Skip to main content

Is your child safe from inappropriate apps on Apple App Store? A report says no

App Store screenshot on iPhone.
Bryan M. Wolfe / Digital Trends

Apps aimed at children have been available since the inception of the App Store. However, not all apps created for minors are safe to use. This is the main finding of a new survey conducted by two child safety organizations. The report presents the results of a 24-hour research study in which 800 apps were reviewed, and the findings are concerning.

The Heat Initiative and ParentsTogether Action study found that Apple’s App Store is a mass distributor of risky and inappropriate apps to children. Many apps have features that put children at risk of sexual abuse and exploitation, low self-esteem and poor body image, disordered eating, exposure to sexual and violent content, and more. Apple claims that the App Store is a safe place for children, but the study found that Apple takes no legal responsibility for the veracity of age ratings.

Recommended Videos

Of the 800 apps reviewed, more than 200 risky apps were identified. These apps have a combined total of more than 550 million downloads. As part of the study, the researchers examined five categories of apps: chat, beauty, diet and weight loss, internet access, and gaming. They focused on apps with an age rating of 4+, 9+, or 12+. Apps rated 17+ were not included in the documentation.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

The study revealed several startling findings. For example, it uncovered 25 chat apps that made it possible for strangers to communicate with minors. Other apps are designed to provide unfiltered internet access, even though filters at home or school are supposed to block banned sites.

Elsewhere, several beauty and body-related apps encouraged fasting and setting starvation-level calorie goals. Others, including “gaming” apps, focused on users providing naked photos and ones focused on violence.

Apple describes the App Store as a “trusted place” where users can safely discover and download apps. Apple conducts automated and manual checks on every app available in the App Store to ensure this safety. Additionally, the company has introduced safety features like Screen Time to protect underage users. However, with nearly 2 million apps hosted on the platform for devices like the iPad Air and iPhone 16, it would be impossible for Apple to identify every problematic app. As Apple states, “App Store security measures alone can never be perfect.”

App Store screenshot on iPhone.
Bryan M. Wolfe / Digital Trends

Ona personal note, my daughter recently turned 18, and I have allowed her to use apps since she was around 2. Over those 16 years, we discovered many apps that were marketed toward minors, but were highly inappropriate. As she grew older and her curiosity increased, I found it more challenging to shield her from the more explicit content on the App Store. However, I’d like to think that thanks to the tools Apple has provided over the years and my parenting efforts, she was protected from most, but no doubt not all, of the negative influences.

The survey makers suggest several ways to improve the App Store situation, including adding third-party reviews, increasing App Store rating process transparency, enforcing age ratings with accountability, and implementing more effective parental controls. These all sound like valuable solutions to consider, although some bad apples will no doubt remain even then.

The most effective way to protect minors from harmful content is for Apple to improve its process of identifying inappropriate apps before they receive approval. Apple should also collaborate with external organizations such as Heat Initiative and ParentsTogether Action to more rapidly identify and address any dangerous apps that may have slipped through the approval process. Even then, the best defense is engaged and informed parenting.

Parents can easily block the installation of new apps on their children’s devices using existing tools. They can also monitor the apps that have already been installed to ensure they are appropriate. This involves briefly using the apps themselves to verify that they are safe.

Bryan M. Wolfe
Bryan M. Wolfe has over a decade of experience as a technology writer. He writes about mobile.
Apple says iPhone 16e users don’t care about MagSafe — they’re probably right
A group of iPhone 16e phones arranged in a pattern.

The iPhone 16e launches today, and the first reviews are starting to appear online. One review that caught my attention was from John Gruber at Daring Fireball. The lengthy review has some information he picked up from Apple officials on why the company elected not to include MagSafe for wireless charging on the iPhone 16e. The reason is almost certainly on the mark and isn't all about saving money.

As we’ve already noted, Apple’s latest budget phone shares many features with the iPhone 16. However, the iPhone 16e is priced $200 lower. As a result, some features present in the iPhone 16 are omitted from the iPhone 16e, with MagSafe being one of them.

Read more
Apple may finally admit that 8GB isn’t enough RAM for an iPhone
Leaked render of iPhone 17 Pro Max front glass and rear camera bar module.

These days, 8GB of RAM is the baseline for Apple devices (the minimum amount required to run Apple Intelligence.) Several insiders have already suggested the iPhone 17 Pro could see a RAM boost up to 12GB, and now Jeff Pu of GFHK Tech Research has thrown his hat into the ring — and he agrees that it's likely.

For the past several generations, each new series of iPhone has seen an upgrade to its internals. The iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max both had 8GB of RAM compared to the 6GB in their non-Pro variants, while the full iPhone 16 lineup has 8GB. A jump to 12GB for the iPhone 17 Pro suggests it could have access to yet-to-be-announced Apple Intelligence features, but it also makes the phone more future-proof.

Read more
Early tests confirm Apple’s new chip significantly boosts iPhone 16e battery life
A press image of the iPhone 16e.

The iPhone 16e will launch officially tomorrow, February 27. Today, the results from the first tests of Apple’s all-new C1 modem for this budget phone have been released, and the news is promising.

Chinese review site Geekerwan conducted various 5G tests on the iPhone 16e’s C1 modem, which is noteworthy because it is Apple’s first modem for the iPhone. The tests revealed that the iPhone 16e’s speeds and reliability matched those of the iPhone 16, which is equipped with a Qualcomm modem. Perhaps even more impressively, Geekerwan found that the C1 modem consumed much less power than its competitor.

Read more