Skip to main content

Campbell’s swoons over soup sales from Apple’s iAds

iAdApple teamed up with Campbell’s Soup and Nielsen in a study that it claims proves iAds are twice as effective as traditional alternatives. And the claims don’t just insinuate the iOS marketing scheme can be successful – they make some sweeping statements about its superiority.

Apple’s iAds have been in the works for awhile and were introduced some months ago. Campbell’s was one of Apple’s first clients for the platform, and apparently is thrilled with the decision. According to AdAge, “Those exposed to one of Campbell’s iAds were more than twice as likely to recall it than those who had seen a TV ad.” In Nielsen’s five-week study, it appeared that consumers who viewed Campbell’s advertising on an iOS device “remembered the brand ‘Campbell’s’ five times more often than TV ad respondents, and the ad messaging three times more often.” What’s more is that participants exposed to iAds were four times more likely to buy Campbell’s products than those who saw TV commercials.

Recommended Videos

One discrepancy that seems worth noting is that the TV viewers were selected by Nielsen, whereas the iAd respondents were “recruited within various apps.” Even still, this just means that the participants chosen to respond to iAds are Apple owners to begin with, meaning they could be more prone to being affected by anything pushed to them through such a device – something advertisers should be excited to hear. Smartphones are naturally more interactive than television, and it seems like people are responding positively to this.

Director of global advertising for Campbell’s Soups Jennifer Gordon is convinced by Nielsen’s findings. “We have a lot of data that goes many years back for TV print, out of home and radio, but we’re searching for more validated metrics in mobile. This does show, in really traditionally brand metric terms, that iAd really outperformed.” Gordon also claimed the iAd numbers beat those for traditional online static banner ads. It doesn’t hurt that iAd campaigns are a fraction of the cost of TV ads. At the moment, our smartphones aren’t flooded with ads, but will they be as effective when it comes to that point?

Molly McHugh
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
Apple may finally admit that 8GB isn’t enough RAM for an iPhone
Leaked render of iPhone 17 Pro Max front glass and rear camera bar module.

These days, 8GB of RAM is the baseline for Apple devices (the minimum amount required to run Apple Intelligence.) Several insiders have already suggested the iPhone 17 Pro could see a RAM boost up to 12GB, and now Jeff Pu of GFHK Tech Research has thrown his hat into the ring — and he agrees that it's likely.

For the past several generations, each new series of iPhone has seen an upgrade to its internals. The iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max both had 8GB of RAM compared to the 6GB in their non-Pro variants, while the full iPhone 16 lineup has 8GB. A jump to 12GB for the iPhone 17 Pro suggests it could have access to yet-to-be-announced Apple Intelligence features, but it also makes the phone more future-proof.

Read more
Early tests confirm Apple’s new chip significantly boosts iPhone 16e battery life
A press image of the iPhone 16e.

The iPhone 16e will launch officially tomorrow, February 27. Today, the results from the first tests of Apple’s all-new C1 modem for this budget phone have been released, and the news is promising.

Chinese review site Geekerwan conducted various 5G tests on the iPhone 16e’s C1 modem, which is noteworthy because it is Apple’s first modem for the iPhone. The tests revealed that the iPhone 16e’s speeds and reliability matched those of the iPhone 16, which is equipped with a Qualcomm modem. Perhaps even more impressively, Geekerwan found that the C1 modem consumed much less power than its competitor.

Read more
Is the Apple iPhone 16e waterproof?
Hand holding iPhone 16e.

Apple's all-new iPhone 16e, its new $599 successor to the iPhone SE line, sports a series of changes, including an OLED panel and Face ID instead of the SE's Touch ID Home button. Its bezels are more prominent, and it comes in two different matte finishes: black and white. It's a svelte new phone that you'll likely gravitate to if you want something a bit lower-priced.

One major consideration you may want to keep in mind however, is its water resistance. With flagship iPhones featuring high levels of protection against water and dust, it makes sense to question whether the affordable iPhone 16e includes the same level of durability. With that in mind, is the iPhone 16e safe to take around water?
Is the iPhone 16e waterproof?

Read more