attractive that signing up for each product individually, but how much of a discount would it take?

Apple TV+ is the only one of Apple’s media services to which the company can claim 100% ownership of the content. It’s no coincidence that Apple has offered a year’s worth of Apple TV+ to new buyers of most Apple devices. Unlike Apple Music, there’s presumably no payout to third parties regardless of how many times people stream shows on Apple TV+.

If we assume Apple would be willing to keep eating that $5 per month cost to get a guaranteed revenue stream, that bundle price drops to $25. Despite the limited amount of content that will be on Apple TV+ at launch, this is starting to look like a decent value.

But Apple does more than media. Many of its customers pay for iCloud’s additional storage. 2TB costs $10 per month. What if Apple threw in 1TB of iCloud storage in for that $25 per month price?

If you’re hemming and hawing, you’re not alone — going all-in with one company for all of these services is a big step. And yet, we’ve only just glimpsed what Apple has in store for consumers, especially when it comes to streaming video. The Apple TV app may not be quite what Steve Jobs had in mind when he famously told his biographer, Walter Isaacson, that he’d cracked the code on TV, but it’s got enormous potential now that it has escaped the bounds of the Apple TV streaming device.

Apple’s ability to pull off such an all-encompassing strategy will depend on gaining music labels’ blessings, which at the moment seems in doubt. But betting against Apple is rarely a winning strategy, and the company has a long history of getting the music industry to see things from Apple’s perspective.

If Apple succeeds and creates a media mega-bundle, you can be sure Amazon and Google will follow suit. If and when that happens, it will be the start of a new era in the streaming wars. Will consumers end up the winners in such a competitive landscape? We’ll have to wait and see.

Editors' Recommendations

Simon Cohen
Contributing Editor, A/V
Simon Cohen covers a variety of consumer technologies, but has a special interest in audio and video products, like…
New Apple TV 4K tweaks the internals and the price
Apple TV 4K 2022.

Apple today announced a new version of Apple TV 4K. It's the third generation of what we consider to be the best streaming device you can buy, and Apple's not really messing with things too much. Same general design. Same general function. But the internals have been tweaked that allow this 2022 model (which follows the models released in September 2017 and May 2021) to work better with more TVs — and to allow for a little more flexibility in price.

Here are the big deals: There are now two versions of Apple TV 4K (or SKUs, for those of you who prefer inside-baseball terms). There's a model that's Wi-Fi only with 64GB of storage for $130, or a model with Wi-Fi and Ethernet with 128GB of storage for $150. For our money, we'd just go ahead and spend the extra $20.

Read more
T-Mobile adding a free year of Apple TV+ to its most expensive plans
Apple TV icon on Apple TV.

T-Mobile today announced that it's giving subscribers to its most expensive mobile plan a free subscription to Apple TV+, which normally costs $60 a year. Those who are subscribed to the Magenta Max plan — which costs $85 a month for a single line — will get Apple's streaming service for free. If you've got T-Mobile's Magenta plan, which costs $70 a month for one line, you'll get six months of Apple TV+ for free.

The perk takes effect on August 31, 2022, and it's good for the foreseeable future. (A previous version of this story stated it was just for one year, but that's legacy copy on T-Mobile's website for the old perk that's being supplanted.)

Read more
New Siri remote for Apple TV could be easier to find with an embedded AirTag
The Siri Remote in someone's hand.

Buried deep inside the code for Apple's latest mobile software -- iOS 16 -- is a reference to "SiriRemote4" and "WirelessRemoteFirmware.4," according to MacRumors, which noted the discovery made by a contributor at AppleDB, an online database of Apple software and devices. Given that all previous Siri remotes (the two original touchpad editions, plus the newest silver model) have been accounted for through other references like "SiriRemote3," the conclusion is that Apple is readying a fourth generation of this device.

Why is the the reference in a beta of iOS, when the Apple TV runs tvOS? On the one hand, it could simply be that Apple needs to keep its mobile remote functionality (which is now embedded in an iPhone's Control Center) up to date with whatever features a new remote might offer. Or, it could be because Apple is planning to add a feature to the next Apple TV remote that would require (or at least benefit from) an iPhone. And that feature could be a detailed Find My function, courtesy of Apple's AirTag technology.

Read more