Skip to main content

24 years later, Y2K caught up to us

bad tech predictions y2k
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Hysteria. A media flurry. Basements full of canned beans. That was the situation leading up to the turn of the century, just 24 short years ago — for those of us who remember it. Of course, the Y2K frenzy ended up being unfounded, and in retrospect, most of us have since chalked up the silly worries to nothing more than apocalyptic anxiety.

That’s what makes the ongoing events of last night so shocking. Not only is a Y2K-level event possible — it just happened.

Recommended Videos

Just like that, the entire technical infrastructure of our world collapsed in a moment. Seemingly everything except our own personal devices was offline — leaving banks, airports, and even 911 call centers in the dark. Though many of us sitting at home aren’t experiencing the weight of the situation the same way, the skies being emptied of planes and airports abandoned help make the point.

The exact cause of the incident is as obscure as what people were saying leading up to Y2K — and for most people, it’ll never matter. A line of code in an update pushed through by a cybersecurity company resulting in mass Blue Screens of Death? Really? It’s as senseless and abstract as errors in the formatting of calendar data when the big numbers change.

The feeling of fragility, though, stays with you. It’s that nagging feeling that this whole system we all live in could implode overnight — and not even a company as big as Microsoft could fix the situation quickly.

It’s not just me who got a flashback to 1999, either. The creator of haveibeenpwned.com, the iconic website that checks whether your personal data has been compromised, took to X (formerly Twitter) to make that exact same comparison.

This is basically what we were all worried about with Y2K, except it's actually happened this time ☠️

— Troy Hunt (@troyhunt) July 19, 2024

I don’t think Hunt is implying that there’s some technical similarity to the Y2K countdown. His point, and mine, is that a technical glitch — no matter how small — could somehow disrupt the entire apparatus of modern life that we all depend on.

There are certainly lessons to be learned here from an IT infrastructure perspective — something I’m sure will be taken to heart by the industry at large. But maybe there’s another reminder to be had. Not that airlines should go back to Windows 3.1 and we should become Luddites waiting around for a cataclysm.

But to remember that there’s a brittle nature to the world we live in. And while technology has helped us tame the chaos, if we’re not careful, the whole house of cards can come tumbling down when just a single card wobbles under the pressure.

Maybe we’ve always known that in theory, but to see it happen in the real world? At the very least, it gives me some more empathy for my parents’ stockpiled basement in the winter of 1999.

Luke Larsen
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Luke Larsen is the Senior Editor of Computing, managing all content covering laptops, monitors, PC hardware, Macs, and more.
Apple M2 chip for powerful new Macs goes into production later this year
Board concept of Apple M2.

Apple’s M1 chip has been a revelation since it launched late last year, bringing a radical performance increase to the company’s Macs compared to their Intel predecessors. Now, it looks like the follow-up to the M1 is almost ready for showtime.

According to Nikkei Asia, the chips entered production this month. The outlet reports that the chips could start shipping to Apple as early as July of this year, with Macs containing them going on sale in the second half of 2021.

Read more
Tesla factories’ security cameras caught up in wider hack
Tesla Gigafactory

 

A Silicon Valley startup offering cloud-based security camera services has had its systems breached in an attack that gave hackers access to numerous live feeds, some of them coming from Tesla factories.

Read more
Meta faces lawsuit for training AI with pirated books
A silhouetted person holds a smartphone displaying the Facebook logo. They are standing in front of a sign showing the Meta logo.

In a recent lawsuit, Meta has been accused of using pirated books to train its AI models, with CEO Mark Zuckerberg's approval. As per Ars Technica, the lawsuit filed by authors including Ta-Nehisi Coates and Sarah Silverman in a California federal court, cite internal Meta communications indicating that the company utilized the Library Genesis (LibGen) dataset—a vast online repository known for hosting pirated books—despite internal concerns about the legality of using such material.

The authors argue that Meta's actions infringe upon their copyrights and could undermine the company's position with regulators. They claim that Meta's AI models, including Llama, were trained using their works without permission, potentially harming their livelihoods. Meta has defended its practices by invoking the "fair use" doctrine, asserting that using publicly available materials to train AI tools is legal in certain cases, such as "using text to statistically model language and generate original expression."

Read more