Facebook policy changes would be a disaster for users, privacy groups warn


A pair of U.S.-based privacy advocacy groups say Facebook’s recently proposed policy changes would be a disaster for users, and may even violate the law. The groups have asked the social network to scrap the suggested provisions to is Data Use and Site Governance Policies altogether.

Facebook hopes to end its practice of allowing users to vote on proposed changes. It also wants to make changes to the messaging settings, and allow for greater sharing of user data between Facebook and “affiliates,” such as Instagram.

In a letter (PDF) to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and the Center for Digital Democracy (CDD) assert that these changes “raise privacy risks for users, may be contrary to law, and violate your previous commitments to users about site governance …”

Privacy risks

The privacy risks inherent in Facebook’s proposed changes are two-fold, the groups say. First, the social network wants to eliminate a setting that allows users to control who can send them messages. At present, the Data Use Policy (Facebook’s name for its privacy policy) reads: “You can control who can start a message thread with you through your ‘How You Connect’ settings. If they include others on that message, the others can reply too.” Facebook wants to delete all of that, and replace it with, “Anyone on a message thread can reply to it.”

The problem with this, say the groups, is that “[b]y removing users’ ability to prevent strangers from sending unwanted messages, the proposed changes are likely to increase the amount of spam that users receive.” This, in turn, “violates users’ privacy and security, as many Facebook scams are accomplished through the messaging feature.”

Second, Facebook wants to be able to share user data with “affiliates,” rather than just advertisers. The most notable affiliate is, of course, Instagram. According to the groups, “Facebook’s decision to combine personal information from Facebook and Instagram raises privacy issues” because consolidating user data would make it easier for hackers to steal that personal information.

Contrary to law

In April, Facebook settled with the Federal Trade Commission over charges that it “repeatedly deceived consumers by telling them they could keep their information on Facebook private, and then repeatedly allowing it to be shared and made public,” according to the FTC. As part of the settlement, the social network must receive “express consent” from users before sharing their personal information “beyond their privacy settings.” Facebook must also provide “clear and prominent notice” before a user’s information is shared.

EPIC and CDD argue that the sharing of information between Facebook and Instagram may be in violation of the company’s settlement with the FTC because doing so may not satisfy either of the terms of the deal listed above.

Vote no more

Back in 2009, after being hit with privacy complaints from groups like EPIC, Facebook voluntarily instituted a voting process for changes to its site governance policies. The rules of the process stated that it would announce proposed changes in a blog post, and if the post receive a minimum of 7,000 comments within 30 days, the changes would go up for a vote. If the proposal received fewer than 7,000 comments, Facebook would automatically institute the changes.

(At present, about 18,600 comments – in English only – have been posted to the most recent proposed policy changes, with an unofficial majority in opposition to the new provisions.)

In the event that a proposal is subjected to user vote, a full 30 percent of users – which currently equals about 300 million people, or the entire population of the United States – would have to vote against the changes to prevent Facebook from adopting them. This year, however, Facebook wants to do away with the whole voting part entirely.

“In the past, your substantive feedback has led to changes to the proposals we made. However, we found that the voting mechanism, which is triggered by a specific number of comments, actually resulted in a system that incentivized the quantity of comments over their quality,” wrote Facebook’s Elliot Schrage in the proposal. “Therefore, we’re proposing to end the voting component of the process in favor of a system that leads to more meaningful feedback and engagement.”

EPIC and CDD say that, while the current system already requires an “unreasonably high participation threshold, scrapping the mechanism altogether raises questions about Facebook’s willingness to take seriously the participation of Facebook users.”

Facebook was not immediately available for comment on the EPIC/CDD letter. We will update this space with any response we receive.


WhatsApp has 400 million users in India, but no fix for its fake news problem

WhatsApp is struggling to stem the tide of fake news in India, its biggest market. In the last few years, its platform has been inundated with an around-the-clock avalanche of misinformation -- misleading mobs into lynching innocents and…

The FTC wants to know exactly why Facebook bought Instagram and WhatsApp

The Federal Trade Commission's antitrust investigation into Facebook will focus in on its acquisition of Instagram and WhatsApp. The FTC wants to know if Facebook tried to acquire its social media rivals before they would become a threat

Facebook is going to add its name to Instagram and WhatsApp

Facebook plans to add its name to both Instagram and WhatsApp as politicians call for the social media giant to be broken apart and the FTC investigates Facebook’s acquisition of both companies.

These are the 10 most disliked videos on YouTube

Ever wondered which videos are the most disliked videos on YouTube? Well, we have the top ten list you’re looking for. Here are the latest videos with the most dislikes currently on YouTube.

Telegram’s new Slow Mode aims to bring order to noisy group chats

Messaging app Telegram has just released some new features that are bound to please. Slow Mode aims to bring some order to group chats, while Silent Messages ensures you won’t wake your buddy if you get in touch late in the day.
Social Media

The EU could hit Facebook with billions in fines over privacy violations

The European Union is reportedly nearing the end of its investigations into some of the cases it has opened against Facebook pertaining to the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation or GDPR. The EU currently has 11 open cases against the…
Social Media

Quit hitting refresh: Twitter is testing a subscribe to tweet replies feature

Soon you might be able to get a push notification when a tweet has been replied to as well. Twitter is currently testing a new feature that will allow users to turn on notifications for a particular thread.

How to make a GIF from a YouTube video

Making a GIF from a YouTube video is easier than ever, but choosing the right tool to use isn't always so simple. In this guide, we'll teach you how to make a GIF from a YouTube video with our three favorite tools.

Facebook admits it was listening to your private conversations, too

Facebook outsourced contractors to listen in on your audio messenger chats and transcribe them. Contractors were not told why they were listening in or why they were transcribing them. Facebook said it is no longer transcribing audio. 
Social Media

How to add music to Instagram videos

Have you ever taken a beautiful video, only to have it ruined by some jerk in the background yelling curse words? Here's a list of apps you can use to add your own music to Instagram posts as well as your Story.

The best dating apps for 2019

Everyone knows online dating can be stressful, time-consuming, and downright awful. Check out our top picks for the best dating apps, so you can streamline the process and find the right date, whatever you're looking for.
Social Media

Twitter’s latest effort to tackle abusive content focuses on Direct Messages

Twitter launched a new feature designed to filter out abusive Direct Messages from people you don't follow. The content is collected in one place and can still be viewed if you want to periodically check what's coming in.

China is running Hong Kong disinformation campaigns through Facebook and Twitter

Facebook and Twitter removed accounts from their platforms that they say were focused on discrediting the protests in Hong Kong. The social networks found accounts, pages, and groups that had coordinated, manipulative content.

Facebook is hiring actual human journalists to fight fake news

Facebook is looking to hire journalists whose job will be to fight fake news. The social media giant said it plans to hire a team of journalists that will curate a dedicated news section known as the News Tab within the mobile app.