Skip to main content

I actually use all of Apple’s preinstalled iPhone apps — here’s why

Apple’s first-party iPhone apps aren’t necessarily the best. Apple Maps is getting better, but it’s still not quite as good as Google Maps. The Podcasts app is fine, but something like Pocket Casts is more powerful. The Mail app has its pros and cons, and first-party apps like Gmail or Outlook have more features.

But while third-party apps are usually technically better, they also don’t happen to come preinstalled with an iPhone — and that’s a powerful position for Apple to be in. And it’s one that I’ve succumbed to. In fact, if there’s a first-party iPhone app for something I need — whether it be music, podcasts, maps, or anything else — I use it. Turns out, I may be in the minority.

Recommended Videos

Here’s why I stick to Apple’s apps whenever possible.

It’s all about the ecosystem

Apple apps may not be quite as good as some third-party options, but it’s not always about whether or not the app itself works well — it’s about the ecosystem as a whole. Yes, the walled garden is real — and it’s pretty nice on the inside.

Apple seamlessly syncs data through iCloud for almost all of its apps, including Podcasts, Reminders, Notes, and more. This makes it easy to switch between iPhone, iPad, and Mac apps, without having to delve into the hellscape that is web apps. Sure, there are third-party options that offer apps for all of Apple’s platforms, but they don’t always sync as well as Apple’s apps do, and the result is an experience that simply isn’t as seamless. That’s not to say using first-party apps is always perfect — I regularly have to refresh my Podcasts to force them to sync, and the iPhone’s Mail app can have similar hang-ups. But they work far more often than they don’t.

iCloud storage on the iPhone 12 Pro Max
Andrew Martonik / Digital Trends

There are other benefits to staying within the ecosystem. For example, Siri really only works well with Apple’s apps. Now, that should probably change — Google and Amazon both offer frameworks for developers to build Assistant or Alexa support into their apps and services, and it would be awesome if Apple did the same. But until that happens, if you want to use Siri, as imperfect as it is, you’re stuck with first-party apps.

Of course, because these apps all exist within an ecosystem that you’ve already bought into, using first-party apps can also be cheaper. There are some great to-do apps out there, but they’re generally not free. Now, you could argue that many of those apps offer functionality that’s close to the Reminders app for free, only forcing you to pay for extra features, but why tempt yourself in the first place? As someone who’s (very) susceptible to upsells, I’d rather steer clear.

I’d rather use Apple’s apps than be upsold on features and subscriptions elsewhere.

There is one way in which first-party Apple apps are better than most others, and that’s privacy. Privacy concerns are actually one of the main reasons I switched from Android to an iPhone for my daily driver. Call me naive, but I really do value having better control over my privacy, and I feel more secure in the knowledge that Apple’s business model isn’t built around collecting my personal information. Third-party apps can open up many privacy concerns, even on iOS.

I hate having extra apps

Some people don’t mind having pages and pages of rarely used apps on their home screen. I am not one of those people. The fewer apps, the better for me. I’m not immune to downloading apps — for example, I’m happy to download a game, Netflix, or whatever else if I know I’ll use it regularly — but if there were a first-party replacement for those things, I would use it instead.

Now, as mentioned, that’s not because they’re better, or even as good in all cases. But they are “good enough.” Not a very glowing recommendation, I know — but having cross-app communication and integration into Apple’s ecosystem, plus not having to download extra apps, is worth that trade-off for me.

Christian de Looper
Christian de Looper is a long-time freelance writer who has covered every facet of the consumer tech and electric vehicle…
More evidence suggests iPhone 17 Air will borrow this Pixel design cue
Alleged concept render of the iPhone 17 Air in black.

There have been no end of rumours surrounding the iPhone 17 Air – or iPhone 17 Slim as it has also been called – and the latest adds some fuel to an existing fire. Previous reports have suggested the slimmer iPhone 17 model will feature a camera module that spans the width of the device, not too dissimilar from what Google offers on its Pixel 9 series though closer to the top of the phone. 

The most recent leak supports this idea, with Sonny Dickson sharing an image on X of what he claims is a first peek at a third party case for the iPhone 17 Air. Accompanying the image, Dickson said: "Here’s your first look at a case for the iPhone 17 Air. If you didn’t know an Air was coming, you’d swear it was a Google Pixel case."

Read more
I’ve used the iPhone 16 Pro Max for 6 months. Here’s why I love it
The back of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max.

I bought the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max when it was announced and have used it every day since then, racking up six months of use, and yet I’ve written very little about it. It’s time to change that, explain why it is technically my only “permanent” phone, and why I think it’s superb.
How I use my iPhone

I have two SIM cards. One is my “main” SIM card which is attached to the phone number I use, and the other is all about data, and they both live in different phones. My main SIM is switched in and out of review Android phones all the time, while the SIM I use mostly for data only lives in my Apple iPhone. They’re both always with me, and since September 2024 I’ve used the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max alongside whatever Android phone I’m reviewing.

Read more
Apple might serve a massive front camera upgrade on iPhone 17
An iPhone 16 laying on a shelf with its screen on.

The domain of Apple leaks is currently obsessed with the controversial iPhone 17 Pro design refresh, which could stir some heated debate with its massive camera hump. A lot of chatter is also focused on the svelte iPhone 17 Air. Yet, it seems there are a few other internal upgrades worth getting excited about.
According to analyst Jeff Pu, Apple will equip all four iPhone 17 series models with an upgraded 24-megapixel front camera. So far, Apple has stuck with a 12-megapixel selfie snapper on its mainline iPhones. Moreover, the company hasn’t ever deployed a 24-megapixel camera sensor, keeping its experiments limited to 12-megapixel and 48-megapixel units in the past few years.
The research note by Pu, which was seen by MacRumors and 9to5Mac, doesn’t go into details about the specifications or feature details of the new 24-megapixel front snapper on the iPhone 17 series. However, we can take an educated guess, based on what Apple accomplished when it switched from 12-megapixel to 48-megapixel rear cameras.

A 24-megapixel sensor will most likely default to pixel-binning for delivering pictures and videos at a lower resolution than the native pixel count. Pixel-binning essentially combines the light data collected by adjacent pixels, creating what is colloquially known as a super-pixel.
The sum total of these efforts are pictures that are more detailed and with more realistic color rendering, especially in low-light scenarios. Depending on how the pixels are combined, the final image is usually a lower-resolution shot, but more pleasing to look at.
For example, the iPhone 16 Pro’s 48-megapixel main camera does 4-in-1 pixel binning to produce 12-megapixel pictures, but you can still stick full-res 48-megapixel shots, too. There’s also an intermediary option to to get the best of both worlds with 24-megapixel clicks.
With a 24-megapixel selfie camera coming into the picture, iPhone 17 buyers can expect improved selfies and better-quality video calls. Moreover, since there are more pixels to collect light data, Apple might leverage it to offer more advanced camera features, too.

Read more